Cargando…

Bedside ultrasound is a practical measurement tool for assessing muscle mass

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intra- and inter-reliability and the ease of measuring the quadriceps muscle thickness using bedside ultrasound. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational study. The assessment of quadriceps muscle thickness was performed at two reference points and was quantified usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toledo, Diogo Oliveira, Silva, Débora Carneiro de Lima e, dos Santos, Dyaiane Marques, de Freitas, Branca Jardini, Dib, Rogério, Cordioli, Ricardo Luiz, Figueiredo, Evandro José de Almeida, Piovacari, Silvia Maria Fraga, Silva Jr., João Manoel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5764560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29340537
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20170071
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intra- and inter-reliability and the ease of measuring the quadriceps muscle thickness using bedside ultrasound. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational study. The assessment of quadriceps muscle thickness was performed at two reference points and was quantified using portable B-mode ultrasound in two healthy volunteers. For standardization of measurements and validation of image collections, the team was trained through theoretical and practical classes, with a 6-hour workload. RESULTS: A total of 112 images were examined by the coach and compared with the trainees. Pearson's correlation analysis found an excellent relationship between the coach and all trainees (R(2) > 0.90). The best association was between the coach and the dietitians (R(2): 0.99; p < 0.001), and the worst association was between the coach and the medical trainees (R(2): 0.92; p < 0.001). In the Bland-Altman comparison, the highest error rate found between coach and trainees was 5.12% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.64-12.37), and the lowest was 1.01% (95%CI 0.72 - 2.58); the highest bias of the values described was -0.12 ± 0.19, and the lowest was -0.01 ± 0.04. CONCLUSION: The data analyzed showed a good correlation between the measurements made by the coach and trainees, indicating that ultrasound of the quadriceps muscle is a viable and easily applicable tool.