Cargando…

The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth

BACKGROUND: There is a gap in knowledge and understanding relating to the experiences of women exposed to the opportunity of waterbirth. Our aim was to explore the perceptions and experiences of women who achieved or did not achieve their planned waterbirth. METHODS: An exploratory design using crit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Lucy, Hauck, Yvonne L., Crichton, Caroline, Barnes, Courtney, Poletti, Corrinne, Overing, Helen, Keyes, Louise, Thomson, Brooke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29320998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1637-5
_version_ 1783291899261485056
author Lewis, Lucy
Hauck, Yvonne L.
Crichton, Caroline
Barnes, Courtney
Poletti, Corrinne
Overing, Helen
Keyes, Louise
Thomson, Brooke
author_facet Lewis, Lucy
Hauck, Yvonne L.
Crichton, Caroline
Barnes, Courtney
Poletti, Corrinne
Overing, Helen
Keyes, Louise
Thomson, Brooke
author_sort Lewis, Lucy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a gap in knowledge and understanding relating to the experiences of women exposed to the opportunity of waterbirth. Our aim was to explore the perceptions and experiences of women who achieved or did not achieve their planned waterbirth. METHODS: An exploratory design using critical incident techniques was conducted between December 2015 and July 2016, in the birth centre of the tertiary public maternity hospital in Western Australia. Women were telephoned 6 weeks post birth. Demographic data included: age; education; parity; and previous birth mode. Women were also asked the following: what made you choose to plan a waterbirth?; what do you think contributed to you having (or not having) a waterbirth?; and which three words would you use to describe your birth experience? Frequency distributions and univariate comparisons were employed for quantitative data. Thematic analysis was undertaken to extract common themes from the interviews. RESULTS: A total of 31% (93 of 296) of women achieved a waterbirth and 69% (203 of 296) did not. Multiparous women were more likely to achieve a waterbirth (57% vs 32%; p < 0.001). Women who achieved a waterbirth were less likely to have planned a waterbirth for pain relief (38% vs 52%; p = 0.24). The primary reasons women gave for planning a waterbirth were: pain relief; they liked the idea; it was associated with a natural birth; it provided a relaxing environment; and it was recommended. Two fifths (40%) of women who achieved a waterbirth suggested support was the primary reason they achieved their waterbirth, with the midwife named as the primary support person by 34 of 37 women. Most (66%) women who did not achieve a waterbirth perceived this was because they experienced an obstetric complication. The words women used to describe their birth were coded as: affirming; distressing; enduring; natural; quick; empowering; and long. CONCLUSIONS: Immersion in water for birth facilitates a shift of focus from high risk obstetric-led care to low risk midwifery-led care. It also facilitates evidence based, respectful midwifery care which in turn optimises the potential for women to view their birthing experience through a positive lens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5763519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57635192018-01-17 The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth Lewis, Lucy Hauck, Yvonne L. Crichton, Caroline Barnes, Courtney Poletti, Corrinne Overing, Helen Keyes, Louise Thomson, Brooke BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a gap in knowledge and understanding relating to the experiences of women exposed to the opportunity of waterbirth. Our aim was to explore the perceptions and experiences of women who achieved or did not achieve their planned waterbirth. METHODS: An exploratory design using critical incident techniques was conducted between December 2015 and July 2016, in the birth centre of the tertiary public maternity hospital in Western Australia. Women were telephoned 6 weeks post birth. Demographic data included: age; education; parity; and previous birth mode. Women were also asked the following: what made you choose to plan a waterbirth?; what do you think contributed to you having (or not having) a waterbirth?; and which three words would you use to describe your birth experience? Frequency distributions and univariate comparisons were employed for quantitative data. Thematic analysis was undertaken to extract common themes from the interviews. RESULTS: A total of 31% (93 of 296) of women achieved a waterbirth and 69% (203 of 296) did not. Multiparous women were more likely to achieve a waterbirth (57% vs 32%; p < 0.001). Women who achieved a waterbirth were less likely to have planned a waterbirth for pain relief (38% vs 52%; p = 0.24). The primary reasons women gave for planning a waterbirth were: pain relief; they liked the idea; it was associated with a natural birth; it provided a relaxing environment; and it was recommended. Two fifths (40%) of women who achieved a waterbirth suggested support was the primary reason they achieved their waterbirth, with the midwife named as the primary support person by 34 of 37 women. Most (66%) women who did not achieve a waterbirth perceived this was because they experienced an obstetric complication. The words women used to describe their birth were coded as: affirming; distressing; enduring; natural; quick; empowering; and long. CONCLUSIONS: Immersion in water for birth facilitates a shift of focus from high risk obstetric-led care to low risk midwifery-led care. It also facilitates evidence based, respectful midwifery care which in turn optimises the potential for women to view their birthing experience through a positive lens. BioMed Central 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5763519/ /pubmed/29320998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1637-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lewis, Lucy
Hauck, Yvonne L.
Crichton, Caroline
Barnes, Courtney
Poletti, Corrinne
Overing, Helen
Keyes, Louise
Thomson, Brooke
The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth
title The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth
title_full The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth
title_fullStr The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth
title_full_unstemmed The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth
title_short The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth
title_sort perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29320998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1637-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lewislucy theperceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT hauckyvonnel theperceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT crichtoncaroline theperceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT barnescourtney theperceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT poletticorrinne theperceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT overinghelen theperceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT keyeslouise theperceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT thomsonbrooke theperceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT lewislucy perceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT hauckyvonnel perceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT crichtoncaroline perceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT barnescourtney perceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT poletticorrinne perceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT overinghelen perceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT keyeslouise perceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth
AT thomsonbrooke perceptionsandexperiencesofwomenwhoachievedanddidnotachieveawaterbirth