Cargando…

Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review

Following the discovery of Mirror Neuron System (MNS), Action Observation Training (AOT) has become an emerging rehabilitation tool to improve motor functions both in neurologic and orthopedic pathologies. The aim of this study is to present the state of the art on the use of AOT in experimental stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarasso, Elisabetta, Gemma, Mariano, Agosta, Federica, Filippi, Massimo, Gatti, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-015-0013-x
_version_ 1783291299043999744
author Sarasso, Elisabetta
Gemma, Mariano
Agosta, Federica
Filippi, Massimo
Gatti, Roberto
author_facet Sarasso, Elisabetta
Gemma, Mariano
Agosta, Federica
Filippi, Massimo
Gatti, Roberto
author_sort Sarasso, Elisabetta
collection PubMed
description Following the discovery of Mirror Neuron System (MNS), Action Observation Training (AOT) has become an emerging rehabilitation tool to improve motor functions both in neurologic and orthopedic pathologies. The aim of this study is to present the state of the art on the use of AOT in experimental studies to improve motor function recovery in any disease. The research was performed in PubMed, PEDro, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (last search July 2015). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyse efficacy of AOT for recovery of motor functions, regardless of the kind of disease, were retrieved. The validity of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for evaluating risk of bias. Twenty RCTs were eligible. Four studies showed AOT efficacy in improving upper limb functional recovery in participants with chronic stroke, two studies in sub-acute ones and one in acute ones. Six articles suggested its effectiveness on walking performance in chronic stroke individuals, and three of them also suggested an efficacy in improving balance. The use of AOT was also recommended in individuals with Parkinson’s disease to improve autonomy in activities of daily living, to improve spontaneous movement rate of self-paced finger movements and to reduce freezing of gait. Other two studies also indicated that AOT improves upper limb motor function in children with cerebral palsy. The last two studies, showed the efficacy of AOT in improving motor recovery in postsurgical orthopedic participants. Overall methodological quality of the considered studies was medium. The majority of analyzed studies suggest the efficacy of AOT, in addition to conventional physiotherapy, to improve motor function recovery in individuals with neurological and orthopedic diseases. However, the application of AOT is very heterogeneous in terms of diseases and outcome measures assessed, which makes it difficult to reach, to date, any conclusion that might influence clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40945-015-0013-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57599252018-01-16 Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review Sarasso, Elisabetta Gemma, Mariano Agosta, Federica Filippi, Massimo Gatti, Roberto Arch Physiother Review Following the discovery of Mirror Neuron System (MNS), Action Observation Training (AOT) has become an emerging rehabilitation tool to improve motor functions both in neurologic and orthopedic pathologies. The aim of this study is to present the state of the art on the use of AOT in experimental studies to improve motor function recovery in any disease. The research was performed in PubMed, PEDro, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (last search July 2015). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyse efficacy of AOT for recovery of motor functions, regardless of the kind of disease, were retrieved. The validity of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for evaluating risk of bias. Twenty RCTs were eligible. Four studies showed AOT efficacy in improving upper limb functional recovery in participants with chronic stroke, two studies in sub-acute ones and one in acute ones. Six articles suggested its effectiveness on walking performance in chronic stroke individuals, and three of them also suggested an efficacy in improving balance. The use of AOT was also recommended in individuals with Parkinson’s disease to improve autonomy in activities of daily living, to improve spontaneous movement rate of self-paced finger movements and to reduce freezing of gait. Other two studies also indicated that AOT improves upper limb motor function in children with cerebral palsy. The last two studies, showed the efficacy of AOT in improving motor recovery in postsurgical orthopedic participants. Overall methodological quality of the considered studies was medium. The majority of analyzed studies suggest the efficacy of AOT, in addition to conventional physiotherapy, to improve motor function recovery in individuals with neurological and orthopedic diseases. However, the application of AOT is very heterogeneous in terms of diseases and outcome measures assessed, which makes it difficult to reach, to date, any conclusion that might influence clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40945-015-0013-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5759925/ /pubmed/29340183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-015-0013-x Text en © Sarasso et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Sarasso, Elisabetta
Gemma, Mariano
Agosta, Federica
Filippi, Massimo
Gatti, Roberto
Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review
title Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review
title_full Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review
title_fullStr Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review
title_short Action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review
title_sort action observation training to improve motor function recovery: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40945-015-0013-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sarassoelisabetta actionobservationtrainingtoimprovemotorfunctionrecoveryasystematicreview
AT gemmamariano actionobservationtrainingtoimprovemotorfunctionrecoveryasystematicreview
AT agostafederica actionobservationtrainingtoimprovemotorfunctionrecoveryasystematicreview
AT filippimassimo actionobservationtrainingtoimprovemotorfunctionrecoveryasystematicreview
AT gattiroberto actionobservationtrainingtoimprovemotorfunctionrecoveryasystematicreview