Cargando…

Dosimetric Analysis of Microscopic Disease in SBRT for Lung Cancers

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to theoretically and experimentally evaluate the dosimetry in the microscopic disease regions surrounding the tumor under stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung cancer. METHODS: For simplicity, the tumor was considered moving along 1 dimension with a pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mao, Ronghu, Tian, Lingling, Zhang, You, Ren, Lei, Gao, Renqi, Yin, Fang-Fang, Ge, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29332497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617734689
_version_ 1783291630565982208
author Mao, Ronghu
Tian, Lingling
Zhang, You
Ren, Lei
Gao, Renqi
Yin, Fang-Fang
Ge, Hong
author_facet Mao, Ronghu
Tian, Lingling
Zhang, You
Ren, Lei
Gao, Renqi
Yin, Fang-Fang
Ge, Hong
author_sort Mao, Ronghu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to theoretically and experimentally evaluate the dosimetry in the microscopic disease regions surrounding the tumor under stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung cancer. METHODS: For simplicity, the tumor was considered moving along 1 dimension with a periodic function. The probability distribution function of the tumor position was generated according to the motion pattern and was used to estimate the delivered dose in the microscopic disease region. An experimental measurement was conducted to validate both the estimated dose with a probability function and the calculated dose from 4-dimensional computed tomography data using a dynamic thorax phantom. Four tumor motion patterns were simulated with cos(4)(x) and sin(x), each with 2 different amplitudes: 10 mm and 5 mm. A 7-field conformal plan was created for treatment delivery. Both films (EBT2) and optically stimulated luminescence detectors were inserted in and around the target of the phantom to measure the delivered doses. Dose differences were evaluated using gamma analysis with 3%/3 mm. RESULTS: The average gamma index between measured doses using film and calculated doses using average intensity projection simulation computed tomography was 80.8% ± 0.9%. In contrast, between measured doses using film and calculated doses accumulated from 10 sets of 4-dimensional computed tomography data, it was 98.7% ± 0.6%. The measured doses using optically stimulated luminescence detectors matched very well (within 5% of the measurement uncertainty) with the theoretically calculated doses using probability distribution function at the corresponding position. Respiratory movement caused inadvertent irradiation exposure, with 70% to 80% of the dose line wrapped around the 10 mm region outside the target. CONCLUSION: The use of static dose calculation in the treatment planning system could substantially underestimate the actual delivered dose in the microscopic disease region for a moving target. The margin for microscopic disease may be substantially reduced or even eliminated for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5762078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57620782018-01-17 Dosimetric Analysis of Microscopic Disease in SBRT for Lung Cancers Mao, Ronghu Tian, Lingling Zhang, You Ren, Lei Gao, Renqi Yin, Fang-Fang Ge, Hong Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to theoretically and experimentally evaluate the dosimetry in the microscopic disease regions surrounding the tumor under stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung cancer. METHODS: For simplicity, the tumor was considered moving along 1 dimension with a periodic function. The probability distribution function of the tumor position was generated according to the motion pattern and was used to estimate the delivered dose in the microscopic disease region. An experimental measurement was conducted to validate both the estimated dose with a probability function and the calculated dose from 4-dimensional computed tomography data using a dynamic thorax phantom. Four tumor motion patterns were simulated with cos(4)(x) and sin(x), each with 2 different amplitudes: 10 mm and 5 mm. A 7-field conformal plan was created for treatment delivery. Both films (EBT2) and optically stimulated luminescence detectors were inserted in and around the target of the phantom to measure the delivered doses. Dose differences were evaluated using gamma analysis with 3%/3 mm. RESULTS: The average gamma index between measured doses using film and calculated doses using average intensity projection simulation computed tomography was 80.8% ± 0.9%. In contrast, between measured doses using film and calculated doses accumulated from 10 sets of 4-dimensional computed tomography data, it was 98.7% ± 0.6%. The measured doses using optically stimulated luminescence detectors matched very well (within 5% of the measurement uncertainty) with the theoretically calculated doses using probability distribution function at the corresponding position. Respiratory movement caused inadvertent irradiation exposure, with 70% to 80% of the dose line wrapped around the 10 mm region outside the target. CONCLUSION: The use of static dose calculation in the treatment planning system could substantially underestimate the actual delivered dose in the microscopic disease region for a moving target. The margin for microscopic disease may be substantially reduced or even eliminated for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. SAGE Publications 2017-10-11 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5762078/ /pubmed/29332497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617734689 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Mao, Ronghu
Tian, Lingling
Zhang, You
Ren, Lei
Gao, Renqi
Yin, Fang-Fang
Ge, Hong
Dosimetric Analysis of Microscopic Disease in SBRT for Lung Cancers
title Dosimetric Analysis of Microscopic Disease in SBRT for Lung Cancers
title_full Dosimetric Analysis of Microscopic Disease in SBRT for Lung Cancers
title_fullStr Dosimetric Analysis of Microscopic Disease in SBRT for Lung Cancers
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Analysis of Microscopic Disease in SBRT for Lung Cancers
title_short Dosimetric Analysis of Microscopic Disease in SBRT for Lung Cancers
title_sort dosimetric analysis of microscopic disease in sbrt for lung cancers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29332497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617734689
work_keys_str_mv AT maoronghu dosimetricanalysisofmicroscopicdiseaseinsbrtforlungcancers
AT tianlingling dosimetricanalysisofmicroscopicdiseaseinsbrtforlungcancers
AT zhangyou dosimetricanalysisofmicroscopicdiseaseinsbrtforlungcancers
AT renlei dosimetricanalysisofmicroscopicdiseaseinsbrtforlungcancers
AT gaorenqi dosimetricanalysisofmicroscopicdiseaseinsbrtforlungcancers
AT yinfangfang dosimetricanalysisofmicroscopicdiseaseinsbrtforlungcancers
AT gehong dosimetricanalysisofmicroscopicdiseaseinsbrtforlungcancers