Cargando…
Improving attendance to genetic counselling services for gynaecological oncology patients
BACKGROUND: Gynaecological cancers may be the sentinel malignancy in women who carry a mutation in BRCA1 or 2, a mis-match repair gene causing Lynch Syndrome or other genes. Despite published guidelines for referral to a genetics service, a substantial number of women do not attend for the recommend...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40661-018-0059-z |
_version_ | 1783291899507900416 |
---|---|
author | Pokharel, Hanoon P. Hacker, Neville F. Andrews, Lesley |
author_facet | Pokharel, Hanoon P. Hacker, Neville F. Andrews, Lesley |
author_sort | Pokharel, Hanoon P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gynaecological cancers may be the sentinel malignancy in women who carry a mutation in BRCA1 or 2, a mis-match repair gene causing Lynch Syndrome or other genes. Despite published guidelines for referral to a genetics service, a substantial number of women do not attend for the recommended genetic assessment. The study aims to determine the outcomes of systematic follow-up of patients diagnosed with ovarian or endometrial cancer from Gynaecologic-oncology multidisciplinary meetings who were deemed appropriate for genetics assessment. METHODS: Women newly diagnosed with gynaecological cancer at the Royal Hospital for Women between 2010 and 2014 (cohort1) and 2015–2016 (cohort 2) who were identified as suitable for genetics assessment were checked against the New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory genetic database. The doctors of non-attenders were contacted regarding suitability for re-referral, and patients who were still suitable for genetics assessment were contacted by mail. Attendance was again checked against the genetics database. RESULTS: Among 462 patients in cohort 1, flagged for genetic assessment, 167 had not consulted a genetic service at initial audit conducted in 2014. 86 (18.6%) women whose referral was pending clarification of family history and/or immunohistochemistry did not require further genetic assessment. Letters were sent to 40 women. 7 women (1.5%) attended hereditary cancer clinic in the following 6 months. The audit conducted in 2016 identified 148 patients (cohort 2) appropriate for genetic assessment at diagnosis. 66 (44.6%) had been seen by a genetics service, 51 (34.5%) whose referral was pending additional information did not require further genetic assessment. Letters were sent to 15 women, of whom 9 (6.1%) attended genetics within 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the effectiveness of guidelines for the genetic referral of women newly diagnosed with ovarian cancer, clinicians need to obtain a thorough family history at diagnosis; arrange for reflex MMR IHC according to guidelines; offer BRCA or panel testing to all women with non-mucinous ovarian cancer prior to discharge and systematically follow up all women referred to genetics at the post-op visit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5763520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57635202018-01-17 Improving attendance to genetic counselling services for gynaecological oncology patients Pokharel, Hanoon P. Hacker, Neville F. Andrews, Lesley Gynecol Oncol Res Pract Research BACKGROUND: Gynaecological cancers may be the sentinel malignancy in women who carry a mutation in BRCA1 or 2, a mis-match repair gene causing Lynch Syndrome or other genes. Despite published guidelines for referral to a genetics service, a substantial number of women do not attend for the recommended genetic assessment. The study aims to determine the outcomes of systematic follow-up of patients diagnosed with ovarian or endometrial cancer from Gynaecologic-oncology multidisciplinary meetings who were deemed appropriate for genetics assessment. METHODS: Women newly diagnosed with gynaecological cancer at the Royal Hospital for Women between 2010 and 2014 (cohort1) and 2015–2016 (cohort 2) who were identified as suitable for genetics assessment were checked against the New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory genetic database. The doctors of non-attenders were contacted regarding suitability for re-referral, and patients who were still suitable for genetics assessment were contacted by mail. Attendance was again checked against the genetics database. RESULTS: Among 462 patients in cohort 1, flagged for genetic assessment, 167 had not consulted a genetic service at initial audit conducted in 2014. 86 (18.6%) women whose referral was pending clarification of family history and/or immunohistochemistry did not require further genetic assessment. Letters were sent to 40 women. 7 women (1.5%) attended hereditary cancer clinic in the following 6 months. The audit conducted in 2016 identified 148 patients (cohort 2) appropriate for genetic assessment at diagnosis. 66 (44.6%) had been seen by a genetics service, 51 (34.5%) whose referral was pending additional information did not require further genetic assessment. Letters were sent to 15 women, of whom 9 (6.1%) attended genetics within 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the effectiveness of guidelines for the genetic referral of women newly diagnosed with ovarian cancer, clinicians need to obtain a thorough family history at diagnosis; arrange for reflex MMR IHC according to guidelines; offer BRCA or panel testing to all women with non-mucinous ovarian cancer prior to discharge and systematically follow up all women referred to genetics at the post-op visit. BioMed Central 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5763520/ /pubmed/29344385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40661-018-0059-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Pokharel, Hanoon P. Hacker, Neville F. Andrews, Lesley Improving attendance to genetic counselling services for gynaecological oncology patients |
title | Improving attendance to genetic counselling services for gynaecological oncology patients |
title_full | Improving attendance to genetic counselling services for gynaecological oncology patients |
title_fullStr | Improving attendance to genetic counselling services for gynaecological oncology patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving attendance to genetic counselling services for gynaecological oncology patients |
title_short | Improving attendance to genetic counselling services for gynaecological oncology patients |
title_sort | improving attendance to genetic counselling services for gynaecological oncology patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40661-018-0059-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pokharelhanoonp improvingattendancetogeneticcounsellingservicesforgynaecologicaloncologypatients AT hackernevillef improvingattendancetogeneticcounsellingservicesforgynaecologicaloncologypatients AT andrewslesley improvingattendancetogeneticcounsellingservicesforgynaecologicaloncologypatients |