Cargando…
Deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients with predicted low cardiovascular disease risk in general practice – the ECSTATIC study: a cluster randomised non-inferiority trial
BACKGROUND: The use of cardiovascular medication for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is potentially inappropriate when potential risks outweigh the potential benefits. It is unknown whether deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients without a strict indicat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0988-0 |
_version_ | 1783291907260022784 |
---|---|
author | Luymes, Clare H. Poortvliet, Rosalinde K. E. van Geloven, Nan de Waal, Margot W. M. Drewes, Yvonne M. Blom, Jeanet W. Smidt, Nynke Assendelft, Willem J. J. van den Hout, Wilbert B. de Ruijter, Wouter Numans, Mattijs E. |
author_facet | Luymes, Clare H. Poortvliet, Rosalinde K. E. van Geloven, Nan de Waal, Margot W. M. Drewes, Yvonne M. Blom, Jeanet W. Smidt, Nynke Assendelft, Willem J. J. van den Hout, Wilbert B. de Ruijter, Wouter Numans, Mattijs E. |
author_sort | Luymes, Clare H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of cardiovascular medication for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is potentially inappropriate when potential risks outweigh the potential benefits. It is unknown whether deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients without a strict indication for such medication is safe and cost-effective in general practice. METHODS: In this pragmatic cluster randomised controlled non-inferiority trial, we recruited 46 general practices in the Netherlands. Patients aged 40–70 years who were using antihypertensive and/or lipid-lowering drugs without CVD and with low risk of future CVD were followed for 2 years. The intervention was an attempt to deprescribe preventive cardiovascular medication. The primary outcome was the difference in the increase in predicted (10-year) CVD risk in the per-protocol (PP) population with a non-inferiority margin of 2.5 percentage points. An economic evaluation was performed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. We used multilevel (generalised) linear regression with multiple imputation of missing data. RESULTS: Of 1067 participants recruited between 7 November 2012 and 18 February 2014, 72% were female. Overall, their mean age was 55 years and their mean predicted CVD risk at baseline was 5%. Of 492 participants in the ITT intervention group, 319 (65%) quit the medication (PP intervention group); 135 (27%) of those participants were still not taking medication after 2 years. The predicted CVD risk increased by 2.0 percentage points in the PP intervention group compared to 1.9 percentage points in the usual care group. The difference of 0.1 (95% CI -0.3 to 0.6) fell within the non-inferiority margin. After 2 years, compared to the usual care group, for the PP intervention group, systolic blood pressure was 6 mmHg higher, diastolic blood pressure was 4 mmHg higher and total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were both 7 mg/dl higher (all P < 0.05). Cost and quality-adjusted life years did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the ECSTATIC study show that an attempt to deprescribe preventive cardiovascular medication in low-CVD-risk patients is safe in the short term when blood pressure and cholesterol levels are monitored after stopping. An attempt to deprescribe medication can be considered, taking patient preferences into consideration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with Dutch trial register on 20 June 2012 (NTR3493). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0988-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5763574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57635742018-01-17 Deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients with predicted low cardiovascular disease risk in general practice – the ECSTATIC study: a cluster randomised non-inferiority trial Luymes, Clare H. Poortvliet, Rosalinde K. E. van Geloven, Nan de Waal, Margot W. M. Drewes, Yvonne M. Blom, Jeanet W. Smidt, Nynke Assendelft, Willem J. J. van den Hout, Wilbert B. de Ruijter, Wouter Numans, Mattijs E. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of cardiovascular medication for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is potentially inappropriate when potential risks outweigh the potential benefits. It is unknown whether deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients without a strict indication for such medication is safe and cost-effective in general practice. METHODS: In this pragmatic cluster randomised controlled non-inferiority trial, we recruited 46 general practices in the Netherlands. Patients aged 40–70 years who were using antihypertensive and/or lipid-lowering drugs without CVD and with low risk of future CVD were followed for 2 years. The intervention was an attempt to deprescribe preventive cardiovascular medication. The primary outcome was the difference in the increase in predicted (10-year) CVD risk in the per-protocol (PP) population with a non-inferiority margin of 2.5 percentage points. An economic evaluation was performed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. We used multilevel (generalised) linear regression with multiple imputation of missing data. RESULTS: Of 1067 participants recruited