Cargando…

Identification of prognostic signature in cancer based on DNA methylation interaction network

BACKGROUND: The identification of prognostic biomarkers for cancer patients is essential for cancer research. These days, DNA methylation has been proved to be associated with cancer prognosis. However, there are few methods which identify the prognostic markers based on DNA methylation data systema...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Wei-Lin, Zhou, Xiong-Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29322932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0307-9
_version_ 1783291885166526464
author Hu, Wei-Lin
Zhou, Xiong-Hui
author_facet Hu, Wei-Lin
Zhou, Xiong-Hui
author_sort Hu, Wei-Lin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The identification of prognostic biomarkers for cancer patients is essential for cancer research. These days, DNA methylation has been proved to be associated with cancer prognosis. However, there are few methods which identify the prognostic markers based on DNA methylation data systematically, especially considering the interaction among DNA methylation sites. METHODS: In this paper, we first evaluated the stabilities of microRNA, mRNA, and DNA methylation data in prognosis of cancer. After that, a rank-based method was applied to construct a DNA methylation interaction network. In this network, nodes with the largest degrees (10% of all the nodes) were selected as hubs. Cox regression was applied to select the hubs as prognostic signature. In this prognostic signature, DNA methylation levels of each DNA methylation site are correlated with the outcomes of cancer patients. After obtaining these prognostic genes, we performed the survival analysis in the training group and the test group to verify the reliability of these genes. RESULTS: We applied our method in three cancers (ovarian cancer, breast cancer and Glioblastoma Multiforme). In all the three cancers, there are more common ones of prognostic genes selected from different samples in DNA methylation data, compared with gene expression data and miRNA expression data, which indicates the DNA methylation data may be more stable in cancer prognosis. Power-law distribution fitting suggests that the DNA methylation interaction networks are scale-free. And the hubs selected from the three networks are all enriched by cancer related pathways. The gene signatures were obtained for the three cancers respectively, and survival analysis shows they can distinguish the outcomes of tumor patients in both the training data sets and test data sets, which outperformed the control signatures. CONCLUSIONS: A computational method was proposed to construct DNA methylation interaction network and this network could be used to select prognostic signatures in cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12920-017-0307-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5763425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57634252018-01-17 Identification of prognostic signature in cancer based on DNA methylation interaction network Hu, Wei-Lin Zhou, Xiong-Hui BMC Med Genomics Research BACKGROUND: The identification of prognostic biomarkers for cancer patients is essential for cancer research. These days, DNA methylation has been proved to be associated with cancer prognosis. However, there are few methods which identify the prognostic markers based on DNA methylation data systematically, especially considering the interaction among DNA methylation sites. METHODS: In this paper, we first evaluated the stabilities of microRNA, mRNA, and DNA methylation data in prognosis of cancer. After that, a rank-based method was applied to construct a DNA methylation interaction network. In this network, nodes with the largest degrees (10% of all the nodes) were selected as hubs. Cox regression was applied to select the hubs as prognostic signature. In this prognostic signature, DNA methylation levels of each DNA methylation site are correlated with the outcomes of cancer patients. After obtaining these prognostic genes, we performed the survival analysis in the training group and the test group to verify the reliability of these genes. RESULTS: We applied our method in three cancers (ovarian cancer, breast cancer and Glioblastoma Multiforme). In all the three cancers, there are more common ones of prognostic genes selected from different samples in DNA methylation data, compared with gene expression data and miRNA expression data, which indicates the DNA methylation data may be more stable in cancer prognosis. Power-law distribution fitting suggests that the DNA methylation interaction networks are scale-free. And the hubs selected from the three networks are all enriched by cancer related pathways. The gene signatures were obtained for the three cancers respectively, and survival analysis shows they can distinguish the outcomes of tumor patients in both the training data sets and test data sets, which outperformed the control signatures. CONCLUSIONS: A computational method was proposed to construct DNA methylation interaction network and this network could be used to select prognostic signatures in cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12920-017-0307-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5763425/ /pubmed/29322932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0307-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hu, Wei-Lin
Zhou, Xiong-Hui
Identification of prognostic signature in cancer based on DNA methylation interaction network
title Identification of prognostic signature in cancer based on DNA methylation interaction network
title_full Identification of prognostic signature in cancer based on DNA methylation interaction network
title_fullStr Identification of prognostic signature in cancer based on DNA methylation interaction network
title_full_unstemmed Identification of prognostic signature in cancer based on DNA methylation interaction network
title_short Identification of prognostic signature in cancer based on DNA methylation interaction network
title_sort identification of prognostic signature in cancer based on dna methylation interaction network
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29322932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0307-9
work_keys_str_mv AT huweilin identificationofprognosticsignatureincancerbasedondnamethylationinteractionnetwork
AT zhouxionghui identificationofprognosticsignatureincancerbasedondnamethylationinteractionnetwork