Cargando…

Predicting success after artificial urinary sphincter: which preoperative factors drive patient satisfaction postoperatively?

BACKGROUND: To determine which preoperative factors drive patient-reported quality of life (QoL) after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation. METHODS: Men receiving AUS after prostate cancer treatment were identified from a prospectively collected dataset. Preoperative factors were recorde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chertack, Nathan, Gill, Bradley C., Angermeier, Kenneth W., Montague, Drogo K., Wood, Hadley M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5760395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354501
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.10.05
_version_ 1783291360476921856
author Chertack, Nathan
Gill, Bradley C.
Angermeier, Kenneth W.
Montague, Drogo K.
Wood, Hadley M.
author_facet Chertack, Nathan
Gill, Bradley C.
Angermeier, Kenneth W.
Montague, Drogo K.
Wood, Hadley M.
author_sort Chertack, Nathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine which preoperative factors drive patient-reported quality of life (QoL) after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation. METHODS: Men receiving AUS after prostate cancer treatment were identified from a prospectively collected dataset. Preoperative factors were recorded during the initial incontinence consultation. Patients underwent urodynamic testing (UDS) preoperatively at surgeon discretion. Patients were surveyed by telephone postoperatively and given the EPIC Urinary Domain (EPIC-UD) and Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) questionnaires. Differences in postoperative maximum pads per day (MxPPD) and questionnaire scores were compared across preoperative factors, with P¡Ü0.05 indicating statistical significance. RESULTS: Telephone survey was completed by 101 of 238 patients (42%). Median age was 69 [63–75] years, BMI was 29 [26–32] kg/m(2). MxPPD was 5 [3–9] preoperatively and 2 [1–3] postoperatively (r=0.255, P=0.011). Postoperative median EPIC-UD was 82 [67–89] and UDI-6 was 22 [11–36]. Postoperative MxPPD was lower in patients who reported being able to store urine before AUS {2 [1–2] vs. 2 [1–4], P=0.046}, and lower with urodynamically-proven detrusor overactivity (DO) {1.5 [1–2] with vs. 2 [1–4] without, P=0.050}. Detrusor pressure at maximum flow was negatively associated with QoL as measured by EPIC-UD score (r=−0.346, P=0.013) and UDI-6 score (r=0.413, P=0.003). Although 41 (41%) patients had a history of radiation, postoperative outcomes did not significantly differ with or without a history of radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Few preoperative factors predict QoL after AUS insertion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5760395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57603952018-01-19 Predicting success after artificial urinary sphincter: which preoperative factors drive patient satisfaction postoperatively? Chertack, Nathan Gill, Bradley C. Angermeier, Kenneth W. Montague, Drogo K. Wood, Hadley M. Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: To determine which preoperative factors drive patient-reported quality of life (QoL) after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation. METHODS: Men receiving AUS after prostate cancer treatment were identified from a prospectively collected dataset. Preoperative factors were recorded during the initial incontinence consultation. Patients underwent urodynamic testing (UDS) preoperatively at surgeon discretion. Patients were surveyed by telephone postoperatively and given the EPIC Urinary Domain (EPIC-UD) and Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) questionnaires. Differences in postoperative maximum pads per day (MxPPD) and questionnaire scores were compared across preoperative factors, with P¡Ü0.05 indicating statistical significance. RESULTS: Telephone survey was completed by 101 of 238 patients (42%). Median age was 69 [63–75] years, BMI was 29 [26–32] kg/m(2). MxPPD was 5 [3–9] preoperatively and 2 [1–3] postoperatively (r=0.255, P=0.011). Postoperative median EPIC-UD was 82 [67–89] and UDI-6 was 22 [11–36]. Postoperative MxPPD was lower in patients who reported being able to store urine before AUS {2 [1–2] vs. 2 [1–4], P=0.046}, and lower with urodynamically-proven detrusor overactivity (DO) {1.5 [1–2] with vs. 2 [1–4] without, P=0.050}. Detrusor pressure at maximum flow was negatively associated with QoL as measured by EPIC-UD score (r=−0.346, P=0.013) and UDI-6 score (r=0.413, P=0.003). Although 41 (41%) patients had a history of radiation, postoperative outcomes did not significantly differ with or without a history of radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Few preoperative factors predict QoL after AUS insertion. AME Publishing Company 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5760395/ /pubmed/29354501 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.10.05 Text en 2017 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chertack, Nathan
Gill, Bradley C.
Angermeier, Kenneth W.
Montague, Drogo K.
Wood, Hadley M.
Predicting success after artificial urinary sphincter: which preoperative factors drive patient satisfaction postoperatively?
title Predicting success after artificial urinary sphincter: which preoperative factors drive patient satisfaction postoperatively?
title_full Predicting success after artificial urinary sphincter: which preoperative factors drive patient satisfaction postoperatively?
title_fullStr Predicting success after artificial urinary sphincter: which preoperative factors drive patient satisfaction postoperatively?
title_full_unstemmed Predicting success after artificial urinary sphincter: which preoperative factors drive patient satisfaction postoperatively?
title_short Predicting success after artificial urinary sphincter: which preoperative factors drive patient satisfaction postoperatively?
title_sort predicting success after artificial urinary sphincter: which preoperative factors drive patient satisfaction postoperatively?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5760395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354501
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.10.05
work_keys_str_mv AT chertacknathan predictingsuccessafterartificialurinarysphincterwhichpreoperativefactorsdrivepatientsatisfactionpostoperatively
AT gillbradleyc predictingsuccessafterartificialurinarysphincterwhichpreoperativefactorsdrivepatientsatisfactionpostoperatively
AT angermeierkennethw predictingsuccessafterartificialurinarysphincterwhichpreoperativefactorsdrivepatientsatisfactionpostoperatively
AT montaguedrogok predictingsuccessafterartificialurinarysphincterwhichpreoperativefactorsdrivepatientsatisfactionpostoperatively
AT woodhadleym predictingsuccessafterartificialurinarysphincterwhichpreoperativefactorsdrivepatientsatisfactionpostoperatively