Cargando…
Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors
BACKGROUND: The overarching purpose of this study is to examine the current trends in interprofessional education (IPE) within graduate medical education in the Unites States. METHODS: A survey was sent to program directors across with different specialties between March and April 2016. The survey w...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1104-z |
_version_ | 1783291908675600384 |
---|---|
author | Al Achkar, Morhaf Hanauer, Mathew Colavecchia, Chantel Seehusen, Dean A. |
author_facet | Al Achkar, Morhaf Hanauer, Mathew Colavecchia, Chantel Seehusen, Dean A. |
author_sort | Al Achkar, Morhaf |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The overarching purpose of this study is to examine the current trends in interprofessional education (IPE) within graduate medical education in the Unites States. METHODS: A survey was sent to program directors across with different specialties between March and April 2016. The survey was completed by 233 out of 1757 program directors, which represents a response rate of 13.3%. RESULTS: IPE is currently being used by over 60% of the GME program directors that completed the survey. The median number of IPE hours is 60. Classroom learning (70.8%) and team-based approaches (70.1%) to patient care are the two most common forms of IPE. The two most prevalent reasons for implementing IPE are improving collaboration (92.2%) and communication (87%). More than half of the program directors agreed or strongly agreed that lack of time both for teachers (54.4) and for residents (51.5%) are barriers to IPE. About one third of the respondents whose programs do not include IPE are interested in implementing some IPE in the future. CONCLUSION: IPE in its varying formats has been implemented as a training model by many residency programs. Further studies are needed to explore the comparative effectiveness of the different modalities of IPE. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1104-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5763580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57635802018-01-17 Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors Al Achkar, Morhaf Hanauer, Mathew Colavecchia, Chantel Seehusen, Dean A. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The overarching purpose of this study is to examine the current trends in interprofessional education (IPE) within graduate medical education in the Unites States. METHODS: A survey was sent to program directors across with different specialties between March and April 2016. The survey was completed by 233 out of 1757 program directors, which represents a response rate of 13.3%. RESULTS: IPE is currently being used by over 60% of the GME program directors that completed the survey. The median number of IPE hours is 60. Classroom learning (70.8%) and team-based approaches (70.1%) to patient care are the two most common forms of IPE. The two most prevalent reasons for implementing IPE are improving collaboration (92.2%) and communication (87%). More than half of the program directors agreed or strongly agreed that lack of time both for teachers (54.4) and for residents (51.5%) are barriers to IPE. About one third of the respondents whose programs do not include IPE are interested in implementing some IPE in the future. CONCLUSION: IPE in its varying formats has been implemented as a training model by many residency programs. Further studies are needed to explore the comparative effectiveness of the different modalities of IPE. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1104-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5763580/ /pubmed/29321024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1104-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Al Achkar, Morhaf Hanauer, Mathew Colavecchia, Chantel Seehusen, Dean A. Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors |
title | Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors |
title_full | Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors |
title_fullStr | Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors |
title_full_unstemmed | Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors |
title_short | Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors |
title_sort | interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1104-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alachkarmorhaf interprofessionaleducationingraduatemedicaleducationsurveystudyofresidencyprogramdirectors AT hanauermathew interprofessionaleducationingraduatemedicaleducationsurveystudyofresidencyprogramdirectors AT colavecchiachantel interprofessionaleducationingraduatemedicaleducationsurveystudyofresidencyprogramdirectors AT seehusendeana interprofessionaleducationingraduatemedicaleducationsurveystudyofresidencyprogramdirectors |