Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
Emerging studies demonstrate the diagnostic utility of DNA methylation-based blood test for gastric cancer. The aim of the meta-analysis is to evaluate the accuracy of blood DNA methylation markers for detecting patients with gastric cancer. A systematic literature search to November 2016 that evalu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29348893 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22613 |
_version_ | 1783291714552725504 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Weiling Zheng, Wenfang Liu, Qifang Chu, Hua Chen, Shujie Kim, John J. Wu, Jiaguo Si, Jianmin |
author_facet | Hu, Weiling Zheng, Wenfang Liu, Qifang Chu, Hua Chen, Shujie Kim, John J. Wu, Jiaguo Si, Jianmin |
author_sort | Hu, Weiling |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emerging studies demonstrate the diagnostic utility of DNA methylation-based blood test for gastric cancer. The aim of the meta-analysis is to evaluate the accuracy of blood DNA methylation markers for detecting patients with gastric cancer. A systematic literature search to November 2016 that evaluated DNA methylation markers utilizing blood specimen to detect gastric cancer were selected to derive pooled sensitivities and specificities. 32 studies including 4,172 patients (gastric cancer (N = 2,098), control (N = 2,074)) met the study criteria. Overall sensitivity of DNA methylation-based blood test for detecting gastric cancer was 57% (95% CI 50–63%); specificity was 97% (95% CI 95–98%). Among patients who received plasma-based testing, sensitivity was 71% (95% CI 59–81%); specificity was 89% (95% CI 78–94%). Among patients who received serum-based testing, sensitivity was 50% (95% CI 43–58%); specificity was 98% (95% CI 96–99%). Using multiple methylated genes had sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 64–84%); specificity of 85% (95% CI 65–95%). DNA methylation test had sensitivity of 55% (95% CI 47–64%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI 92–98%) for detecting TNM stage I+II gastric cancer. In conclusion, blood-based DNA methylation test had high specificity but modest sensitivity for detecting gastric cancer. Evaluating multiple methylated genes or using plasma sample may improve the diagnostic sensitivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5762578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57625782018-01-18 Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis Hu, Weiling Zheng, Wenfang Liu, Qifang Chu, Hua Chen, Shujie Kim, John J. Wu, Jiaguo Si, Jianmin Oncotarget Meta-Analysis Emerging studies demonstrate the diagnostic utility of DNA methylation-based blood test for gastric cancer. The aim of the meta-analysis is to evaluate the accuracy of blood DNA methylation markers for detecting patients with gastric cancer. A systematic literature search to November 2016 that evaluated DNA methylation markers utilizing blood specimen to detect gastric cancer were selected to derive pooled sensitivities and specificities. 32 studies including 4,172 patients (gastric cancer (N = 2,098), control (N = 2,074)) met the study criteria. Overall sensitivity of DNA methylation-based blood test for detecting gastric cancer was 57% (95% CI 50–63%); specificity was 97% (95% CI 95–98%). Among patients who received plasma-based testing, sensitivity was 71% (95% CI 59–81%); specificity was 89% (95% CI 78–94%). Among patients who received serum-based testing, sensitivity was 50% (95% CI 43–58%); specificity was 98% (95% CI 96–99%). Using multiple methylated genes had sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 64–84%); specificity of 85% (95% CI 65–95%). DNA methylation test had sensitivity of 55% (95% CI 47–64%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI 92–98%) for detecting TNM stage I+II gastric cancer. In conclusion, blood-based DNA methylation test had high specificity but modest sensitivity for detecting gastric cancer. Evaluating multiple methylated genes or using plasma sample may improve the diagnostic sensitivity. Impact Journals LLC 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5762578/ /pubmed/29348893 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22613 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Hu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Hu, Weiling Zheng, Wenfang Liu, Qifang Chu, Hua Chen, Shujie Kim, John J. Wu, Jiaguo Si, Jianmin Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of dna methylation in detection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29348893 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22613 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huweiling diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis AT zhengwenfang diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis AT liuqifang diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis AT chuhua diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis AT chenshujie diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis AT kimjohnj diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis AT wujiaguo diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis AT sijianmin diagnosticaccuracyofdnamethylationindetectionofgastriccancerametaanalysis |