Cargando…

Comparison of Bladder Carcinogens in the Urine of E-cigarette Users Versus Non E-cigarette Using Controls

Electronic cigarette (EC) use is gaining popularity as a substitute for conventional smoking due to the perception and evidence it represents a safer alternative. In contrast to the common perception amongst users that ECs represent no risk initial studies have revealed a complex composition of e-ci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuller, Thomas W., Acharya, Abhinav P., Meyyappan, Thiagarajan, Yu, Michelle, Bhaskar, Godugu, Little, Steven R., Tarin, Tatum V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29323232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19030-1
_version_ 1783292173313114112
author Fuller, Thomas W.
Acharya, Abhinav P.
Meyyappan, Thiagarajan
Yu, Michelle
Bhaskar, Godugu
Little, Steven R.
Tarin, Tatum V.
author_facet Fuller, Thomas W.
Acharya, Abhinav P.
Meyyappan, Thiagarajan
Yu, Michelle
Bhaskar, Godugu
Little, Steven R.
Tarin, Tatum V.
author_sort Fuller, Thomas W.
collection PubMed
description Electronic cigarette (EC) use is gaining popularity as a substitute for conventional smoking due to the perception and evidence it represents a safer alternative. In contrast to the common perception amongst users that ECs represent no risk initial studies have revealed a complex composition of e-cigarette liquids. Conventional cigarette smoking is a known risk factor for developing bladder cancer and prior reports raise concern some of those causative compounds may exist in EC liquids or vapor. Urine samples were collected from 13 e-cigarette using subjects and 10 non e-cigarette using controls. Five known bladder carcinogens that are either present in conventional cigarettes, products of combustion, or solvents believed to be used in some e-cigarette formulations were quantified by liquid chromatography – mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Analysis of e-cigarette user urine revealed the presence of two carcinogenic compounds, o-toluidine and 2-naphthylamine, at a mean 2.3 and 1.3 fold higher concentration (p-value of 0.0013 and 0.014 respectively). Many of these subjects (9/13) were long term nonsmokers (>12 months). Further study is needed to clarify the safety profile of e-cigarettes and their contribution to the development of bladder cancer given the greater concentration of carcinogenic aromatic amines in the urine of e-cigarette users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5765148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57651482018-01-17 Comparison of Bladder Carcinogens in the Urine of E-cigarette Users Versus Non E-cigarette Using Controls Fuller, Thomas W. Acharya, Abhinav P. Meyyappan, Thiagarajan Yu, Michelle Bhaskar, Godugu Little, Steven R. Tarin, Tatum V. Sci Rep Article Electronic cigarette (EC) use is gaining popularity as a substitute for conventional smoking due to the perception and evidence it represents a safer alternative. In contrast to the common perception amongst users that ECs represent no risk initial studies have revealed a complex composition of e-cigarette liquids. Conventional cigarette smoking is a known risk factor for developing bladder cancer and prior reports raise concern some of those causative compounds may exist in EC liquids or vapor. Urine samples were collected from 13 e-cigarette using subjects and 10 non e-cigarette using controls. Five known bladder carcinogens that are either present in conventional cigarettes, products of combustion, or solvents believed to be used in some e-cigarette formulations were quantified by liquid chromatography – mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Analysis of e-cigarette user urine revealed the presence of two carcinogenic compounds, o-toluidine and 2-naphthylamine, at a mean 2.3 and 1.3 fold higher concentration (p-value of 0.0013 and 0.014 respectively). Many of these subjects (9/13) were long term nonsmokers (>12 months). Further study is needed to clarify the safety profile of e-cigarettes and their contribution to the development of bladder cancer given the greater concentration of carcinogenic aromatic amines in the urine of e-cigarette users. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5765148/ /pubmed/29323232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19030-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Fuller, Thomas W.
Acharya, Abhinav P.
Meyyappan, Thiagarajan
Yu, Michelle
Bhaskar, Godugu
Little, Steven R.
Tarin, Tatum V.
Comparison of Bladder Carcinogens in the Urine of E-cigarette Users Versus Non E-cigarette Using Controls
title Comparison of Bladder Carcinogens in the Urine of E-cigarette Users Versus Non E-cigarette Using Controls
title_full Comparison of Bladder Carcinogens in the Urine of E-cigarette Users Versus Non E-cigarette Using Controls
title_fullStr Comparison of Bladder Carcinogens in the Urine of E-cigarette Users Versus Non E-cigarette Using Controls
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Bladder Carcinogens in the Urine of E-cigarette Users Versus Non E-cigarette Using Controls
title_short Comparison of Bladder Carcinogens in the Urine of E-cigarette Users Versus Non E-cigarette Using Controls
title_sort comparison of bladder carcinogens in the urine of e-cigarette users versus non e-cigarette using controls
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29323232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19030-1
work_keys_str_mv AT fullerthomasw comparisonofbladdercarcinogensintheurineofecigaretteusersversusnonecigaretteusingcontrols
AT acharyaabhinavp comparisonofbladdercarcinogensintheurineofecigaretteusersversusnonecigaretteusingcontrols
AT meyyappanthiagarajan comparisonofbladdercarcinogensintheurineofecigaretteusersversusnonecigaretteusingcontrols
AT yumichelle comparisonofbladdercarcinogensintheurineofecigaretteusersversusnonecigaretteusingcontrols
AT bhaskargodugu comparisonofbladdercarcinogensintheurineofecigaretteusersversusnonecigaretteusingcontrols
AT littlestevenr comparisonofbladdercarcinogensintheurineofecigaretteusersversusnonecigaretteusingcontrols
AT tarintatumv comparisonofbladdercarcinogensintheurineofecigaretteusersversusnonecigaretteusingcontrols