Cargando…

Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study

BACKGROUND: This functional usability study assessed ease of use, fit, comfort, and potential clinical benefits of advanced pneumatic compression treatment of cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema. METHODS: Patient‐reported comfort and other treatment aspects were evaluated and multiple face and n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayrovitz, Harvey N., Ryan, Shelly, Hartman, James M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29131439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.24995
_version_ 1783292233740451840
author Mayrovitz, Harvey N.
Ryan, Shelly
Hartman, James M.
author_facet Mayrovitz, Harvey N.
Ryan, Shelly
Hartman, James M.
author_sort Mayrovitz, Harvey N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This functional usability study assessed ease of use, fit, comfort, and potential clinical benefits of advanced pneumatic compression treatment of cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema. METHODS: Patient‐reported comfort and other treatment aspects were evaluated and multiple face and neck measurements were obtained on 44 patients with head and neck lymphedema before and after 1 treatment session to assess usability and treatment‐related lymphedema changes. RESULTS: A majority of the patients (82%) reported the treatment was comfortable; most patients (61%) reported feeling better after treatment, and 93% reported that they would be likely to use this therapy at home. One treatment produced overall small but highly statistically significant reductions in composite metrics (mean ± SD) of the face (82.5 ± 4.3 cm vs 80.9 ± 4.1 cm; P < .001) and neck (120.4 ± 12.2 cm vs 119.2 ± 12.1 cm; P < .001) with no adverse events. CONCLUSION: Results found the treatment to be safe, easy to use, and well tolerated while demonstrating edema reduction after a single initial treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5765451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57654512018-02-01 Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study Mayrovitz, Harvey N. Ryan, Shelly Hartman, James M. Head Neck Original Articles BACKGROUND: This functional usability study assessed ease of use, fit, comfort, and potential clinical benefits of advanced pneumatic compression treatment of cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema. METHODS: Patient‐reported comfort and other treatment aspects were evaluated and multiple face and neck measurements were obtained on 44 patients with head and neck lymphedema before and after 1 treatment session to assess usability and treatment‐related lymphedema changes. RESULTS: A majority of the patients (82%) reported the treatment was comfortable; most patients (61%) reported feeling better after treatment, and 93% reported that they would be likely to use this therapy at home. One treatment produced overall small but highly statistically significant reductions in composite metrics (mean ± SD) of the face (82.5 ± 4.3 cm vs 80.9 ± 4.1 cm; P < .001) and neck (120.4 ± 12.2 cm vs 119.2 ± 12.1 cm; P < .001) with no adverse events. CONCLUSION: Results found the treatment to be safe, easy to use, and well tolerated while demonstrating edema reduction after a single initial treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-13 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5765451/ /pubmed/29131439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.24995 Text en © 2017 The Authors Head & Neck Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Mayrovitz, Harvey N.
Ryan, Shelly
Hartman, James M.
Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study
title Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study
title_full Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study
title_fullStr Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study
title_short Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study
title_sort usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: a feasibility study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29131439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.24995
work_keys_str_mv AT mayrovitzharveyn usabilityofadvancedpneumaticcompressiontotreatcancerrelatedheadandnecklymphedemaafeasibilitystudy
AT ryanshelly usabilityofadvancedpneumaticcompressiontotreatcancerrelatedheadandnecklymphedemaafeasibilitystudy
AT hartmanjamesm usabilityofadvancedpneumaticcompressiontotreatcancerrelatedheadandnecklymphedemaafeasibilitystudy