Cargando…
A comparison of ARMS-Plus and droplet digital PCR for detecting EGFR activating mutations in plasma
In this study, we introduce a novel amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-based assay, namely ARMS-Plus, for the detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in plasma samples. We evaluated the performance of ARMS-Plus in comparison with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340107 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22997 |
_version_ | 1783291675079081984 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Xinxin Chang, Ning Yang, Guohua Zhang, Yong Ye, Mingxiang Cao, Jing Xiong, Jie Han, Zhiping Wu, Shuo Shang, Lei Zhang, Jian |
author_facet | Zhang, Xinxin Chang, Ning Yang, Guohua Zhang, Yong Ye, Mingxiang Cao, Jing Xiong, Jie Han, Zhiping Wu, Shuo Shang, Lei Zhang, Jian |
author_sort | Zhang, Xinxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we introduce a novel amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-based assay, namely ARMS-Plus, for the detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in plasma samples. We evaluated the performance of ARMS-Plus in comparison with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and assessed the significance of plasma EGFR mutations in predicting efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) regimen. A total of 122 advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were enrolled in this study. The tumor tissue samples from these patients were evaluated by conventional ARMS PCR method to confirm their EGFR mutation status. For the 116 plasma samples analyzed by ARMS-Plus, the sensitivity, specificity, and concordance rate were 77.27% (34/44), 97.22% (70/72), and 89.66% (104/116; κ=0.77, P<0.0001), respectively. Among the 71 plasma samples analyzed by both ARMS-Plus and ddPCR, ARMS-Plus showed a higher sensitivity than ddPCR (83.33% versus 70.83%). The presence of EGFR activating mutations in plasma was not associated with the response to EGFR-TKI, although further validation with a larger cohort is required to confirm the correlation. Collectively, the performance of ARMS-Plus and ddPCR are comparable. ARMS-Plus could be a potential alternative to tissue genotyping for the detection of plasma EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5762375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57623752018-01-16 A comparison of ARMS-Plus and droplet digital PCR for detecting EGFR activating mutations in plasma Zhang, Xinxin Chang, Ning Yang, Guohua Zhang, Yong Ye, Mingxiang Cao, Jing Xiong, Jie Han, Zhiping Wu, Shuo Shang, Lei Zhang, Jian Oncotarget Research Paper In this study, we introduce a novel amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-based assay, namely ARMS-Plus, for the detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in plasma samples. We evaluated the performance of ARMS-Plus in comparison with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and assessed the significance of plasma EGFR mutations in predicting efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) regimen. A total of 122 advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were enrolled in this study. The tumor tissue samples from these patients were evaluated by conventional ARMS PCR method to confirm their EGFR mutation status. For the 116 plasma samples analyzed by ARMS-Plus, the sensitivity, specificity, and concordance rate were 77.27% (34/44), 97.22% (70/72), and 89.66% (104/116; κ=0.77, P<0.0001), respectively. Among the 71 plasma samples analyzed by both ARMS-Plus and ddPCR, ARMS-Plus showed a higher sensitivity than ddPCR (83.33% versus 70.83%). The presence of EGFR activating mutations in plasma was not associated with the response to EGFR-TKI, although further validation with a larger cohort is required to confirm the correlation. Collectively, the performance of ARMS-Plus and ddPCR are comparable. ARMS-Plus could be a potential alternative to tissue genotyping for the detection of plasma EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients. Impact Journals LLC 2017-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5762375/ /pubmed/29340107 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22997 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Zhang, Xinxin Chang, Ning Yang, Guohua Zhang, Yong Ye, Mingxiang Cao, Jing Xiong, Jie Han, Zhiping Wu, Shuo Shang, Lei Zhang, Jian A comparison of ARMS-Plus and droplet digital PCR for detecting EGFR activating mutations in plasma |
title | A comparison of ARMS-Plus and droplet digital PCR for detecting EGFR activating mutations in plasma |
title_full | A comparison of ARMS-Plus and droplet digital PCR for detecting EGFR activating mutations in plasma |
title_fullStr | A comparison of ARMS-Plus and droplet digital PCR for detecting EGFR activating mutations in plasma |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of ARMS-Plus and droplet digital PCR for detecting EGFR activating mutations in plasma |
title_short | A comparison of ARMS-Plus and droplet digital PCR for detecting EGFR activating mutations in plasma |
title_sort | comparison of arms-plus and droplet digital pcr for detecting egfr activating mutations in plasma |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340107 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxinxin acomparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT changning acomparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT yangguohua acomparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT zhangyong acomparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT yemingxiang acomparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT caojing acomparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT xiongjie acomparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT hanzhiping acomparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT wushuo acomparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT shanglei acomparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT zhangjian acomparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT zhangxinxin comparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT changning comparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT yangguohua comparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT zhangyong comparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT yemingxiang comparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT caojing comparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT xiongjie comparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT hanzhiping comparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT wushuo comparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT shanglei comparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma AT zhangjian comparisonofarmsplusanddropletdigitalpcrfordetectingegfractivatingmutationsinplasma |