Cargando…

Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Coronary Intervention: Unmet Needs and Evolution

Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) represent a novel paradigm in the 40-year history of interventional cardiology. Restoration of cyclic pulsatility and physiologic vasomotion, adaptive vascular remodeling, plaque regression, and removal of the trigger for late adverse events are expected BRS benefits ov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Capodanno, Davide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Cardiology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5764868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29322695
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2017.0194
_version_ 1783292109785137152
author Capodanno, Davide
author_facet Capodanno, Davide
author_sort Capodanno, Davide
collection PubMed
description Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) represent a novel paradigm in the 40-year history of interventional cardiology. Restoration of cyclic pulsatility and physiologic vasomotion, adaptive vascular remodeling, plaque regression, and removal of the trigger for late adverse events are expected BRS benefits over current metallic drug-eluting stents. However, first-generation BRS devices have significant manufacturing limitations and rely on optimal implantation technique to avoid experiencing an excess of clinical events. There are currently at least 22 BRS devices in different stages of development, including many trials of device iterations with thinner (<150 µm) struts than first-generation BRS. This article reviews the outcomes of commercially available and potentially upcoming BRS, focusing on the most recent stages of clinical development and future directions for each scaffold type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5764868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Society of Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57648682018-01-12 Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Coronary Intervention: Unmet Needs and Evolution Capodanno, Davide Korean Circ J Review Article Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) represent a novel paradigm in the 40-year history of interventional cardiology. Restoration of cyclic pulsatility and physiologic vasomotion, adaptive vascular remodeling, plaque regression, and removal of the trigger for late adverse events are expected BRS benefits over current metallic drug-eluting stents. However, first-generation BRS devices have significant manufacturing limitations and rely on optimal implantation technique to avoid experiencing an excess of clinical events. There are currently at least 22 BRS devices in different stages of development, including many trials of device iterations with thinner (<150 µm) struts than first-generation BRS. This article reviews the outcomes of commercially available and potentially upcoming BRS, focusing on the most recent stages of clinical development and future directions for each scaffold type. The Korean Society of Cardiology 2017-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5764868/ /pubmed/29322695 http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2017.0194 Text en Copyright © 2018. The Korean Society of Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Capodanno, Davide
Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Coronary Intervention: Unmet Needs and Evolution
title Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Coronary Intervention: Unmet Needs and Evolution
title_full Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Coronary Intervention: Unmet Needs and Evolution
title_fullStr Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Coronary Intervention: Unmet Needs and Evolution
title_full_unstemmed Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Coronary Intervention: Unmet Needs and Evolution
title_short Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Coronary Intervention: Unmet Needs and Evolution
title_sort bioresorbable scaffolds in coronary intervention: unmet needs and evolution
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5764868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29322695
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2017.0194
work_keys_str_mv AT capodannodavide bioresorbablescaffoldsincoronaryinterventionunmetneedsandevolution