Cargando…

Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors

BACKGROUND: The overarching purpose of this study is to examine the current trends in interprofessional education (IPE) within graduate medical education in the Unites States. METHODS: A survey was sent to program directors across with different specialties between March and April 2016. The survey w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Achkar, Morhaf, Hanauer, Mathew, Colavecchia, Chantel, Seehusen, Dean A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1104-z
_version_ 1783291908675600384
author Al Achkar, Morhaf
Hanauer, Mathew
Colavecchia, Chantel
Seehusen, Dean A.
author_facet Al Achkar, Morhaf
Hanauer, Mathew
Colavecchia, Chantel
Seehusen, Dean A.
author_sort Al Achkar, Morhaf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The overarching purpose of this study is to examine the current trends in interprofessional education (IPE) within graduate medical education in the Unites States. METHODS: A survey was sent to program directors across with different specialties between March and April 2016. The survey was completed by 233 out of 1757 program directors, which represents a response rate of 13.3%. RESULTS: IPE is currently being used by over 60% of the GME program directors that completed the survey. The median number of IPE hours is 60. Classroom learning (70.8%) and team-based approaches (70.1%) to patient care are the two most common forms of IPE. The two most prevalent reasons for implementing IPE are improving collaboration (92.2%) and communication (87%). More than half of the program directors agreed or strongly agreed that lack of time both for teachers (54.4) and for residents (51.5%) are barriers to IPE. About one third of the respondents whose programs do not include IPE are interested in implementing some IPE in the future. CONCLUSION: IPE in its varying formats has been implemented as a training model by many residency programs. Further studies are needed to explore the comparative effectiveness of the different modalities of IPE. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1104-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5763580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57635802018-01-17 Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors Al Achkar, Morhaf Hanauer, Mathew Colavecchia, Chantel Seehusen, Dean A. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The overarching purpose of this study is to examine the current trends in interprofessional education (IPE) within graduate medical education in the Unites States. METHODS: A survey was sent to program directors across with different specialties between March and April 2016. The survey was completed by 233 out of 1757 program directors, which represents a response rate of 13.3%. RESULTS: IPE is currently being used by over 60% of the GME program directors that completed the survey. The median number of IPE hours is 60. Classroom learning (70.8%) and team-based approaches (70.1%) to patient care are the two most common forms of IPE. The two most prevalent reasons for implementing IPE are improving collaboration (92.2%) and communication (87%). More than half of the program directors agreed or strongly agreed that lack of time both for teachers (54.4) and for residents (51.5%) are barriers to IPE. About one third of the respondents whose programs do not include IPE are interested in implementing some IPE in the future. CONCLUSION: IPE in its varying formats has been implemented as a training model by many residency programs. Further studies are needed to explore the comparative effectiveness of the different modalities of IPE. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1104-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5763580/ /pubmed/29321024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1104-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Al Achkar, Morhaf
Hanauer, Mathew
Colavecchia, Chantel
Seehusen, Dean A.
Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors
title Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors
title_full Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors
title_fullStr Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors
title_full_unstemmed Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors
title_short Interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors
title_sort interprofessional education in graduate medical education: survey study of residency program directors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1104-z
work_keys_str_mv AT alachkarmorhaf interprofessionaleducationingraduatemedicaleducationsurveystudyofresidencyprogramdirectors
AT hanauermathew interprofessionaleducationingraduatemedicaleducationsurveystudyofresidencyprogramdirectors
AT colavecchiachantel interprofessionaleducationingraduatemedicaleducationsurveystudyofresidencyprogramdirectors
AT seehusendeana interprofessionaleducationingraduatemedicaleducationsurveystudyofresidencyprogramdirectors