Cargando…

Validity, reliability and Norwegian adaptation of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of stroke-specific instruments to assess health-related quality of life in the Norwegian language. The objective was to examine the validity and reliability of a Norwegian version of the 12-domain Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale. METHODS: A total of 125 stroke su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedersen, Synne Garder, Heiberg, Guri Anita, Nielsen, Jørgen Feldbæk, Friborg, Oddgeir, Stabel, Henriette Holm, Anke, Audny, Arntzen, Cathrine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5764138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312117752031
_version_ 1783292010086531072
author Pedersen, Synne Garder
Heiberg, Guri Anita
Nielsen, Jørgen Feldbæk
Friborg, Oddgeir
Stabel, Henriette Holm
Anke, Audny
Arntzen, Cathrine
author_facet Pedersen, Synne Garder
Heiberg, Guri Anita
Nielsen, Jørgen Feldbæk
Friborg, Oddgeir
Stabel, Henriette Holm
Anke, Audny
Arntzen, Cathrine
author_sort Pedersen, Synne Garder
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of stroke-specific instruments to assess health-related quality of life in the Norwegian language. The objective was to examine the validity and reliability of a Norwegian version of the 12-domain Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale. METHODS: A total of 125 stroke survivors were prospectively recruited. Questionnaires were administered at 3 months; 36 test–retests were performed at 12 months post stroke. The translation was conducted according to guidelines. The internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha; convergent validity, with item-to-subscale correlations; and test–retest, with Spearman’s correlations. Scaling validity was explored by calculating both floor and ceiling effects. A priori hypotheses regarding the associations between the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life domain scores and scores of established measures were tested. Standard error of measurement was assessed. RESULTS: The Norwegian version revealed no major changes in back translations. The internal consistency values of the domains were Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79–0.93. Rates of missing items were small, and the item-to-subscale correlation coefficients supported convergent validity (0.48–0.87). The observed floor effects were generally small, whereas the ceiling effects had moderate or high values (16%–63%). Test–retest reliability indicated stability in most domains, with Spearman’s rho = 0.67–0.94 (all p < 0.001), whereas the rho was 0.35 (p < 0.05) for the ‘Vision’ domain. Hypothesis testing supported the construct validity of the scale. Standard error of measurement values for each domain were generated to indicate the required magnitudes of detectable change. CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian version of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale is a reliable and valid instrument with good psychometric properties. It is suited for use in health research as well as in individual assessments of persons with stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5764138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57641382018-01-17 Validity, reliability and Norwegian adaptation of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale Pedersen, Synne Garder Heiberg, Guri Anita Nielsen, Jørgen Feldbæk Friborg, Oddgeir Stabel, Henriette Holm Anke, Audny Arntzen, Cathrine SAGE Open Med Original Article BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of stroke-specific instruments to assess health-related quality of life in the Norwegian language. The objective was to examine the validity and reliability of a Norwegian version of the 12-domain Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale. METHODS: A total of 125 stroke survivors were prospectively recruited. Questionnaires were administered at 3 months; 36 test–retests were performed at 12 months post stroke. The translation was conducted according to guidelines. The internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha; convergent validity, with item-to-subscale correlations; and test–retest, with Spearman’s correlations. Scaling validity was explored by calculating both floor and ceiling effects. A priori hypotheses regarding the associations between the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life domain scores and scores of established measures were tested. Standard error of measurement was assessed. RESULTS: The Norwegian version revealed no major changes in back translations. The internal consistency values of the domains were Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79–0.93. Rates of missing items were small, and the item-to-subscale correlation coefficients supported convergent validity (0.48–0.87). The observed floor effects were generally small, whereas the ceiling effects had moderate or high values (16%–63%). Test–retest reliability indicated stability in most domains, with Spearman’s rho = 0.67–0.94 (all p < 0.001), whereas the rho was 0.35 (p < 0.05) for the ‘Vision’ domain. Hypothesis testing supported the construct validity of the scale. Standard error of measurement values for each domain were generated to indicate the required magnitudes of detectable change. CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian version of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale is a reliable and valid instrument with good psychometric properties. It is suited for use in health research as well as in individual assessments of persons with stroke. SAGE Publications 2018-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5764138/ /pubmed/29344360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312117752031 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Pedersen, Synne Garder
Heiberg, Guri Anita
Nielsen, Jørgen Feldbæk
Friborg, Oddgeir
Stabel, Henriette Holm
Anke, Audny
Arntzen, Cathrine
Validity, reliability and Norwegian adaptation of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale
title Validity, reliability and Norwegian adaptation of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale
title_full Validity, reliability and Norwegian adaptation of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale
title_fullStr Validity, reliability and Norwegian adaptation of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale
title_full_unstemmed Validity, reliability and Norwegian adaptation of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale
title_short Validity, reliability and Norwegian adaptation of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale
title_sort validity, reliability and norwegian adaptation of the stroke-specific quality of life (ss-qol) scale
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5764138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312117752031
work_keys_str_mv AT pedersensynnegarder validityreliabilityandnorwegianadaptationofthestrokespecificqualityoflifessqolscale
AT heiberggurianita validityreliabilityandnorwegianadaptationofthestrokespecificqualityoflifessqolscale
AT nielsenjørgenfeldbæk validityreliabilityandnorwegianadaptationofthestrokespecificqualityoflifessqolscale
AT friborgoddgeir validityreliabilityandnorwegianadaptationofthestrokespecificqualityoflifessqolscale
AT stabelhenrietteholm validityreliabilityandnorwegianadaptationofthestrokespecificqualityoflifessqolscale
AT ankeaudny validityreliabilityandnorwegianadaptationofthestrokespecificqualityoflifessqolscale
AT arntzencathrine validityreliabilityandnorwegianadaptationofthestrokespecificqualityoflifessqolscale