Cargando…
Modeling cost‐effectiveness and health gains of a “universal” versus “prioritized” hepatitis C virus treatment policy in a real‐life cohort
We evaluated the cost‐effectiveness of two alternative direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) treatment policies in a real‐life cohort of hepatitis C virus–infected patients: policy 1, “universal,” treat all patients, regardless of fibrosis stage; policy 2, treat only “prioritized” patients, delay treatment...
Ejemplares similares
-
Forecasting Hepatitis C liver disease burden on real‐life data. Does the hidden iceberg matter to reach the elimination goals?
por: Kondili, Loreta A., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Advanced liver disease outcomes after hepatitis C eradication by human immunodeficiency virus infection in PITER cohort
por: Quaranta, Maria Giovanna, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
A prospective study of direct‐acting antiviral effectiveness and relapse risk in HCV cryoglobulinemic vasculitis by the Italian PITER cohort
por: Kondili, Loreta A., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Incidence of DAA failure and the clinical impact of retreatment in real-life patients treated in the advanced stage of liver disease: Interim evaluations from the PITER network
por: Kondili, Loreta A., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Correction: Real-life data on potential drug-drug interactions in patients with chronic hepatitis C viral infection undergoing antiviral therapy with interferon-free DAAs in the PITER Cohort Study
por: Kondili, Loreta A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)