Cargando…

CUILESS2016: a clinical corpus applying compositional normalization of text mentions

BACKGROUND: Traditionally text mention normalization corpora have normalized concepts to single ontology identifiers (“pre-coordinated concepts”). Less frequently, normalization corpora have used concepts with multiple identifiers (“post-coordinated concepts”) but the additional identifiers have bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osborne, John D., Neu, Matthew B., Danila, Maria I., Solorio, Thamar, Bethard, Steven J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5761157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-017-0173-6
_version_ 1783291512982863872
author Osborne, John D.
Neu, Matthew B.
Danila, Maria I.
Solorio, Thamar
Bethard, Steven J.
author_facet Osborne, John D.
Neu, Matthew B.
Danila, Maria I.
Solorio, Thamar
Bethard, Steven J.
author_sort Osborne, John D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditionally text mention normalization corpora have normalized concepts to single ontology identifiers (“pre-coordinated concepts”). Less frequently, normalization corpora have used concepts with multiple identifiers (“post-coordinated concepts”) but the additional identifiers have been restricted to a defined set of relationships to the core concept. This approach limits the ability of the normalization process to express semantic meaning. We generated a freely available corpus using post-coordinated concepts without a defined set of relationships that we term “compositional concepts” to evaluate their use in clinical text. METHODS: We annotated 5397 disorder mentions from the ShARe corpus to SNOMED CT that were previously normalized as “CUI-less” in the “SemEval-2015 Task 14” shared task because they lacked a pre-coordinated mapping. Unlike the previous normalization method, we do not restrict concept mappings to a particular set of the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) semantic types and allow normalization to occur to multiple UMLS Concept Unique Identifiers (CUIs). We computed annotator agreement and assessed semantic coverage with this method. RESULTS: We generated the largest clinical text normalization corpus to date with mappings to multiple identifiers and made it freely available. All but 8 of the 5397 disorder mentions were normalized using this methodology. Annotator agreement ranged from 52.4% using the strictest metric (exact matching) to 78.2% using a hierarchical agreement that measures the overlap of shared ancestral nodes. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence that compositional concepts can increase semantic coverage in clinical text. To our knowledge we provide the first freely available corpus of compositional concept annotation in clinical text. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13326-017-0173-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5761157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57611572018-01-16 CUILESS2016: a clinical corpus applying compositional normalization of text mentions Osborne, John D. Neu, Matthew B. Danila, Maria I. Solorio, Thamar Bethard, Steven J. J Biomed Semantics Research BACKGROUND: Traditionally text mention normalization corpora have normalized concepts to single ontology identifiers (“pre-coordinated concepts”). Less frequently, normalization corpora have used concepts with multiple identifiers (“post-coordinated concepts”) but the additional identifiers have been restricted to a defined set of relationships to the core concept. This approach limits the ability of the normalization process to express semantic meaning. We generated a freely available corpus using post-coordinated concepts without a defined set of relationships that we term “compositional concepts” to evaluate their use in clinical text. METHODS: We annotated 5397 disorder mentions from the ShARe corpus to SNOMED CT that were previously normalized as “CUI-less” in the “SemEval-2015 Task 14” shared task because they lacked a pre-coordinated mapping. Unlike the previous normalization method, we do not restrict concept mappings to a particular set of the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) semantic types and allow normalization to occur to multiple UMLS Concept Unique Identifiers (CUIs). We computed annotator agreement and assessed semantic coverage with this method. RESULTS: We generated the largest clinical text normalization corpus to date with mappings to multiple identifiers and made it freely available. All but 8 of the 5397 disorder mentions were normalized using this methodology. Annotator agreement ranged from 52.4% using the strictest metric (exact matching) to 78.2% using a hierarchical agreement that measures the overlap of shared ancestral nodes. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence that compositional concepts can increase semantic coverage in clinical text. To our knowledge we provide the first freely available corpus of compositional concept annotation in clinical text. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13326-017-0173-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5761157/ /pubmed/29316970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-017-0173-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Osborne, John D.
Neu, Matthew B.
Danila, Maria I.
Solorio, Thamar
Bethard, Steven J.
CUILESS2016: a clinical corpus applying compositional normalization of text mentions
title CUILESS2016: a clinical corpus applying compositional normalization of text mentions
title_full CUILESS2016: a clinical corpus applying compositional normalization of text mentions
title_fullStr CUILESS2016: a clinical corpus applying compositional normalization of text mentions
title_full_unstemmed CUILESS2016: a clinical corpus applying compositional normalization of text mentions
title_short CUILESS2016: a clinical corpus applying compositional normalization of text mentions
title_sort cuiless2016: a clinical corpus applying compositional normalization of text mentions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5761157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13326-017-0173-6
work_keys_str_mv AT osbornejohnd cuiless2016aclinicalcorpusapplyingcompositionalnormalizationoftextmentions
AT neumatthewb cuiless2016aclinicalcorpusapplyingcompositionalnormalizationoftextmentions
AT danilamariai cuiless2016aclinicalcorpusapplyingcompositionalnormalizationoftextmentions
AT soloriothamar cuiless2016aclinicalcorpusapplyingcompositionalnormalizationoftextmentions
AT bethardstevenj cuiless2016aclinicalcorpusapplyingcompositionalnormalizationoftextmentions