Cargando…
Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts
OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery on advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in comparison with conventional open surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery (LCS) from March 2007 to December...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29348902 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22573 |
_version_ | 1783291716692869120 |
---|---|
author | Liang, Huamao Guo, Hongyan Zhang, Chunyu Zhu, FuLi Wu, Yu Zhang, Kun Li, Hua Han, Jinsong |
author_facet | Liang, Huamao Guo, Hongyan Zhang, Chunyu Zhu, FuLi Wu, Yu Zhang, Kun Li, Hua Han, Jinsong |
author_sort | Liang, Huamao |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery on advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in comparison with conventional open surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery (LCS) from March 2007 to December 2016 were matched to controls treated with laparotomic cytoreduction during the same period. Procedural data and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The LCS group (n = 64) and laparotomic group (n = 68) had similar age, BMI, stages, histologic type and grading. The LCS group exhibited significantly less operating time (P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), and shorter time to recover postoperatively (P = 0.002). No statistical difference was observed for the number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes dissected (P = 0.326 and P = 0.151). Significant difference was observed in satisfaction of the cytoreduction (95.3% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.008). No significant difference were observed either in intra-operative or in post-operative complications between the two groups (P = 0.250). Three patients in the LCS group experienced intra-operative complications (4.7%) and were all treated laparoscopically. The conversion rate was 3.1%. No significant differences were observed in the progression-free survival and overall survival between the two groups during the medium follow-up of 18 months (P = 0.236 and P = 0.216). The 2-year and 3-year progression-free survival was 67.9%, 55.5% in LCS group and 53.8%, 33.3% respectively in the control group. The 2-year and 3-year overall survival was 95.8%, 88.7% respectively in the LCS group and 89.0%, 83.7% in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery in some strictly selected advanced stages of EOC patients was feasible and safe, resulting in oncologic outcomes not inferior to those in open surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5762587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57625872018-01-18 Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts Liang, Huamao Guo, Hongyan Zhang, Chunyu Zhu, FuLi Wu, Yu Zhang, Kun Li, Hua Han, Jinsong Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery on advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in comparison with conventional open surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery (LCS) from March 2007 to December 2016 were matched to controls treated with laparotomic cytoreduction during the same period. Procedural data and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The LCS group (n = 64) and laparotomic group (n = 68) had similar age, BMI, stages, histologic type and grading. The LCS group exhibited significantly less operating time (P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), and shorter time to recover postoperatively (P = 0.002). No statistical difference was observed for the number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes dissected (P = 0.326 and P = 0.151). Significant difference was observed in satisfaction of the cytoreduction (95.3% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.008). No significant difference were observed either in intra-operative or in post-operative complications between the two groups (P = 0.250). Three patients in the LCS group experienced intra-operative complications (4.7%) and were all treated laparoscopically. The conversion rate was 3.1%. No significant differences were observed in the progression-free survival and overall survival between the two groups during the medium follow-up of 18 months (P = 0.236 and P = 0.216). The 2-year and 3-year progression-free survival was 67.9%, 55.5% in LCS group and 53.8%, 33.3% respectively in the control group. The 2-year and 3-year overall survival was 95.8%, 88.7% respectively in the LCS group and 89.0%, 83.7% in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery in some strictly selected advanced stages of EOC patients was feasible and safe, resulting in oncologic outcomes not inferior to those in open surgery. Impact Journals LLC 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5762587/ /pubmed/29348902 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22573 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Liang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Paper Liang, Huamao Guo, Hongyan Zhang, Chunyu Zhu, FuLi Wu, Yu Zhang, Kun Li, Hua Han, Jinsong Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts |
title | Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts |
title_full | Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts |
title_short | Feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts |
title_sort | feasibility and outcome of primary laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison to laparotomic surgery in retrospective cohorts |
topic | Clinical Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29348902 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22573 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lianghuamao feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts AT guohongyan feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts AT zhangchunyu feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts AT zhufuli feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts AT wuyu feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts AT zhangkun feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts AT lihua feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts AT hanjinsong feasibilityandoutcomeofprimarylaparoscopiccytoreductivesurgeryforadvancedepithelialovariancanceracomparisontolaparotomicsurgeryinretrospectivecohorts |