Cargando…

A harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in Peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: A cohort study

BACKGROUND: In Peru, abortion is legal only to preserve the life and health of the woman. A non-profit clinic system in Peru implemented a harm-reduction model for women with unwanted pregnancy that included pre-abortion care with instructions about misoprostol use and post-abortion care; they start...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grossman, Daniel, Baum, Sarah E., Andjelic, Denitza, Tatum, Carrie, Torres, Guadalupe, Fuentes, Liza, Friedman, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5761856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29320513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189195
_version_ 1783291602040520704
author Grossman, Daniel
Baum, Sarah E.
Andjelic, Denitza
Tatum, Carrie
Torres, Guadalupe
Fuentes, Liza
Friedman, Jennifer
author_facet Grossman, Daniel
Baum, Sarah E.
Andjelic, Denitza
Tatum, Carrie
Torres, Guadalupe
Fuentes, Liza
Friedman, Jennifer
author_sort Grossman, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Peru, abortion is legal only to preserve the life and health of the woman. A non-profit clinic system in Peru implemented a harm-reduction model for women with unwanted pregnancy that included pre-abortion care with instructions about misoprostol use and post-abortion care; they started offering telephone follow-up for clients in 2011. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the harm-reduction model, and to compare outcomes by type of follow-up obtained. METHODS: Between January 2012 and March 2013, 500 adult women seeking harm-reduction services were recruited into the study. Telephone surveys were conducted approximately four weeks after their initial harm-reduction counseling session with 262 women (response rate 52%); 9 participants were excluded. The survey focused on whether women pursued an abortion, and if so, what their experience was. Demographic and clinical data were also extracted from clinic records. RESULTS: Eighty-six percent of participants took misoprostol; among those taking misoprostol, 89% reported a complete abortion at the time of the survey. Twenty-two percent obtained an aspiration after taking misoprostol and 8% self-reported adverse events including hemorrhage without transfusion, infection, or severe pain. Among women who took misoprostol, 46% reported receiving in-person follow-up (in some cases both telephone and in-person), 34% received telephone only, and 20% did not report receiving any form of follow-up. Those who had in-person follow-up with the counselor were most likely to report a complete abortion (<0.001). Satisfaction with both types of follow-up was very high, with 81%-89% reporting being very satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Liberalization of restrictive abortion laws is associated with improvements in health outcomes, but the process of legal reform is often lengthy. In the interim, giving women information about evidence-based regimens of misoprostol, as well as offering a range of follow-up options to ensure high quality post-abortion care, may reduce the risks associated with unsafe abortion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5761856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57618562018-01-23 A harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in Peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: A cohort study Grossman, Daniel Baum, Sarah E. Andjelic, Denitza Tatum, Carrie Torres, Guadalupe Fuentes, Liza Friedman, Jennifer PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In Peru, abortion is legal only to preserve the life and health of the woman. A non-profit clinic system in Peru implemented a harm-reduction model for women with unwanted pregnancy that included pre-abortion care with instructions about misoprostol use and post-abortion care; they started offering telephone follow-up for clients in 2011. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the harm-reduction model, and to compare outcomes by type of follow-up obtained. METHODS: Between January 2012 and March 2013, 500 adult women seeking harm-reduction services were recruited into the study. Telephone surveys were conducted approximately four weeks after their initial harm-reduction counseling session with 262 women (response rate 52%); 9 participants were excluded. The survey focused on whether women pursued an abortion, and if so, what their experience was. Demographic and clinical data were also extracted from clinic records. RESULTS: Eighty-six percent of participants took misoprostol; among those taking misoprostol, 89% reported a complete abortion at the time of the survey. Twenty-two percent obtained an aspiration after taking misoprostol and 8% self-reported adverse events including hemorrhage without transfusion, infection, or severe pain. Among women who took misoprostol, 46% reported receiving in-person follow-up (in some cases both telephone and in-person), 34% received telephone only, and 20% did not report receiving any form of follow-up. Those who had in-person follow-up with the counselor were most likely to report a complete abortion (<0.001). Satisfaction with both types of follow-up was very high, with 81%-89% reporting being very satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Liberalization of restrictive abortion laws is associated with improvements in health outcomes, but the process of legal reform is often lengthy. In the interim, giving women information about evidence-based regimens of misoprostol, as well as offering a range of follow-up options to ensure high quality post-abortion care, may reduce the risks associated with unsafe abortion. Public Library of Science 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5761856/ /pubmed/29320513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189195 Text en © 2018 Grossman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grossman, Daniel
Baum, Sarah E.
Andjelic, Denitza
Tatum, Carrie
Torres, Guadalupe
Fuentes, Liza
Friedman, Jennifer
A harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in Peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: A cohort study
title A harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in Peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: A cohort study
title_full A harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in Peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: A cohort study
title_fullStr A harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in Peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: A cohort study
title_full_unstemmed A harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in Peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: A cohort study
title_short A harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in Peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: A cohort study
title_sort harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: a cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5761856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29320513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189195
work_keys_str_mv AT grossmandaniel aharmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT baumsarahe aharmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT andjelicdenitza aharmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT tatumcarrie aharmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT torresguadalupe aharmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT fuentesliza aharmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT friedmanjennifer aharmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT grossmandaniel harmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT baumsarahe harmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT andjelicdenitza harmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT tatumcarrie harmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT torresguadalupe harmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT fuentesliza harmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy
AT friedmanjennifer harmreductionmodelofabortioncounselingaboutmisoprostoluseinperuwithtelephoneandinpersonfollowupacohortstudy