between 7 November 2012 and 18 February 2014, 72% were female. Overall, their mean age was 55 years and their mean predicted CVD risk at baseline was 5%. Of 492 participants in the ITT intervention group, 319 (65%) quit the medication (PP intervention group); 135 (27%) of those participants were still not taking medication after 2 years. The predicted CVD risk increased by 2.0 percentage points in the PP intervention group compared to 1.9 percentage points in the usual care group. The difference of 0.1 (95% CI -0.3 to 0.6) fell within the non-inferiority margin. After 2 years, compared to the usual care group, for the PP intervention group, systolic blood pressure was 6 mmHg higher, diastolic blood pressure was 4 mmHg higher and total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were both 7 mg/dl higher (all P < 0.05). Cost and quality-adjusted life years did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the ECSTATIC study show that an attempt to deprescribe preventive cardiovascular medication in low-CVD-risk patients is safe in the short term when blood pressure and cholesterol levels are monitored after stopping. An attempt to deprescribe medication can be considered, taking patient preferences into consideration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with Dutch trial register on 20 June 2012 (NTR3493). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0988-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5763574/ /pubmed/29321031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0988-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Luymes, Clare H. Poortvliet, Rosalinde K. E. van Geloven, Nan de Waal, Margot W. M. Drewes, Yvonne M. Blom, Jeanet W. Smidt, Nynke Assendelft, Willem J. J. van den Hout, Wilbert B. de Ruijter, Wouter Numans, Mattijs E. Deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients with predicted low cardiovascular disease risk in general practice – the ECSTATIC study: a cluster randomised non-inferiority trial |
title | Deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients with predicted low cardiovascular disease risk in general practice – the ECSTATIC study: a cluster randomised non-inferiority trial |
title_full | Deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients with predicted low cardiovascular disease risk in general practice – the ECSTATIC study: a cluster randomised non-inferiority trial |
title_fullStr | Deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients with predicted low cardiovascular disease risk in general practice – the ECSTATIC study: a cluster randomised non-inferiority trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients with predicted low cardiovascular disease risk in general practice – the ECSTATIC study: a cluster randomised non-inferiority trial |
title_short | Deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients with predicted low cardiovascular disease risk in general practice – the ECSTATIC study: a cluster randomised non-inferiority trial |
title_sort | deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients with predicted low cardiovascular disease risk in general practice – the ecstatic study: a cluster randomised non-inferiority trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0988-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luymesclareh deprescribingpreventivecardiovascularmedicationinpatientswithpredictedlowcardiovasculardiseaseriskingeneralpracticetheecstaticstudyaclusterrandomisednoninferioritytrial AT poortvlietrosalindeke deprescribingpreventivecardiovascularmedicationinpatientswithpredictedlowcardiovasculardiseaseriskingeneralpracticetheecstaticstudyaclusterrandomisednoninferioritytrial AT vangelovennan deprescribingpreventivecardiovascularmedicationinpatientswithpredictedlowcardiovasculardiseaseriskingeneralpracticetheecstaticstudyaclusterrandomisednoninferioritytrial AT dewaalmargotwm deprescribingpreventivecardiovascularmedicationinpatientswithpredictedlowcardiovasculardiseaseriskingeneralpracticetheecstaticstudyaclusterrandomisednoninferioritytrial AT drewesyvonnem deprescribingpreventivecardiovascularmedicationinpatientswithpredictedlowcardiovasculardiseaseriskingeneralpracticetheecstaticstudyaclusterrandomisednoninferioritytrial AT blomjeanetw deprescribingpreventivecardiovascularmedicationinpatientswithpredictedlowcardiovasculardiseaseriskingeneralpracticetheecstaticstudyaclusterrandomisednoninferioritytrial AT smidtnynke deprescribingpreventivecardiovascularmedicationinpatientswithpredictedlowcardiovasculardiseaseriskingeneralpracticetheecstaticstudyaclusterrandomisednoninferioritytrial AT assendelftwillemjj deprescribingpreventivecardiovascularmedicationinpatientswithpredictedlowcardiovasculardiseaseriskingeneralpracticetheecstaticstudyaclusterrandomisednoninferioritytrial AT vandenhoutwilbertb deprescribingpreventivecardiovascularmedicationinpatientswithpredictedlowcardiovasculardiseaseriskingeneralpracticetheecstaticstudyaclusterrandomisednoninferioritytrial AT deruijterwouter deprescribingpreventivecardiovascularmedicationinpatientswithpredictedlowcardiovasculardiseaseriskingeneralpracticetheecstaticstudyaclusterrandomisednoninferioritytrial AT numansmattijse deprescribingpreventivecardiovascularmedicationinpatientswithpredictedlowcardiovasculardiseaseriskingeneralpracticetheecstaticstudyaclusterrandomisednoninferioritytrial |