Cargando…
What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews have been considered as the pillar on which evidence-based healthcare rests. Systematic review methodology has evolved and been modified over the years to accommodate the range of questions that may arise in the health and medical sciences. This paper explores a concep...
Autores principales: | Munn, Zachary, Stern, Cindy, Aromataris, Edoardo, Lockwood, Craig, Jordan, Zoe |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5761190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
por: Munn, Zachary, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence
por: Barker, Timothy Hugh, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach
por: Munn, Zachary, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Supporting a definition of predatory publishing
por: Aromataris, Edoardo, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Reducing HIV-related stigma and discrimination in healthcare settings: a systematic review of guidelines, tools, standards of practice, best practices, consensus statements and systematic reviews
por: Feyissa, Garumma Tolu, et al.
Publicado: (2018)