Cargando…
Matrix stimulation in cancer pain: Methodology, safety and effectiveness
BACKGROUND: This feasibility study addresses the applicability of matrix electrodes for the reduction of ongoing pain in cancer patients via low‐frequency electrical stimulation (LFS). METHODS: Low‐frequency matrix stimulation (4 Hz) was applied to the skin within the ‘Head's zones’ referring t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28805336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1089 |
_version_ | 1783291878258507776 |
---|---|
author | Mücke, M. Tils, M. Conrad, R. Kravchenko, D. Cuhls, H. Radbruch, L. Marinova, M. Peuckmann‐Post, V. Rolke, R. |
author_facet | Mücke, M. Tils, M. Conrad, R. Kravchenko, D. Cuhls, H. Radbruch, L. Marinova, M. Peuckmann‐Post, V. Rolke, R. |
author_sort | Mücke, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This feasibility study addresses the applicability of matrix electrodes for the reduction of ongoing pain in cancer patients via low‐frequency electrical stimulation (LFS). METHODS: Low‐frequency matrix stimulation (4 Hz) was applied to the skin within the ‘Head's zones’ referring to the tumour localization of cancer pain patients. Pain at baseline was compared to a 3‐day treatment interval consisting of 5 min of matrix stimulation in the morning and evening followed by a 3‐day follow‐up period without therapy. Main outcome parameters included numeric rating scale values (rating scale 0–100), painDETECT, HADS, and German pain questionnaire, as well as the opioid intake, calculated as the oral morphine equivalent (OME). RESULTS: Twenty patients with cancer pain (aged 64.4 ± 10.3; 9 women) were examined. In the majority of patients, the pain was classified as nociceptive. The mean pain reduction achieved by matrix therapy was 30%, under stable daily controlled‐release opioid doses between 177 and 184 mg/day (OME). Seventeen patients (85%) were responders, defined by a pain reduction of at least 30%, while four responders experienced a pain reduction of over 50%. The only side effect was short‐term erythema. CONCLUSION: Findings are consistent with the concept of synaptic long‐term depression in cancer pain induced after conditioning LFS. Despite the short, but well‐tolerated, treatment duration of 2 × 5 min/day, effects persisted throughout the 3‐day follow‐up. SIGNIFICANCE: Cutaneous neuromodulation using LFS via a matrix electrode has been shown to be a safe intervention for effectively reducing cancer pain in palliative care patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5763394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57633942018-01-17 Matrix stimulation in cancer pain: Methodology, safety and effectiveness Mücke, M. Tils, M. Conrad, R. Kravchenko, D. Cuhls, H. Radbruch, L. Marinova, M. Peuckmann‐Post, V. Rolke, R. Eur J Pain Original Research BACKGROUND: This feasibility study addresses the applicability of matrix electrodes for the reduction of ongoing pain in cancer patients via low‐frequency electrical stimulation (LFS). METHODS: Low‐frequency matrix stimulation (4 Hz) was applied to the skin within the ‘Head's zones’ referring to the tumour localization of cancer pain patients. Pain at baseline was compared to a 3‐day treatment interval consisting of 5 min of matrix stimulation in the morning and evening followed by a 3‐day follow‐up period without therapy. Main outcome parameters included numeric rating scale values (rating scale 0–100), painDETECT, HADS, and German pain questionnaire, as well as the opioid intake, calculated as the oral morphine equivalent (OME). RESULTS: Twenty patients with cancer pain (aged 64.4 ± 10.3; 9 women) were examined. In the majority of patients, the pain was classified as nociceptive. The mean pain reduction achieved by matrix therapy was 30%, under stable daily controlled‐release opioid doses between 177 and 184 mg/day (OME). Seventeen patients (85%) were responders, defined by a pain reduction of at least 30%, while four responders experienced a pain reduction of over 50%. The only side effect was short‐term erythema. CONCLUSION: Findings are consistent with the concept of synaptic long‐term depression in cancer pain induced after conditioning LFS. Despite the short, but well‐tolerated, treatment duration of 2 × 5 min/day, effects persisted throughout the 3‐day follow‐up. SIGNIFICANCE: Cutaneous neuromodulation using LFS via a matrix electrode has been shown to be a safe intervention for effectively reducing cancer pain in palliative care patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-14 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5763394/ /pubmed/28805336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1089 Text en © 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐EFIC® This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mücke, M. Tils, M. Conrad, R. Kravchenko, D. Cuhls, H. Radbruch, L. Marinova, M. Peuckmann‐Post, V. Rolke, R. Matrix stimulation in cancer pain: Methodology, safety and effectiveness |
title | Matrix stimulation in cancer pain: Methodology, safety and effectiveness |
title_full | Matrix stimulation in cancer pain: Methodology, safety and effectiveness |
title_fullStr | Matrix stimulation in cancer pain: Methodology, safety and effectiveness |
title_full_unstemmed | Matrix stimulation in cancer pain: Methodology, safety and effectiveness |
title_short | Matrix stimulation in cancer pain: Methodology, safety and effectiveness |
title_sort | matrix stimulation in cancer pain: methodology, safety and effectiveness |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28805336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muckem matrixstimulationincancerpainmethodologysafetyandeffectiveness AT tilsm matrixstimulationincancerpainmethodologysafetyandeffectiveness AT conradr matrixstimulationincancerpainmethodologysafetyandeffectiveness AT kravchenkod matrixstimulationincancerpainmethodologysafetyandeffectiveness AT cuhlsh matrixstimulationincancerpainmethodologysafetyandeffectiveness AT radbruchl matrixstimulationincancerpainmethodologysafetyandeffectiveness AT marinovam matrixstimulationincancerpainmethodologysafetyandeffectiveness AT peuckmannpostv matrixstimulationincancerpainmethodologysafetyandeffectiveness AT rolker matrixstimulationincancerpainmethodologysafetyandeffectiveness |