Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Emerging studies demonstrate the diagnostic utility of DNA methylation-based blood test for gastric cancer. The aim of the meta-analysis is to evaluate the accuracy of blood DNA methylation markers for detecting patients with gastric cancer. A systematic literature search to November 2016 that evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Weiling, Zheng, Wenfang, Liu, Qifang, Chu, Hua, Chen, Shujie, Kim, John J., Wu, Jiaguo, Si, Jianmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29348893
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22613
_version_ 1783291714552725504
author Hu, Weiling
Zheng, Wenfang
Liu, Qifang
Chu, Hua
Chen, Shujie
Kim, John J.
Wu, Jiaguo
Si, Jianmin
author_facet Hu, Weiling
Zheng, Wenfang
Liu, Qifang
Chu, Hua
Chen, Shujie
Kim, John J.
Wu, Jiaguo
Si, Jianmin
author_sort Hu, Weiling
collection PubMed
description Emerging studies demonstrate the diagnostic utility of DNA methylation-based blood test for gastric cancer. The aim of the meta-analysis is to evaluate the accuracy of blood DNA methylation markers for detecting patients with gastric cancer. A systematic literature search to November 2016 that evaluated DNA methylation markers utilizing blood specimen to detect gastric cancer were selected to derive pooled sensitivities and specificities. 32 studies including 4,172 patients (gastric cancer (N = 2,098), control (N = 2,074)) met the study criteria. Overall sensitivity of DNA methylation-based blood test for detecting gastric cancer was 57% (95% CI 50–63%); specificity was 97% (95% CI 95–98%). Among patients who received plasma-based testing, sensitivity was 71% (95% CI 59–81%); specificity was 89% (95% CI 78–94%). Among patients who received serum-based testing, sensitivity was 50% (95% CI 43–58%); specificity was 98% (95% CI 96–99%). Using multiple methylated genes had sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 64–84%); specificity of 85% (95% CI 65–95%). DNA methylation test had sensitivity of 55% (95% CI 47–64%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI 92–98%) for detecting TNM stage I+II gastric cancer. In conclusion, blood-based DNA methylation test had high specificity but modest sensitivity for detecting gastric cancer. Evaluating multiple methylated genes or using plasma sample may improve the diagnostic sensitivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5762578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57625782018-01-18 Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis Hu, Weiling Zheng, Wenfang Liu, Qifang Chu, Hua Chen, Shujie Kim, John J. Wu, Jiaguo Si, Jianmin Oncotarget Meta-Analysis Emerging studies demonstrate the diagnostic utility of DNA methylation-based blood test for gastric cancer. The aim of the meta-analysis is to evaluate the accuracy of blood DNA methylation markers for detecting patients with gastric cancer. A systematic literature search to November 2016 that evaluated DNA methylation markers utilizing blood specimen to detect gastric cancer were selected to derive pooled sensitivities and specificities. 32 studies including 4,172 patients (gastric cancer (N = 2,098), control (N = 2,074)) met the study criteria. Overall sensitivity of DNA methylation-based blood test for detecting gastric cancer was 57% (95% CI 50–63%); specificity was 97% (95% CI 95–98%). Among patients who received plasma-based testing, sensitivity was 71% (95% CI 59–81%); specificity was 89% (95% CI 78–94%). Among patients who received serum-based testing, sensitivity was 50% (95% CI 43–58%); specificity was 98% (95% CI 96–99%). Using multiple methylated genes had sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 64–84%); specificity of 85% (95% CI 65–95%). DNA methylation test had sensitivity of 55% (95% CI 47–64%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI 92–98%) for detecting TNM stage I+II gastric cancer. In conclusion, blood-based DNA methylation test had high specificity but modest sensitivity for detecting gastric cancer. Evaluating multiple methylated genes or using plasma sample may improve the diagnostic sensitivity. Impact Journals LLC 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5762578/ /pubmed/29348893 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22613 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Hu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Hu, Weiling
Zheng, Wenfang
Liu, Qifang
Chu, Hua
Chen, Shujie
Kim, John J.
Wu, Jiaguo
Si, Jianmin
Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of dna methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29348893
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22613
work_keys_str_mv AT huweiling diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT zhengwenfang diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT liuqifang diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT chuhua diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT chenshujie diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT kimjohnj diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT wujiaguo diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT sijianmin diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis