Cargando…

The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility

BACKGROUND: To assess the factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility of the Quality of Working Life Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (QWLQ-CS). METHODS: An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on QWLQ-CS data from a sample of employed cancer surviv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Jong, Merel, Tamminga, Sietske J., van Es, Robert J. J., Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W., de Boer, Angela G. E. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3966-1
_version_ 1783291922505269248
author de Jong, Merel
Tamminga, Sietske J.
van Es, Robert J. J.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
de Boer, Angela G. E. M.
author_facet de Jong, Merel
Tamminga, Sietske J.
van Es, Robert J. J.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
de Boer, Angela G. E. M.
author_sort de Jong, Merel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility of the Quality of Working Life Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (QWLQ-CS). METHODS: An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on QWLQ-CS data from a sample of employed cancer survivors to establish the final number of items and factorial structure of the QWLQ-CS. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. In a second sample of (self-)employed cancer survivors, construct validity was tested by convergent validity (correlations of QWLQ-CS with construct-related questionnaires), and discriminative validity (difference in QWLQ-CS scores between cancer survivors and employed people without cancer). In a subgroup of stable cancer survivors subtracted from the second sample, reproducibility was evaluated by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Standard Error of Measurement (SEM). RESULTS: EFA on QWLQ-CS data of 302 cancer survivors resulted in 23 items and five factors. The internal consistency of the QWLQ-CS was Cronbach’s α = 0.91. Convergent validity on data of 130 cancer survivors resulted in r = 0.61–0.70. QWLQ-CS scores of these cancer survivors statistically differed (p = 0.04) from employed people without cancer (N = 45). Reproducibility of QWLQ-CS data from 87 cancer survivors demonstrated an ICC of 0.84 and a SEM of 9.59. CONCLUSIONS: The five-factor QWLQ-CS with 23 items and adequate internal consistency, construct validity, and reproducibility at group level can be used in clinical and occupational healthcare, and research settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3966-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5763640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57636402018-01-17 The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility de Jong, Merel Tamminga, Sietske J. van Es, Robert J. J. Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W. de Boer, Angela G. E. M. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: To assess the factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility of the Quality of Working Life Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (QWLQ-CS). METHODS: An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on QWLQ-CS data from a sample of employed cancer survivors to establish the final number of items and factorial structure of the QWLQ-CS. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. In a second sample of (self-)employed cancer survivors, construct validity was tested by convergent validity (correlations of QWLQ-CS with construct-related questionnaires), and discriminative validity (difference in QWLQ-CS scores between cancer survivors and employed people without cancer). In a subgroup of stable cancer survivors subtracted from the second sample, reproducibility was evaluated by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Standard Error of Measurement (SEM). RESULTS: EFA on QWLQ-CS data of 302 cancer survivors resulted in 23 items and five factors. The internal consistency of the QWLQ-CS was Cronbach’s α = 0.91. Convergent validity on data of 130 cancer survivors resulted in r = 0.61–0.70. QWLQ-CS scores of these cancer survivors statistically differed (p = 0.04) from employed people without cancer (N = 45). Reproducibility of QWLQ-CS data from 87 cancer survivors demonstrated an ICC of 0.84 and a SEM of 9.59. CONCLUSIONS: The five-factor QWLQ-CS with 23 items and adequate internal consistency, construct validity, and reproducibility at group level can be used in clinical and occupational healthcare, and research settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3966-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5763640/ /pubmed/29321006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3966-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Jong, Merel
Tamminga, Sietske J.
van Es, Robert J. J.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
de Boer, Angela G. E. M.
The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility
title The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility
title_full The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility
title_fullStr The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility
title_full_unstemmed The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility
title_short The quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (QWLQ-CS): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility
title_sort quality of working life questionnaire for cancer survivors (qwlq-cs): factorial structure, internal consistency, construct validity and reproducibility
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3966-1
work_keys_str_mv AT dejongmerel thequalityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility
AT tammingasietskej thequalityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility
AT vanesrobertjj thequalityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility
AT fringsdresenmoniquehw thequalityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility
AT deboerangelagem thequalityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility
AT dejongmerel qualityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility
AT tammingasietskej qualityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility
AT vanesrobertjj qualityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility
AT fringsdresenmoniquehw qualityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility
AT deboerangelagem qualityofworkinglifequestionnaireforcancersurvivorsqwlqcsfactorialstructureinternalconsistencyconstructvalidityandreproducibility