Cargando…

Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction – implications for clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a poorly characterized condition. We aimed to phenotype patients with HFpEF using multiparametric stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and to assess the relationship to clinical outcomes. METHODS: One hundred and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanagala, Prathap, Cheng, Adrian S. H., Singh, Anvesha, McAdam, John, Marsh, Anna-Marie, Arnold, Jayanth R., Squire, Iain B., Ng, Leong L., McCann, Gerry P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0424-9
_version_ 1783291947874516992
author Kanagala, Prathap
Cheng, Adrian S. H.
Singh, Anvesha
McAdam, John
Marsh, Anna-Marie
Arnold, Jayanth R.
Squire, Iain B.
Ng, Leong L.
McCann, Gerry P.
author_facet Kanagala, Prathap
Cheng, Adrian S. H.
Singh, Anvesha
McAdam, John
Marsh, Anna-Marie
Arnold, Jayanth R.
Squire, Iain B.
Ng, Leong L.
McCann, Gerry P.
author_sort Kanagala, Prathap
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a poorly characterized condition. We aimed to phenotype patients with HFpEF using multiparametric stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and to assess the relationship to clinical outcomes. METHODS: One hundred and fifty four patients (51% male, mean age 72 ± 10 years) with a diagnosis of HFpEF underwent transthoracic echocardiography and CMR during a single study visit. The CMR protocol comprised cine, stress/rest perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging on a 3T scanner. Follow-up outcome data (death and heart failure hospitalization) were captured after a minimum of 6 months. RESULTS: CMR detected previously undiagnosed pathology in 42 patients (27%), who had similar baseline characteristics to those without a new diagnosis. These diagnoses consisted of: coronary artery disease (n = 20, including 14 with ‘silent’ infarction), microvascular dysfunction (n = 11), probable or definite hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 10) and constrictive pericarditis (n = 5). Four patients had dual pathology. During follow-up (median 623 days), patients with a new CMR diagnosis were at higher risk of adverse outcome for the composite endpoint (log rank test: p = 0.047). In multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, a new CMR diagnosis was the strongest independent predictor of adverse outcome (hazard ratio: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.07 to 3.45; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: CMR diagnosed new significant pathology in 27% of patients with HFpEF. These patients were at increased risk of death and heart failure hospitalization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03050593. Retrospectively registered; Date of registration: February 06, 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5763769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57637692018-01-17 Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction – implications for clinical trials Kanagala, Prathap Cheng, Adrian S. H. Singh, Anvesha McAdam, John Marsh, Anna-Marie Arnold, Jayanth R. Squire, Iain B. Ng, Leong L. McCann, Gerry P. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a poorly characterized condition. We aimed to phenotype patients with HFpEF using multiparametric stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and to assess the relationship to clinical outcomes. METHODS: One hundred and fifty four patients (51% male, mean age 72 ± 10 years) with a diagnosis of HFpEF underwent transthoracic echocardiography and CMR during a single study visit. The CMR protocol comprised cine, stress/rest perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging on a 3T scanner. Follow-up outcome data (death and heart failure hospitalization) were captured after a minimum of 6 months. RESULTS: CMR detected previously undiagnosed pathology in 42 patients (27%), who had similar baseline characteristics to those without a new diagnosis. These diagnoses consisted of: coronary artery disease (n = 20, including 14 with ‘silent’ infarction), microvascular dysfunction (n = 11), probable or definite hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 10) and constrictive pericarditis (n = 5). Four patients had dual pathology. During follow-up (median 623 days), patients with a new CMR diagnosis were at higher risk of adverse outcome for the composite endpoint (log rank test: p = 0.047). In multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, a new CMR diagnosis was the strongest independent predictor of adverse outcome (hazard ratio: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.07 to 3.45; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: CMR diagnosed new significant pathology in 27% of patients with HFpEF. These patients were at increased risk of death and heart failure hospitalization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03050593. Retrospectively registered; Date of registration: February 06, 2017. BioMed Central 2018-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5763769/ /pubmed/29321034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0424-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kanagala, Prathap
Cheng, Adrian S. H.
Singh, Anvesha
McAdam, John
Marsh, Anna-Marie
Arnold, Jayanth R.
Squire, Iain B.
Ng, Leong L.
McCann, Gerry P.
Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction – implications for clinical trials
title Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction – implications for clinical trials
title_full Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction – implications for clinical trials
title_fullStr Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction – implications for clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction – implications for clinical trials
title_short Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction – implications for clinical trials
title_sort diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction – implications for clinical trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5763769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0424-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kanagalaprathap diagnosticandprognosticutilityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT chengadriansh diagnosticandprognosticutilityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT singhanvesha diagnosticandprognosticutilityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT mcadamjohn diagnosticandprognosticutilityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT marshannamarie diagnosticandprognosticutilityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT arnoldjayanthr diagnosticandprognosticutilityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT squireiainb diagnosticandprognosticutilityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT ngleongl diagnosticandprognosticutilityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT mccanngerryp diagnosticandprognosticutilityofcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimaginginheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionimplicationsforclinicaltrials