Cargando…
Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation?
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the differential effect of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status (exon 19 vs. 21) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in treatment-naïve advanced EGFR mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5760863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29319030 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_201_17 |
_version_ | 1783291451913797632 |
---|---|
author | Joshi, Amit Patil, Vijay Noronha, Vanita Chougule, Anuradha Bhattacharjee, Atanu Kumar, Rajiv Goud, Supriya More, Sucheta Ramaswamy, Anant Karpe, Ashay Pande, Nikhil Chandrasekharan, Arun Goel, Alok Talreja, Vikas Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Purandare, Nilendu Prabhash, Kumar |
author_facet | Joshi, Amit Patil, Vijay Noronha, Vanita Chougule, Anuradha Bhattacharjee, Atanu Kumar, Rajiv Goud, Supriya More, Sucheta Ramaswamy, Anant Karpe, Ashay Pande, Nikhil Chandrasekharan, Arun Goel, Alok Talreja, Vikas Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Purandare, Nilendu Prabhash, Kumar |
author_sort | Joshi, Amit |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the differential effect of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status (exon 19 vs. 21) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in treatment-naïve advanced EGFR mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gefitinib as first-line agent. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of EGFR-mutated (exon 19 and 21) advanced-stage (Stage IIIB or IV), chemotherapy-naive NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib as first line in a phase 3 randomized study. Patients were treated with gefitinib 250 mg daily. Patients underwent axial imaging for response assessment on D42, D84, D126, and subsequently every 2 months till progression. Responding or stable patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival estimation and log-rank test for comparison. Cox proportion hazard model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one patients were eligible for analysis, of which 78 were males and 63 were females. A total of 127 patients (90.1%) were ECOG 0–1 while 14 patients (9.1%) were ECOG >1. Exon 21 mutation was present in 65 patients (46.1%) and exon 19 mutation in 76 patients (53.9%). One hundred and thirty-three of 141 patients were evaluable for response. Response rate of patients having exon 19 mutation was 72.9% (51 patients, n = 70) while it was 55.6% in patients having exon 21 mutation (35 patients, n = 63) (P = 0.046). Median PFS in exon 19-mutated patients was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.832–11.768) compared to 7.8 months (95% CI 5.543–10.0) (P = 0.699) in exon 21-mutated patients. The median OS in exon 19-mutated patients was 19.8 months (95% CI 16.8–22.7), and it was 16.5 months (95% CI 10.9–22.1) in exon 21-mutated patients (P = 0.215). CONCLUSION: There were no differential outcomes in the Indian patients of advanced-stage NSCLC with exon 19 and 21 EGFR mutations treated with gefitinib. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5760863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57608632018-02-07 Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation? Joshi, Amit Patil, Vijay Noronha, Vanita Chougule, Anuradha Bhattacharjee, Atanu Kumar, Rajiv Goud, Supriya More, Sucheta Ramaswamy, Anant Karpe, Ashay Pande, Nikhil Chandrasekharan, Arun Goel, Alok Talreja, Vikas Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Purandare, Nilendu Prabhash, Kumar Lung India Original Article BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the differential effect of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status (exon 19 vs. 21) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in treatment-naïve advanced EGFR mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gefitinib as first-line agent. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of EGFR-mutated (exon 19 and 21) advanced-stage (Stage IIIB or IV), chemotherapy-naive NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib as first line in a phase 3 randomized study. Patients were treated with gefitinib 250 mg daily. Patients underwent axial imaging for response assessment on D42, D84, D126, and subsequently every 2 months till progression. Responding or stable patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival estimation and log-rank test for comparison. Cox proportion hazard model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one patients were eligible for analysis, of which 78 were males and 63 were females. A total of 127 patients (90.1%) were ECOG 0–1 while 14 patients (9.1%) were ECOG >1. Exon 21 mutation was present in 65 patients (46.1%) and exon 19 mutation in 76 patients (53.9%). One hundred and thirty-three of 141 patients were evaluable for response. Response rate of patients having exon 19 mutation was 72.9% (51 patients, n = 70) while it was 55.6% in patients having exon 21 mutation (35 patients, n = 63) (P = 0.046). Median PFS in exon 19-mutated patients was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.832–11.768) compared to 7.8 months (95% CI 5.543–10.0) (P = 0.699) in exon 21-mutated patients. The median OS in exon 19-mutated patients was 19.8 months (95% CI 16.8–22.7), and it was 16.5 months (95% CI 10.9–22.1) in exon 21-mutated patients (P = 0.215). CONCLUSION: There were no differential outcomes in the Indian patients of advanced-stage NSCLC with exon 19 and 21 EGFR mutations treated with gefitinib. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5760863/ /pubmed/29319030 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_201_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Chest Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Joshi, Amit Patil, Vijay Noronha, Vanita Chougule, Anuradha Bhattacharjee, Atanu Kumar, Rajiv Goud, Supriya More, Sucheta Ramaswamy, Anant Karpe, Ashay Pande, Nikhil Chandrasekharan, Arun Goel, Alok Talreja, Vikas Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Purandare, Nilendu Prabhash, Kumar Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation? |
title | Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation? |
title_full | Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation? |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation? |
title_short | Efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation? |
title_sort | efficacy of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: does exon 19 deletion differ from exon 21 mutation? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5760863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29319030 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_201_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joshiamit efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT patilvijay efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT noronhavanita efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT chouguleanuradha efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT bhattacharjeeatanu efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT kumarrajiv efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT goudsupriya efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT moresucheta efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT ramaswamyanant efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT karpeashay efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT pandenikhil efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT chandrasekharanarun efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT goelalok efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT talrejavikas efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT mahajanabhishek efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT januamit efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT purandarenilendu efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation AT prabhashkumar efficacyofgefitinibinepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoractivatingmutationpositivenonsmallcelllungcancerdoesexon19deletiondifferfromexon21mutation |