Cargando…
Finite helical axis for the analysis of joint kinematics: comparison of an electromagnetic and an optical motion capture system
BACKGROUND: The analysis of joints kinematics is important in clinical practice and in research. Nowadays it is possible to evaluate the mobility of joints in vivo with different motion capture techniques available in the market. Optical systems use infrared cameras and reflective markers to evaluat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-015-0008-7 |
_version_ | 1783291292223012864 |
---|---|
author | Cescon, Corrado Tettamanti, Andrea Barbero, Marco Gatti, Roberto |
author_facet | Cescon, Corrado Tettamanti, Andrea Barbero, Marco Gatti, Roberto |
author_sort | Cescon, Corrado |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The analysis of joints kinematics is important in clinical practice and in research. Nowadays it is possible to evaluate the mobility of joints in vivo with different motion capture techniques available in the market. Optical systems use infrared cameras and reflective markers to evaluate body movements, while other systems use electromagnetic fields to detect position and orientation of sensors. The aim of this study was the evaluation of two motion capture systems based on different technologies (optical and electromagnetic) by comparing the distribution of finite helical axis (FHA) of rotation during controlled rotations of an object in different positions. METHODS: The distribution of position and angle errors of the FHA were extracted by optical and electromagnetic system recordings during a controlled rotation of a low friction stool in different positions in a controlled environment. RESULTS: The optical motion capture system showed lower angle and position errors in the distribution of FHA while the electromagnetic system had higher errors that increased with increasing distance from the antenna. CONCLUSIONS: The optical system showed lower errors in the estimation of FHA that could make it preferable with respect to electromagnetic systems during joint kinematics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5759895 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57598952018-01-16 Finite helical axis for the analysis of joint kinematics: comparison of an electromagnetic and an optical motion capture system Cescon, Corrado Tettamanti, Andrea Barbero, Marco Gatti, Roberto Arch Physiother Research Article BACKGROUND: The analysis of joints kinematics is important in clinical practice and in research. Nowadays it is possible to evaluate the mobility of joints in vivo with different motion capture techniques available in the market. Optical systems use infrared cameras and reflective markers to evaluate body movements, while other systems use electromagnetic fields to detect position and orientation of sensors. The aim of this study was the evaluation of two motion capture systems based on different technologies (optical and electromagnetic) by comparing the distribution of finite helical axis (FHA) of rotation during controlled rotations of an object in different positions. METHODS: The distribution of position and angle errors of the FHA were extracted by optical and electromagnetic system recordings during a controlled rotation of a low friction stool in different positions in a controlled environment. RESULTS: The optical motion capture system showed lower angle and position errors in the distribution of FHA while the electromagnetic system had higher errors that increased with increasing distance from the antenna. CONCLUSIONS: The optical system showed lower errors in the estimation of FHA that could make it preferable with respect to electromagnetic systems during joint kinematics. BioMed Central 2015-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5759895/ /pubmed/29340177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-015-0008-7 Text en © Cescon et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cescon, Corrado Tettamanti, Andrea Barbero, Marco Gatti, Roberto Finite helical axis for the analysis of joint kinematics: comparison of an electromagnetic and an optical motion capture system |
title | Finite helical axis for the analysis of joint kinematics: comparison of an electromagnetic and an optical motion capture system |
title_full | Finite helical axis for the analysis of joint kinematics: comparison of an electromagnetic and an optical motion capture system |
title_fullStr | Finite helical axis for the analysis of joint kinematics: comparison of an electromagnetic and an optical motion capture system |
title_full_unstemmed | Finite helical axis for the analysis of joint kinematics: comparison of an electromagnetic and an optical motion capture system |
title_short | Finite helical axis for the analysis of joint kinematics: comparison of an electromagnetic and an optical motion capture system |
title_sort | finite helical axis for the analysis of joint kinematics: comparison of an electromagnetic and an optical motion capture system |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-015-0008-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cesconcorrado finitehelicalaxisfortheanalysisofjointkinematicscomparisonofanelectromagneticandanopticalmotioncapturesystem AT tettamantiandrea finitehelicalaxisfortheanalysisofjointkinematicscomparisonofanelectromagneticandanopticalmotioncapturesystem AT barberomarco finitehelicalaxisfortheanalysisofjointkinematicscomparisonofanelectromagneticandanopticalmotioncapturesystem AT gattiroberto finitehelicalaxisfortheanalysisofjointkinematicscomparisonofanelectromagneticandanopticalmotioncapturesystem |