Cargando…

Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery on advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in comparison with conventional open surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery (LCS) from March 2007 to December...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Huamao, Guo, Hongyan, Zhang, Chunyu, Zhu, FuLi, Wu, Yu, Zhang, Kun, Li, Hua, Han, Jinsong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29348902
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22573
_version_ 1783291716692869120
author Liang, Huamao
Guo, Hongyan
Zhang, Chunyu
Zhu, FuLi
Wu, Yu
Zhang, Kun
Li, Hua
Han, Jinsong
author_facet Liang, Huamao
Guo, Hongyan
Zhang, Chunyu
Zhu, FuLi
Wu, Yu
Zhang, Kun
Li, Hua
Han, Jinsong
author_sort Liang, Huamao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery on advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in comparison with conventional open surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery (LCS) from March 2007 to December 2016 were matched to controls treated with laparotomic cytoreduction during the same period. Procedural data and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The LCS group (n = 64) and laparotomic group (n = 68) had similar age, BMI, stages, histologic type and grading. The LCS group exhibited significantly less operating time (P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), and shorter time to recover postoperatively (P = 0.002). No statistical difference was observed for the number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes dissected (P = 0.326 and P = 0.151). Significant difference was observed in satisfaction of the cytoreduction (95.3% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.008). No significant difference were observed either in intra-operative or in post-operative complications between the two groups (P = 0.250). Three patients in the LCS group experienced intra-operative complications (4.7%) and were all treated laparoscopically. The conversion rate was 3.1%. No significant differences were observed in the progression-free survival and overall survival between the two groups during the medium follow-up of 18 months (P = 0.236 and P = 0.216). The 2-year and 3-year progression-free survival was 67.9%, 55.5% in LCS group and 53.8%, 33.3% respectively in the control group. The 2-year and 3-year overall survival was 95.8%, 88.7% respectively in the LCS group and 89.0%, 83.7% in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery in some strictly selected advanced stages of EOC patients was feasible and safe, resulting in oncologic outcomes not inferior to those in open surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5762587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57625872018-01-18 Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts Liang, Huamao Guo, Hongyan Zhang, Chunyu Zhu, FuLi Wu, Yu Zhang, Kun Li, Hua Han, Jinsong Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery on advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in comparison with conventional open surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery (LCS) from March 2007 to December 2016 were matched to controls treated with laparotomic cytoreduction during the same period. Procedural data and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The LCS group (n = 64) and laparotomic group (n = 68) had similar age, BMI, stages, histologic type and grading. The LCS group exhibited significantly less operating time (P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), and shorter time to recover postoperatively (P = 0.002). No statistical difference was observed for the number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes dissected (P = 0.326 and P = 0.151). Significant difference was observed in satisfaction of the cytoreduction (95.3% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.008). No significant difference were observed either in intra-operative or in post-operative complications between the two groups (P = 0.250). Three patients in the LCS group experienced intra-operative complications (4.7%) and were all treated laparoscopically. The conversion rate was 3.1%. No significant differences were observed in the progression-free survival and overall survival between the two groups during the medium follow-up of 18 months (P = 0.236 and P = 0.216). The 2-year and 3-year progression-free survival was 67.9%, 55.5% in LCS group and 53.8%, 33.3% respectively in the control group. The 2-year and 3-year overall survival was 95.8%, 88.7% respectively in the LCS group and 89.0%, 83.7% in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery in some strictly selected advanced stages of EOC patients was feasible and safe, resulting in oncologic outcomes not inferior to those in open surgery. Impact Journals LLC 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5762587/ /pubmed/29348902 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22573 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Liang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Paper
Liang, Huamao
Guo, Hongyan
Zhang, Chunyu
Zhu, FuLi
Wu, Yu
Zhang, Kun
Li, Hua
Han, Jinsong
Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts
title Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts
title_full Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts
title_fullStr Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts
title_short Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts
title_sort feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts
topic Clinical Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29348902
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22573
work_keys_str_mv AT lianghuamao feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts
AT guohongyan feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts
AT zhangchunyu feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts
AT zhufuli feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts
AT wuyu feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts
AT zhangkun feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts
AT lihua feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts
AT hanjinsong feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts