Cargando…

Radioembolization Versus Bland Embolization for Hepatic Metastases from Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Short-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Radioembolization (RE) with intra-arterial administration of (90)Y microspheres is a promising technique for the treatment of liver metastases from small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NET) not amenable to surgery or local ablation. However, studies comparing RE to other loco-regio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elf, Anna-Karin, Andersson, Mats, Henrikson, Olof, Jalnefjord, Oscar, Ljungberg, Maria, Svensson, Johanna, Wängberg, Bo, Johanson, Viktor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4324-9
_version_ 1783291764141981696
author Elf, Anna-Karin
Andersson, Mats
Henrikson, Olof
Jalnefjord, Oscar
Ljungberg, Maria
Svensson, Johanna
Wängberg, Bo
Johanson, Viktor
author_facet Elf, Anna-Karin
Andersson, Mats
Henrikson, Olof
Jalnefjord, Oscar
Ljungberg, Maria
Svensson, Johanna
Wängberg, Bo
Johanson, Viktor
author_sort Elf, Anna-Karin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radioembolization (RE) with intra-arterial administration of (90)Y microspheres is a promising technique for the treatment of liver metastases from small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NET) not amenable to surgery or local ablation. However, studies comparing RE to other loco-regional therapies are lacking. The aim of this randomized study was to compare the therapeutic response and safety after RE and bland hepatic arterial embolization (HAE), and to investigate early therapy-induced changes with diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI-MRI). METHODS: Eleven patients were included in a prospective randomized controlled pilot study, six assigned to RE and five to HAE. Response according to RECIST 1.1 using MRI or CT at 3 and 6 months post-treatment was recorded as well as changes in DWI-MRI parameters after 1 month. Data on biochemical tumor response, toxicity, and side effects were also collected. RESULTS: Three months after treatment, all patients in the HAE group showed partial response according to RECIST while none in the RE group did (p = 0.0022). After 6 months, the response rates were 4/5 (80%) and 2/6 (33%) in the HAE and RE groups, respectively (NS). DWI-MRI metrics could not predict RECIST response, but lower pretreatment ADC((120–800)) and larger ADC((0–800)) increase at 1 month were related to larger decrease in tumor diameter when all tumors were counted. CONCLUSION: HAE resulted in significantly higher RECIST response after 3 months, but no difference compared to RE remained after 6 months. These preliminary findings indicate that HAE remains a safe option for the treatment of liver metastases from SI-NET, and further studies are needed to establish the role of RE and the predictive value of MR-DWI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-017-4324-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5762793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57627932018-01-25 Radioembolization Versus Bland Embolization for Hepatic Metastases from Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Short-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial Elf, Anna-Karin Andersson, Mats Henrikson, Olof Jalnefjord, Oscar Ljungberg, Maria Svensson, Johanna Wängberg, Bo Johanson, Viktor World J Surg Original Scientific Report BACKGROUND: Radioembolization (RE) with intra-arterial administration of (90)Y microspheres is a promising technique for the treatment of liver metastases from small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NET) not amenable to surgery or local ablation. However, studies comparing RE to other loco-regional therapies are lacking. The aim of this randomized study was to compare the therapeutic response and safety after RE and bland hepatic arterial embolization (HAE), and to investigate early therapy-induced changes with diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI-MRI). METHODS: Eleven patients were included in a prospective randomized controlled pilot study, six assigned to RE and five to HAE. Response according to RECIST 1.1 using MRI or CT at 3 and 6 months post-treatment was recorded as well as changes in DWI-MRI parameters after 1 month. Data on biochemical tumor response, toxicity, and side effects were also collected. RESULTS: Three months after treatment, all patients in the HAE group showed partial response according to RECIST while none in the RE group did (p = 0.0022). After 6 months, the response rates were 4/5 (80%) and 2/6 (33%) in the HAE and RE groups, respectively (NS). DWI-MRI metrics could not predict RECIST response, but lower pretreatment ADC((120–800)) and larger ADC((0–800)) increase at 1 month were related to larger decrease in tumor diameter when all tumors were counted. CONCLUSION: HAE resulted in significantly higher RECIST response after 3 months, but no difference compared to RE remained after 6 months. These preliminary findings indicate that HAE remains a safe option for the treatment of liver metastases from SI-NET, and further studies are needed to establish the role of RE and the predictive value of MR-DWI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-017-4324-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-11-22 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5762793/ /pubmed/29167951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4324-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Report
Elf, Anna-Karin
Andersson, Mats
Henrikson, Olof
Jalnefjord, Oscar
Ljungberg, Maria
Svensson, Johanna
Wängberg, Bo
Johanson, Viktor
Radioembolization Versus Bland Embolization for Hepatic Metastases from Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Short-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
title Radioembolization Versus Bland Embolization for Hepatic Metastases from Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Short-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Radioembolization Versus Bland Embolization for Hepatic Metastases from Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Short-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Radioembolization Versus Bland Embolization for Hepatic Metastases from Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Short-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Radioembolization Versus Bland Embolization for Hepatic Metastases from Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Short-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Radioembolization Versus Bland Embolization for Hepatic Metastases from Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Short-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort radioembolization versus bland embolization for hepatic metastases from small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Scientific Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4324-9
work_keys_str_mv AT elfannakarin radioembolizationversusblandembolizationforhepaticmetastasesfromsmallintestinalneuroendocrinetumorsshorttermresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT anderssonmats radioembolizationversusblandembolizationforhepaticmetastasesfromsmallintestinalneuroendocrinetumorsshorttermresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT henriksonolof radioembolizationversusblandembolizationforhepaticmetastasesfromsmallintestinalneuroendocrinetumorsshorttermresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jalnefjordoscar radioembolizationversusblandembolizationforhepaticmetastasesfromsmallintestinalneuroendocrinetumorsshorttermresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ljungbergmaria radioembolizationversusblandembolizationforhepaticmetastasesfromsmallintestinalneuroendocrinetumorsshorttermresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT svenssonjohanna radioembolizationversusblandembolizationforhepaticmetastasesfromsmallintestinalneuroendocrinetumorsshorttermresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wangbergbo radioembolizationversusblandembolizationforhepaticmetastasesfromsmallintestinalneuroendocrinetumorsshorttermresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT johansonviktor radioembolizationversusblandembolizationforhepaticmetastasesfromsmallintestinalneuroendocrinetumorsshorttermresultsofarandomizedclinicaltrial