Cargando…
Olmesartan‐based monotherapy vs combination therapy in hypertension: A meta‐analysis based on age and chronic kidney disease status
Antihypertensive monotherapy is often insufficient to control blood pressure (BP). Several recent guidelines advocate for initial combination drug therapy in many patients. This meta‐analysis of seven randomized, double‐blind studies (N = 5888) evaluated 8 weeks of olmesartan medoxomil (OM)–based si...
Autores principales: | Deedwania, Prakash, Weber, Michael, Reimitz, Paul‐Egbert, Bakris, George |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29067756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.13103 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A randomized titrate-to-target study comparing fixed-dose combinations of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone with olmesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in stage-2 systolic hypertension
por: Cushman, William C., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Olmesartan medoxomil: current status of its use in monotherapy
por: Brunner, Hans R
Publicado: (2006) -
Effects of azilsartan medoxomil compared with olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes
por: White, William B., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Preferable effects of olmesartan/calcium channel blocker to olmesartan/diuretic on blood pressure variability in very elderly hypertension: COLM study subanalysis
por: Rakugi, Hiromi, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Olmesartan/amlodipine vs olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome: the OLAS study
por: Martinez-Martin, F J, et al.
Publicado: (2011)