Cargando…
MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact
In view of their superior soft tissue contrast compared to computed tomography, magnetic resonance images are commonly involved in stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy applications for target delineation purposes. It is known, however, that magnetic resonance images are geometrically distorted, th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29332453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617735454 |
_version_ | 1783291630812397568 |
---|---|
author | Pappas, Eleftherios P. Alshanqity, Mukhtar Moutsatsos, Argyris Lababidi, Hani Alsafi, Khalid Georgiou, Konstantinos Karaiskos, Pantelis Georgiou, Evangelos |
author_facet | Pappas, Eleftherios P. Alshanqity, Mukhtar Moutsatsos, Argyris Lababidi, Hani Alsafi, Khalid Georgiou, Konstantinos Karaiskos, Pantelis Georgiou, Evangelos |
author_sort | Pappas, Eleftherios P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In view of their superior soft tissue contrast compared to computed tomography, magnetic resonance images are commonly involved in stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy applications for target delineation purposes. It is known, however, that magnetic resonance images are geometrically distorted, thus deteriorating dose delivery accuracy. The present work focuses on the assessment of geometric distortion inherent in magnetic resonance images used in stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy treatment planning and attempts to quantitively evaluate the consequent impact on dose delivery. The geometric distortions for 3 clinical magnetic resonance protocols (at both 1.5 and 3.0 T) used for stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy treatment planning were evaluated using a recently proposed phantom and methodology. Areas of increased distortion were identified at the edges of the imaged volume which was comparable to a brain scan. Although mean absolute distortion did not exceed 0.5 mm on any spatial axis, maximum detected control point disposition reached 2 mm. In an effort to establish what could be considered as acceptable geometric uncertainty, highly conformal plans were utilized to irradiate targets of different diameters (5-50 mm). The targets were mispositioned by 0.5 up to 3 mm, and dose–volume histograms and plan quality indices clinically used for plan evaluation and acceptance were derived and used to investigate the effect of geometrical uncertainty (distortion) on dose delivery accuracy and plan quality. The latter was found to be strongly dependent on target size. For targets less than 20 mm in diameter, a spatial disposition of the order of 1 mm could significantly affect (>5%) plan acceptance/quality indices. For targets with diameter greater than 2 cm, the corresponding disposition was found greater than 1.5 mm. Overall results of this work suggest that efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy applications could be compromised in case of very small targets lying distant from the scanner’s isocenter (eg, the periphery of the brain). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5762079 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57620792018-01-17 MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact Pappas, Eleftherios P. Alshanqity, Mukhtar Moutsatsos, Argyris Lababidi, Hani Alsafi, Khalid Georgiou, Konstantinos Karaiskos, Pantelis Georgiou, Evangelos Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Articles In view of their superior soft tissue contrast compared to computed tomography, magnetic resonance images are commonly involved in stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy applications for target delineation purposes. It is known, however, that magnetic resonance images are geometrically distorted, thus deteriorating dose delivery accuracy. The present work focuses on the assessment of geometric distortion inherent in magnetic resonance images used in stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy treatment planning and attempts to quantitively evaluate the consequent impact on dose delivery. The geometric distortions for 3 clinical magnetic resonance protocols (at both 1.5 and 3.0 T) used for stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy treatment planning were evaluated using a recently proposed phantom and methodology. Areas of increased distortion were identified at the edges of the imaged volume which was comparable to a brain scan. Although mean absolute distortion did not exceed 0.5 mm on any spatial axis, maximum detected control point disposition reached 2 mm. In an effort to establish what could be considered as acceptable geometric uncertainty, highly conformal plans were utilized to irradiate targets of different diameters (5-50 mm). The targets were mispositioned by 0.5 up to 3 mm, and dose–volume histograms and plan quality indices clinically used for plan evaluation and acceptance were derived and used to investigate the effect of geometrical uncertainty (distortion) on dose delivery accuracy and plan quality. The latter was found to be strongly dependent on target size. For targets less than 20 mm in diameter, a spatial disposition of the order of 1 mm could significantly affect (>5%) plan acceptance/quality indices. For targets with diameter greater than 2 cm, the corresponding disposition was found greater than 1.5 mm. Overall results of this work suggest that efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy applications could be compromised in case of very small targets lying distant from the scanner’s isocenter (eg, the periphery of the brain). SAGE Publications 2017-10-11 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5762079/ /pubmed/29332453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617735454 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Pappas, Eleftherios P. Alshanqity, Mukhtar Moutsatsos, Argyris Lababidi, Hani Alsafi, Khalid Georgiou, Konstantinos Karaiskos, Pantelis Georgiou, Evangelos MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact |
title | MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact |
title_full | MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact |
title_fullStr | MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact |
title_full_unstemmed | MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact |
title_short | MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact |
title_sort | mri-related geometric distortions in stereotactic radiotherapy treatment planning: evaluation and dosimetric impact |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29332453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617735454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pappaseleftheriosp mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact AT alshanqitymukhtar mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact AT moutsatsosargyris mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact AT lababidihani mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact AT alsafikhalid mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact AT georgioukonstantinos mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact AT karaiskospantelis mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact AT georgiouevangelos mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact |