Cargando…
Cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping
BACKGROUND: A fundamental characteristic of multicellular organisms is the specialization of functional cell types through the process of differentiation. These specialized cell types not only characterize the normal functioning of different organs and tissues, they can also be used as cellular biom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29322913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1977-1 |
_version_ | 1783291890979831808 |
---|---|
author | Bakken, Trygve Cowell, Lindsay Aevermann, Brian D. Novotny, Mark Hodge, Rebecca Miller, Jeremy A. Lee, Alexandra Chang, Ivan McCorrison, Jamison Pulendran, Bali Qian, Yu Schork, Nicholas J. Lasken, Roger S. Lein, Ed S. Scheuermann, Richard H. |
author_facet | Bakken, Trygve Cowell, Lindsay Aevermann, Brian D. Novotny, Mark Hodge, Rebecca Miller, Jeremy A. Lee, Alexandra Chang, Ivan McCorrison, Jamison Pulendran, Bali Qian, Yu Schork, Nicholas J. Lasken, Roger S. Lein, Ed S. Scheuermann, Richard H. |
author_sort | Bakken, Trygve |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A fundamental characteristic of multicellular organisms is the specialization of functional cell types through the process of differentiation. These specialized cell types not only characterize the normal functioning of different organs and tissues, they can also be used as cellular biomarkers of a variety of different disease states and therapeutic/vaccine responses. In order to serve as a reference for cell type representation, the Cell Ontology has been developed to provide a standard nomenclature of defined cell types for comparative analysis and biomarker discovery. Historically, these cell types have been defined based on unique cellular shapes and structures, anatomic locations, and marker protein expression. However, we are now experiencing a revolution in cellular characterization resulting from the application of new high-throughput, high-content cytometry and sequencing technologies. The resulting explosion in the number of distinct cell types being identified is challenging the current paradigm for cell type definition in the Cell Ontology. RESULTS: In this paper, we provide examples of state-of-the-art cellular biomarker characterization using high-content cytometry and single cell RNA sequencing, and present strategies for standardized cell type representations based on the data outputs from these cutting-edge technologies, including “context annotations” in the form of standardized experiment metadata about the specimen source analyzed and marker genes that serve as the most useful features in machine learning-based cell type classification models. We also propose a statistical strategy for comparing new experiment data to these standardized cell type representations. CONCLUSION: The advent of high-throughput/high-content single cell technologies is leading to an explosion in the number of distinct cell types being identified. It will be critical for the bioinformatics community to develop and adopt data standard conventions that will be compatible with these new technologies and support the data representation needs of the research community. The proposals enumerated here will serve as a useful starting point to address these challenges. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5763450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57634502018-01-17 Cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping Bakken, Trygve Cowell, Lindsay Aevermann, Brian D. Novotny, Mark Hodge, Rebecca Miller, Jeremy A. Lee, Alexandra Chang, Ivan McCorrison, Jamison Pulendran, Bali Qian, Yu Schork, Nicholas J. Lasken, Roger S. Lein, Ed S. Scheuermann, Richard H. BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: A fundamental characteristic of multicellular organisms is the specialization of functional cell types through the process of differentiation. These specialized cell types not only characterize the normal functioning of different organs and tissues, they can also be used as cellular biomarkers of a variety of different disease states and therapeutic/vaccine responses. In order to serve as a reference for cell type representation, the Cell Ontology has been developed to provide a standard nomenclature of defined cell types for comparative analysis and biomarker discovery. Historically, these cell types have been defined based on unique cellular shapes and structures, anatomic locations, and marker protein expression. However, we are now experiencing a revolution in cellular characterization resulting from the application of new high-throughput, high-content cytometry and sequencing technologies. The resulting explosion in the number of distinct cell types being identified is challenging the current paradigm for cell type definition in the Cell Ontology. RESULTS: In this paper, we provide examples of state-of-the-art cellular biomarker characterization using high-content cytometry and single cell RNA sequencing, and present strategies for standardized cell type representations based on the data outputs from these cutting-edge technologies, including “context annotations” in the form of standardized experiment metadata about the specimen source analyzed and marker genes that serve as the most useful features in machine learning-based cell type classification models. We also propose a statistical strategy for comparing new experiment data to these standardized cell type representations. CONCLUSION: The advent of high-throughput/high-content single cell technologies is leading to an explosion in the number of distinct cell types being identified. It will be critical for the bioinformatics community to develop and adopt data standard conventions that will be compatible with these new technologies and support the data representation needs of the research community. The proposals enumerated here will serve as a useful starting point to address these challenges. BioMed Central 2017-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5763450/ /pubmed/29322913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1977-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Bakken, Trygve Cowell, Lindsay Aevermann, Brian D. Novotny, Mark Hodge, Rebecca Miller, Jeremy A. Lee, Alexandra Chang, Ivan McCorrison, Jamison Pulendran, Bali Qian, Yu Schork, Nicholas J. Lasken, Roger S. Lein, Ed S. Scheuermann, Richard H. Cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping |
title | Cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping |
title_full | Cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping |
title_fullStr | Cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping |
title_full_unstemmed | Cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping |
title_short | Cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping |
title_sort | cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29322913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1977-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakkentrygve celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT cowelllindsay celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT aevermannbriand celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT novotnymark celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT hodgerebecca celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT millerjeremya celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT leealexandra celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT changivan celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT mccorrisonjamison celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT pulendranbali celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT qianyu celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT schorknicholasj celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT laskenrogers celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT leineds celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping AT scheuermannrichardh celltypediscoveryandrepresentationintheeraofhighcontentsinglecellphenotyping |