Cargando…
The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility
BACKGROUND: To assess the factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility of the Quality of Working Life Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (QWLQ-CS). METHODS: An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on QWLQ-CS data from a sample of employed cancer surviv...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3966-1 |
_version_ | 1783291922505269248 |
---|---|
author | de Jong, Merel Tamminga, Sietske J. van Es, Robert J. J. Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W. de Boer, Angela G. E. M. |
author_facet | de Jong, Merel Tamminga, Sietske J. van Es, Robert J. J. Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W. de Boer, Angela G. E. M. |
author_sort | de Jong, Merel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To assess the factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility of the Quality of Working Life Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (QWLQ-CS). METHODS: An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on QWLQ-CS data from a sample of employed cancer survivors to establish the final number of items and factorial structure of the QWLQ-CS. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. In a second sample of (self-)employed cancer survivors, construct validity was tested by convergent validity (correlations of QWLQ-CS with construct-related questionnaires), and discriminative validity (difference in QWLQ-CS scores between cancer survivors and employed people without cancer). In a subgroup of stable cancer survivors subtracted from the second sample, reproducibility was evaluated by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Standard Error of Measurement (SEM). RESULTS: EFA on QWLQ-CS data of 302 cancer survivors resulted in 23 items and five factors. The internal consistency of the QWLQ-CS was Cronbach’s α = 0.91. Convergent validity on data of 130 cancer survivors resulted in r = 0.61–0.70. QWLQ-CS scores of these cancer survivors statistically differed (p = 0.04) from employed people without cancer (N = 45). Reproducibility of QWLQ-CS data from 87 cancer survivors demonstrated an ICC of 0.84 and a SEM of 9.59. CONCLUSIONS: The five-factor QWLQ-CS with 23 items and adequate internal consistency, construct validity, and reproducibility at group level can be used in clinical and occupational healthcare, and research settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3966-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5763640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57636402018-01-17 The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility de Jong, Merel Tamminga, Sietske J. van Es, Robert J. J. Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W. de Boer, Angela G. E. M. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: To assess the factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility of the Quality of Working Life Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (QWLQ-CS). METHODS: An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on QWLQ-CS data from a sample of employed cancer survivors to establish the final number of items and factorial structure of the QWLQ-CS. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. In a second sample of (self-)employed cancer survivors, construct validity was tested by convergent validity (correlations of QWLQ-CS with construct-related questionnaires), and discriminative validity (difference in QWLQ-CS scores between cancer survivors and employed people without cancer). In a subgroup of stable cancer survivors subtracted from the second sample, reproducibility was evaluated by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Standard Error of Measurement (SEM). RESULTS: EFA on QWLQ-CS data of 302 cancer survivors resulted in 23 items and five factors. The internal consistency of the QWLQ-CS was Cronbach’s α = 0.91. Convergent validity on data of 130 cancer survivors resulted in r = 0.61–0.70. QWLQ-CS scores of these cancer survivors statistically differed (p = 0.04) from employed people without cancer (N = 45). Reproducibility of QWLQ-CS data from 87 cancer survivors demonstrated an ICC of 0.84 and a SEM of 9.59. CONCLUSIONS: The five-factor QWLQ-CS with 23 items and adequate internal consistency, construct validity, and reproducibility at group level can be used in clinical and occupational healthcare, and research settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3966-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5763640/ /pubmed/29321006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3966-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Jong, Merel Tamminga, Sietske J. van Es, Robert J. J. Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W. de Boer, Angela G. E. M. The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility |
title | The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility |
title_full | The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility |
title_fullStr | The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility |
title_full_unstemmed | The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility |
title_short | The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility |
title_sort | quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (qwlq-cs): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3966-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dejongmerel thequalityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility AT tammingasietskej thequalityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility AT vanesrobertjj thequalityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility AT fringsdresenmoniquehw thequalityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility AT deboerangelagem thequalityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility AT dejongmerel qualityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility AT tammingasietskej qualityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility AT vanesrobertjj qualityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility AT fringsdresenmoniquehw qualityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility AT deboerangelagem qualityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility |