Cargando…

MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact

In view of their superior soft tissue contrast compared to computed tomography, magnetic resonance images are commonly involved in stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy applications for target delineation purposes. It is known, however, that magnetic resonance images are geometrically distorted, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pappas, Eleftherios P., Alshanqity, Mukhtar, Moutsatsos, Argyris, Lababidi, Hani, Alsafi, Khalid, Georgiou, Konstantinos, Karaiskos, Pantelis, Georgiou, Evangelos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29332453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617735454
_version_ 1783291630812397568
author Pappas, Eleftherios P.
Alshanqity, Mukhtar
Moutsatsos, Argyris
Lababidi, Hani
Alsafi, Khalid
Georgiou, Konstantinos
Karaiskos, Pantelis
Georgiou, Evangelos
author_facet Pappas, Eleftherios P.
Alshanqity, Mukhtar
Moutsatsos, Argyris
Lababidi, Hani
Alsafi, Khalid
Georgiou, Konstantinos
Karaiskos, Pantelis
Georgiou, Evangelos
author_sort Pappas, Eleftherios P.
collection PubMed
description In view of their superior soft tissue contrast compared to computed tomography, magnetic resonance images are commonly involved in stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy applications for target delineation purposes. It is known, however, that magnetic resonance images are geometrically distorted, thus deteriorating dose delivery accuracy. The present work focuses on the assessment of geometric distortion inherent in magnetic resonance images used in stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy treatment planning and attempts to quantitively evaluate the consequent impact on dose delivery. The geometric distortions for 3 clinical magnetic resonance protocols (at both 1.5 and 3.0 T) used for stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy treatment planning were evaluated using a recently proposed phantom and methodology. Areas of increased distortion were identified at the edges of the imaged volume which was comparable to a brain scan. Although mean absolute distortion did not exceed 0.5 mm on any spatial axis, maximum detected control point disposition reached 2 mm. In an effort to establish what could be considered as acceptable geometric uncertainty, highly conformal plans were utilized to irradiate targets of different diameters (5-50 mm). The targets were mispositioned by 0.5 up to 3 mm, and dose–volume histograms and plan quality indices clinically used for plan evaluation and acceptance were derived and used to investigate the effect of geometrical uncertainty (distortion) on dose delivery accuracy and plan quality. The latter was found to be strongly dependent on target size. For targets less than 20 mm in diameter, a spatial disposition of the order of 1 mm could significantly affect (>5%) plan acceptance/quality indices. For targets with diameter greater than 2 cm, the corresponding disposition was found greater than 1.5 mm. Overall results of this work suggest that efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy applications could be compromised in case of very small targets lying distant from the scanner’s isocenter (eg, the periphery of the brain).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5762079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57620792018-01-17 MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact Pappas, Eleftherios P. Alshanqity, Mukhtar Moutsatsos, Argyris Lababidi, Hani Alsafi, Khalid Georgiou, Konstantinos Karaiskos, Pantelis Georgiou, Evangelos Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Articles In view of their superior soft tissue contrast compared to computed tomography, magnetic resonance images are commonly involved in stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy applications for target delineation purposes. It is known, however, that magnetic resonance images are geometrically distorted, thus deteriorating dose delivery accuracy. The present work focuses on the assessment of geometric distortion inherent in magnetic resonance images used in stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy treatment planning and attempts to quantitively evaluate the consequent impact on dose delivery. The geometric distortions for 3 clinical magnetic resonance protocols (at both 1.5 and 3.0 T) used for stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy treatment planning were evaluated using a recently proposed phantom and methodology. Areas of increased distortion were identified at the edges of the imaged volume which was comparable to a brain scan. Although mean absolute distortion did not exceed 0.5 mm on any spatial axis, maximum detected control point disposition reached 2 mm. In an effort to establish what could be considered as acceptable geometric uncertainty, highly conformal plans were utilized to irradiate targets of different diameters (5-50 mm). The targets were mispositioned by 0.5 up to 3 mm, and dose–volume histograms and plan quality indices clinically used for plan evaluation and acceptance were derived and used to investigate the effect of geometrical uncertainty (distortion) on dose delivery accuracy and plan quality. The latter was found to be strongly dependent on target size. For targets less than 20 mm in diameter, a spatial disposition of the order of 1 mm could significantly affect (>5%) plan acceptance/quality indices. For targets with diameter greater than 2 cm, the corresponding disposition was found greater than 1.5 mm. Overall results of this work suggest that efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy applications could be compromised in case of very small targets lying distant from the scanner’s isocenter (eg, the periphery of the brain). SAGE Publications 2017-10-11 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5762079/ /pubmed/29332453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617735454 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Pappas, Eleftherios P.
Alshanqity, Mukhtar
Moutsatsos, Argyris
Lababidi, Hani
Alsafi, Khalid
Georgiou, Konstantinos
Karaiskos, Pantelis
Georgiou, Evangelos
MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact
title MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact
title_full MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact
title_fullStr MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact
title_full_unstemmed MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact
title_short MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact
title_sort mri-related geometric distortions in stereotactic radiotherapy treatment planning: evaluation and dosimetric impact
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29332453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617735454
work_keys_str_mv AT pappaseleftheriosp mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact
AT alshanqitymukhtar mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact
AT moutsatsosargyris mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact
AT lababidihani mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact
AT alsafikhalid mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact
AT georgioukonstantinos mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact
AT karaiskospantelis mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact
AT georgiouevangelos mrirelatedgeometricdistortionsinstereotacticradiotherapytreatmentplanningevaluationanddosimetricimpact