Cargando…

Comparison of conventional and supported liquid extraction methods for the determination of sitagliptin and simvastatin in rat plasma by LC–ESI–MS/MS

Three extraction methods were compared for their efficiency to analyze sitagliptin and simvastatin in rat plasma by LC–MS/MS, including (1) liquid–liquid extraction (LLE), (2) solid phase extraction (SPE) and (3) supported liquid extraction (SLE). Comparison of recoveries of analytes with different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramesh, B., Manjula, N., Bijargi, S.R., Sarma, V.U.M., Devi, P. Sita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Xi'an Jiaotong University 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2014.11.003
_version_ 1783291642920304640
author Ramesh, B.
Manjula, N.
Bijargi, S.R.
Sarma, V.U.M.
Devi, P. Sita
author_facet Ramesh, B.
Manjula, N.
Bijargi, S.R.
Sarma, V.U.M.
Devi, P. Sita
author_sort Ramesh, B.
collection PubMed
description Three extraction methods were compared for their efficiency to analyze sitagliptin and simvastatin in rat plasma by LC–MS/MS, including (1) liquid–liquid extraction (LLE), (2) solid phase extraction (SPE) and (3) supported liquid extraction (SLE). Comparison of recoveries of analytes with different extraction methods revealed that SLE was the best extraction method. The detection was facilitated with ion trap-mass spectrometer by multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) in a positive ion mode with ESI. The transitions monitored were m/z 441.1→325.2 for simvastatin, 408.2→235.1 for sitagliptin and 278.1→260.1 for the IS. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.2 ng/mL for sitagliptin and 0.1 ng/mL for simvastatin. The effective SLE offers enhanced chromatographic selectivity, thus facilitating the potential utility of the method for routine analysis of biological samples along with pharmacokinetic studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5762204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Xi'an Jiaotong University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57622042018-02-05 Comparison of conventional and supported liquid extraction methods for the determination of sitagliptin and simvastatin in rat plasma by LC–ESI–MS/MS Ramesh, B. Manjula, N. Bijargi, S.R. Sarma, V.U.M. Devi, P. Sita J Pharm Anal Original Article Three extraction methods were compared for their efficiency to analyze sitagliptin and simvastatin in rat plasma by LC–MS/MS, including (1) liquid–liquid extraction (LLE), (2) solid phase extraction (SPE) and (3) supported liquid extraction (SLE). Comparison of recoveries of analytes with different extraction methods revealed that SLE was the best extraction method. The detection was facilitated with ion trap-mass spectrometer by multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) in a positive ion mode with ESI. The transitions monitored were m/z 441.1→325.2 for simvastatin, 408.2→235.1 for sitagliptin and 278.1→260.1 for the IS. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.2 ng/mL for sitagliptin and 0.1 ng/mL for simvastatin. The effective SLE offers enhanced chromatographic selectivity, thus facilitating the potential utility of the method for routine analysis of biological samples along with pharmacokinetic studies. Xi'an Jiaotong University 2015-06 2014-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5762204/ /pubmed/29403928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2014.11.003 Text en © 2015 Xi’an Jiaotong University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Ramesh, B.
Manjula, N.
Bijargi, S.R.
Sarma, V.U.M.
Devi, P. Sita
Comparison of conventional and supported liquid extraction methods for the determination of sitagliptin and simvastatin in rat plasma by LC–ESI–MS/MS
title Comparison of conventional and supported liquid extraction methods for the determination of sitagliptin and simvastatin in rat plasma by LC–ESI–MS/MS
title_full Comparison of conventional and supported liquid extraction methods for the determination of sitagliptin and simvastatin in rat plasma by LC–ESI–MS/MS
title_fullStr Comparison of conventional and supported liquid extraction methods for the determination of sitagliptin and simvastatin in rat plasma by LC–ESI–MS/MS
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of conventional and supported liquid extraction methods for the determination of sitagliptin and simvastatin in rat plasma by LC–ESI–MS/MS
title_short Comparison of conventional and supported liquid extraction methods for the determination of sitagliptin and simvastatin in rat plasma by LC–ESI–MS/MS
title_sort comparison of conventional and supported liquid extraction methods for the determination of sitagliptin and simvastatin in rat plasma by lc–esi–ms/ms
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2014.11.003
work_keys_str_mv AT rameshb comparisonofconventionalandsupportedliquidextractionmethodsforthedeterminationofsitagliptinandsimvastatininratplasmabylcesimsms
AT manjulan comparisonofconventionalandsupportedliquidextractionmethodsforthedeterminationofsitagliptinandsimvastatininratplasmabylcesimsms
AT bijargisr comparisonofconventionalandsupportedliquidextractionmethodsforthedeterminationofsitagliptinandsimvastatininratplasmabylcesimsms
AT sarmavum comparisonofconventionalandsupportedliquidextractionmethodsforthedeterminationofsitagliptinandsimvastatininratplasmabylcesimsms
AT devipsita comparisonofconventionalandsupportedliquidextractionmethodsforthedeterminationofsitagliptinandsimvastatininratplasmabylcesimsms