Cargando…
Helical Therapy is Safe for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Despite Limitations in Achieving Sharp Dose Gradients
PURPOSE: We observed that many of our helical therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans did not meet the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recommended R50% (volume of 50% of the prescription dose/planning target volume), which characterizes the steepness of dose fall off. We hypot...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29332448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617740265 |
_version_ | 1783291632563519488 |
---|---|
author | Amin, Neha P. Nalichowski, Adrian Campbell, Shauna Hyder, Jal Spink, Robyn Konski, Andre A. Dominello, Michael |
author_facet | Amin, Neha P. Nalichowski, Adrian Campbell, Shauna Hyder, Jal Spink, Robyn Konski, Andre A. Dominello, Michael |
author_sort | Amin, Neha P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We observed that many of our helical therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans did not meet the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recommended R50% (volume of 50% of the prescription dose/planning target volume), which characterizes the steepness of dose fall off. We hypothesized that despite not meeting R50%, helical therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans would confer similar local control and minimal side effects as previously reported using nonhelical treatment platforms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a retrospective review of all consecutive patients treated off-protocol with stereotactic body radiation therapy for peripheral lung lesions from 2008 to 2013 utilizing helical therapy. Seventy-four patients (81 lesions and 79 plans) were treated with doses ranging from 48 to 60 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions prescribed to the edge of the planning target volume. RESULTS: Forty-eight (61%) plans had major deviation from R50%. Only 1 (<1%) plan had a major deviation from the R100%. All plans had > 95% planning target volume coverage by prescription dose, 7(8.6%) plans with 121% to 133% maximum dose, and lung V20 Gy <10% in 70 (89%) plans. With a median follow-up of 4.7 years (95% confidence interval: 4.1-5.3), local control for all patients at 1, 2, and 5 years was 94.6%, 83.4%, and 74%, respectively. For patients with primary stage I-II lung cancer (n = 46), the 1, 2, and 5-year local control: 97.2%, 94.2%, and 86.9%; RC: 97.6%, 82.5%, and 69.5%; and DM: 3%, 16%, and 33.4%, respectively. Patients treated for lung metastases (n = 26) had worse local control at 1, 2, and 5 years: 94.4%, 69.3%, and 55.5%, respectively. Side effects were rare with 2 (3%) patients reporting chest wall pain and 6 (8%) patients experiencing radiation pneumonitis, including 1 patient who had grade 5 radiation pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Helical therapy delivers a safe and effective lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plan, despite not being able to meet RTOG’s recommended R50 conformality constraint. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5762086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57620862018-01-17 Helical Therapy is Safe for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Despite Limitations in Achieving Sharp Dose Gradients Amin, Neha P. Nalichowski, Adrian Campbell, Shauna Hyder, Jal Spink, Robyn Konski, Andre A. Dominello, Michael Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Articles PURPOSE: We observed that many of our helical therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans did not meet the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recommended R50% (volume of 50% of the prescription dose/planning target volume), which characterizes the steepness of dose fall off. We hypothesized that despite not meeting R50%, helical therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans would confer similar local control and minimal side effects as previously reported using nonhelical treatment platforms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a retrospective review of all consecutive patients treated off-protocol with stereotactic body radiation therapy for peripheral lung lesions from 2008 to 2013 utilizing helical therapy. Seventy-four patients (81 lesions and 79 plans) were treated with doses ranging from 48 to 60 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions prescribed to the edge of the planning target volume. RESULTS: Forty-eight (61%) plans had major deviation from R50%. Only 1 (<1%) plan had a major deviation from the R100%. All plans had > 95% planning target volume coverage by prescription dose, 7(8.6%) plans with 121% to 133% maximum dose, and lung V20 Gy <10% in 70 (89%) plans. With a median follow-up of 4.7 years (95% confidence interval: 4.1-5.3), local control for all patients at 1, 2, and 5 years was 94.6%, 83.4%, and 74%, respectively. For patients with primary stage I-II lung cancer (n = 46), the 1, 2, and 5-year local control: 97.2%, 94.2%, and 86.9%; RC: 97.6%, 82.5%, and 69.5%; and DM: 3%, 16%, and 33.4%, respectively. Patients treated for lung metastases (n = 26) had worse local control at 1, 2, and 5 years: 94.4%, 69.3%, and 55.5%, respectively. Side effects were rare with 2 (3%) patients reporting chest wall pain and 6 (8%) patients experiencing radiation pneumonitis, including 1 patient who had grade 5 radiation pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Helical therapy delivers a safe and effective lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plan, despite not being able to meet RTOG’s recommended R50 conformality constraint. SAGE Publications 2017-11-16 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5762086/ /pubmed/29332448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617740265 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Amin, Neha P. Nalichowski, Adrian Campbell, Shauna Hyder, Jal Spink, Robyn Konski, Andre A. Dominello, Michael Helical Therapy is Safe for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Despite Limitations in Achieving Sharp Dose Gradients |
title | Helical Therapy is Safe for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Despite Limitations in Achieving Sharp Dose Gradients |
title_full | Helical Therapy is Safe for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Despite Limitations in Achieving Sharp Dose Gradients |
title_fullStr | Helical Therapy is Safe for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Despite Limitations in Achieving Sharp Dose Gradients |
title_full_unstemmed | Helical Therapy is Safe for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Despite Limitations in Achieving Sharp Dose Gradients |
title_short | Helical Therapy is Safe for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Despite Limitations in Achieving Sharp Dose Gradients |
title_sort | helical therapy is safe for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy despite limitations in achieving sharp dose gradients |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29332448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533034617740265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aminnehap helicaltherapyissafeforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydespitelimitationsinachievingsharpdosegradients AT nalichowskiadrian helicaltherapyissafeforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydespitelimitationsinachievingsharpdosegradients AT campbellshauna helicaltherapyissafeforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydespitelimitationsinachievingsharpdosegradients AT hyderjal helicaltherapyissafeforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydespitelimitationsinachievingsharpdosegradients AT spinkrobyn helicaltherapyissafeforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydespitelimitationsinachievingsharpdosegradients AT konskiandrea helicaltherapyissafeforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydespitelimitationsinachievingsharpdosegradients AT dominellomichael helicaltherapyissafeforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydespitelimitationsinachievingsharpdosegradients |