Cargando…
Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study
BACKGROUND: This functional usability study assessed ease of use, fit, comfort, and potential clinical benefits of advanced pneumatic compression treatment of cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema. METHODS: Patient‐reported comfort and other treatment aspects were evaluated and multiple face and n...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29131439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.24995 |
_version_ | 1783292233740451840 |
---|---|
author | Mayrovitz, Harvey N. Ryan, Shelly Hartman, James M. |
author_facet | Mayrovitz, Harvey N. Ryan, Shelly Hartman, James M. |
author_sort | Mayrovitz, Harvey N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This functional usability study assessed ease of use, fit, comfort, and potential clinical benefits of advanced pneumatic compression treatment of cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema. METHODS: Patient‐reported comfort and other treatment aspects were evaluated and multiple face and neck measurements were obtained on 44 patients with head and neck lymphedema before and after 1 treatment session to assess usability and treatment‐related lymphedema changes. RESULTS: A majority of the patients (82%) reported the treatment was comfortable; most patients (61%) reported feeling better after treatment, and 93% reported that they would be likely to use this therapy at home. One treatment produced overall small but highly statistically significant reductions in composite metrics (mean ± SD) of the face (82.5 ± 4.3 cm vs 80.9 ± 4.1 cm; P < .001) and neck (120.4 ± 12.2 cm vs 119.2 ± 12.1 cm; P < .001) with no adverse events. CONCLUSION: Results found the treatment to be safe, easy to use, and well tolerated while demonstrating edema reduction after a single initial treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5765451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57654512018-02-01 Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study Mayrovitz, Harvey N. Ryan, Shelly Hartman, James M. Head Neck Original Articles BACKGROUND: This functional usability study assessed ease of use, fit, comfort, and potential clinical benefits of advanced pneumatic compression treatment of cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema. METHODS: Patient‐reported comfort and other treatment aspects were evaluated and multiple face and neck measurements were obtained on 44 patients with head and neck lymphedema before and after 1 treatment session to assess usability and treatment‐related lymphedema changes. RESULTS: A majority of the patients (82%) reported the treatment was comfortable; most patients (61%) reported feeling better after treatment, and 93% reported that they would be likely to use this therapy at home. One treatment produced overall small but highly statistically significant reductions in composite metrics (mean ± SD) of the face (82.5 ± 4.3 cm vs 80.9 ± 4.1 cm; P < .001) and neck (120.4 ± 12.2 cm vs 119.2 ± 12.1 cm; P < .001) with no adverse events. CONCLUSION: Results found the treatment to be safe, easy to use, and well tolerated while demonstrating edema reduction after a single initial treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-13 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5765451/ /pubmed/29131439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.24995 Text en © 2017 The Authors Head & Neck Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Mayrovitz, Harvey N. Ryan, Shelly Hartman, James M. Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study |
title | Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study |
title_full | Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study |
title_short | Usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: A feasibility study |
title_sort | usability of advanced pneumatic compression to treat cancer‐related head and neck lymphedema: a feasibility study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29131439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.24995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayrovitzharveyn usabilityofadvancedpneumaticcompressiontotreatcancerrelatedheadandnecklymphedemaafeasibilitystudy AT ryanshelly usabilityofadvancedpneumaticcompressiontotreatcancerrelatedheadandnecklymphedemaafeasibilitystudy AT hartmanjamesm usabilityofadvancedpneumaticcompressiontotreatcancerrelatedheadandnecklymphedemaafeasibilitystudy |