Cargando…

Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation?

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the differential effect of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status (exon 19 vs. 21) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in treatment-naïve advanced EGFR mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joshi, Amit, Patil, Vijay, Noronha, Vanita, Chougule, Anuradha, Bhattacharjee, Atanu, Kumar, Rajiv, Goud, Supriya, More, Sucheta, Ramaswamy, Anant, Karpe, Ashay, Pande, Nikhil, Chandrasekharan, Arun, Goel, Alok, Talreja, Vikas, Mahajan, Abhishek, Janu, Amit, Purandare, Nilendu, Prabhash, Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5760863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29319030
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_201_17
_version_ 1783291451913797632
author Joshi, Amit
Patil, Vijay
Noronha, Vanita
Chougule, Anuradha
Bhattacharjee, Atanu
Kumar, Rajiv
Goud, Supriya
More, Sucheta
Ramaswamy, Anant
Karpe, Ashay
Pande, Nikhil
Chandrasekharan, Arun
Goel, Alok
Talreja, Vikas
Mahajan, Abhishek
Janu, Amit
Purandare, Nilendu
Prabhash, Kumar
author_facet Joshi, Amit
Patil, Vijay
Noronha, Vanita
Chougule, Anuradha
Bhattacharjee, Atanu
Kumar, Rajiv
Goud, Supriya
More, Sucheta
Ramaswamy, Anant
Karpe, Ashay
Pande, Nikhil
Chandrasekharan, Arun
Goel, Alok
Talreja, Vikas
Mahajan, Abhishek
Janu, Amit
Purandare, Nilendu
Prabhash, Kumar
author_sort Joshi, Amit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the differential effect of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status (exon 19 vs. 21) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in treatment-naïve advanced EGFR mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gefitinib as first-line agent. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of EGFR-mutated (exon 19 and 21) advanced-stage (Stage IIIB or IV), chemotherapy-naive NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib as first line in a phase 3 randomized study. Patients were treated with gefitinib 250 mg daily. Patients underwent axial imaging for response assessment on D42, D84, D126, and subsequently every 2 months till progression. Responding or stable patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival estimation and log-rank test for comparison. Cox proportion hazard model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one patients were eligible for analysis, of which 78 were males and 63 were females. A total of 127 patients (90.1%) were ECOG 0–1 while 14 patients (9.1%) were ECOG >1. Exon 21 mutation was present in 65 patients (46.1%) and exon 19 mutation in 76 patients (53.9%). One hundred and thirty-three of 141 patients were evaluable for response. Response rate of patients having exon 19 mutation was 72.9% (51 patients, n = 70) while it was 55.6% in patients having exon 21 mutation (35 patients, n = 63) (P = 0.046). Median PFS in exon 19-mutated patients was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.832–11.768) compared to 7.8 months (95% CI 5.543–10.0) (P = 0.699) in exon 21-mutated patients. The median OS in exon 19-mutated patients was 19.8 months (95% CI 16.8–22.7), and it was 16.5 months (95% CI 10.9–22.1) in exon 21-mutated patients (P = 0.215). CONCLUSION: There were no differential outcomes in the Indian patients of advanced-stage NSCLC with exon 19 and 21 EGFR mutations treated with gefitinib.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5760863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57608632018-02-07 Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation? Joshi, Amit Patil, Vijay Noronha, Vanita Chougule, Anuradha Bhattacharjee, Atanu Kumar, Rajiv Goud, Supriya More, Sucheta Ramaswamy, Anant Karpe, Ashay Pande, Nikhil Chandrasekharan, Arun Goel, Alok Talreja, Vikas Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Purandare, Nilendu Prabhash, Kumar Lung India Original Article BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the differential effect of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status (exon 19 vs. 21) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in treatment-naïve advanced EGFR mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gefitinib as first-line agent. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of EGFR-mutated (exon 19 and 21) advanced-stage (Stage IIIB or IV), chemotherapy-naive NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib as first line in a phase 3 randomized study. Patients were treated with gefitinib 250 mg daily. Patients underwent axial imaging for response assessment on D42, D84, D126, and subsequently every 2 months till progression. Responding or stable patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival estimation and log-rank test for comparison. Cox proportion hazard model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one patients were eligible for analysis, of which 78 were males and 63 were females. A total of 127 patients (90.1%) were ECOG 0–1 while 14 patients (9.1%) were ECOG >1. Exon 21 mutation was present in 65 patients (46.1%) and exon 19 mutation in 76 patients (53.9%). One hundred and thirty-three of 141 patients were evaluable for response. Response rate of patients having exon 19 mutation was 72.9% (51 patients, n = 70) while it was 55.6% in patients having exon 21 mutation (35 patients, n = 63) (P = 0.046). Median PFS in exon 19-mutated patients was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.832–11.768) compared to 7.8 months (95% CI 5.543–10.0) (P = 0.699) in exon 21-mutated patients. The median OS in exon 19-mutated patients was 19.8 months (95% CI 16.8–22.7), and it was 16.5 months (95% CI 10.9–22.1) in exon 21-mutated patients (P = 0.215). CONCLUSION: There were no differential outcomes in the Indian patients of advanced-stage NSCLC with exon 19 and 21 EGFR mutations treated with gefitinib. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5760863/ /pubmed/29319030 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_201_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Chest Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Joshi, Amit
Patil, Vijay
Noronha, Vanita
Chougule, Anuradha
Bhattacharjee, Atanu
Kumar, Rajiv
Goud, Supriya
More, Sucheta
Ramaswamy, Anant
Karpe, Ashay
Pande, Nikhil
Chandrasekharan, Arun
Goel, Alok
Talreja, Vikas
Mahajan, Abhishek
Janu, Amit
Purandare, Nilendu
Prabhash, Kumar
Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation?
title Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation?
title_full Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation?
title_fullStr Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation?
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation?
title_short Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation?
title_sort efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5760863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29319030
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_201_17
work_keys_str_mv AT joshiamit efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT patilvijay efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT noronhavanita efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT chouguleanuradha efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT bhattacharjeeatanu efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT kumarrajiv efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT goudsupriya efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT moresucheta efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT ramaswamyanant efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT karpeashay efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT pandenikhil efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT chandrasekharanarun efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT goelalok efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT talrejavikas efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT mahajanabhishek efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT januamit efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT purandarenilendu efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation
AT prabhashkumar efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation