Cargando…

Describing the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty

BACKGROUND: Learning curves have been described for a number of urological procedures including radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic nephrectomy but rarely for urethroplasty. We describe the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty in a single surgeon series. METHODS: A retrospective case note revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spilotros, Marco, Malde, Sachin, Greenwell, Tamsin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5760369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354500
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.10.01
_version_ 1783291353862504448
author Spilotros, Marco
Malde, Sachin
Greenwell, Tamsin J.
author_facet Spilotros, Marco
Malde, Sachin
Greenwell, Tamsin J.
author_sort Spilotros, Marco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Learning curves have been described for a number of urological procedures including radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic nephrectomy but rarely for urethroplasty. We describe the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty in a single surgeon series. METHODS: A retrospective case note review was performed of 91 consecutive men median age 32 years (range, 15–66 years) having bulbar urethroplasty performed by a single surgeon. Data was collected on type of urethroplasty, restricture rate (as defined by urethrogram and/or flow rate) and duration of follow up. The restricture rates were compared by quartiles and statistical analysis was by ¦Ö(2) between the first and fourth quartiles. RESULTS: The 91 men had 42 dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft (Dorsal BMG), 20 BMG augmented bulbobulbar anastomotic (Augmented Rooftop) and 29 bulbobulbar anastomotic (BBA) urethroplasties performed. Median follow up was 39 months for the first quartile, 42 months for the second, 36 months for the third, and 35 months for the fourth. The restricture rate was 17% in the first quartile, 8.7% in the second and third quartiles and 4.5% in the fourth quartile. There were no restrictures noted after 24 months. There were 4 restrictures in the first quartile and 1 restricture in the fourth quartile (¦Ö(2) P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically and clinically significant difference in restricture rates between first and fourth quartiles with rates falling from 17% to 4.5%. There is a learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty with a reduced restricture rate each quartile and it may take as many as 90 cases to reach optimum restricture rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5760369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57603692018-01-19 Describing the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty Spilotros, Marco Malde, Sachin Greenwell, Tamsin J. Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: Learning curves have been described for a number of urological procedures including radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic nephrectomy but rarely for urethroplasty. We describe the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty in a single surgeon series. METHODS: A retrospective case note review was performed of 91 consecutive men median age 32 years (range, 15–66 years) having bulbar urethroplasty performed by a single surgeon. Data was collected on type of urethroplasty, restricture rate (as defined by urethrogram and/or flow rate) and duration of follow up. The restricture rates were compared by quartiles and statistical analysis was by ¦Ö(2) between the first and fourth quartiles. RESULTS: The 91 men had 42 dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft (Dorsal BMG), 20 BMG augmented bulbobulbar anastomotic (Augmented Rooftop) and 29 bulbobulbar anastomotic (BBA) urethroplasties performed. Median follow up was 39 months for the first quartile, 42 months for the second, 36 months for the third, and 35 months for the fourth. The restricture rate was 17% in the first quartile, 8.7% in the second and third quartiles and 4.5% in the fourth quartile. There were no restrictures noted after 24 months. There were 4 restrictures in the first quartile and 1 restricture in the fourth quartile (¦Ö(2) P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically and clinically significant difference in restricture rates between first and fourth quartiles with rates falling from 17% to 4.5%. There is a learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty with a reduced restricture rate each quartile and it may take as many as 90 cases to reach optimum restricture rates. AME Publishing Company 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5760369/ /pubmed/29354500 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.10.01 Text en 2017 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Article
Spilotros, Marco
Malde, Sachin
Greenwell, Tamsin J.
Describing the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty
title Describing the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty
title_full Describing the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty
title_fullStr Describing the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Describing the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty
title_short Describing the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty
title_sort describing the learning curve for bulbar urethroplasty
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5760369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354500
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.10.01
work_keys_str_mv AT spilotrosmarco describingthelearningcurveforbulbarurethroplasty
AT maldesachin describingthelearningcurveforbulbarurethroplasty
AT greenwelltamsinj describingthelearningcurveforbulbarurethroplasty