Cargando…

Evolution of precopulatory and post‐copulatory strategies of inbreeding avoidance and associated polyandry

Inbreeding depression is widely hypothesized to drive adaptive evolution of precopulatory and post‐copulatory mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance, which in turn are hypothesized to affect evolution of polyandry (i.e. female multiple mating). However, surprisingly little theory or modelling critically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duthie, A. B., Bocedi, G., Germain, R. R., Reid, J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28986951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13189
_version_ 1783292244322680832
author Duthie, A. B.
Bocedi, G.
Germain, R. R.
Reid, J. M.
author_facet Duthie, A. B.
Bocedi, G.
Germain, R. R.
Reid, J. M.
author_sort Duthie, A. B.
collection PubMed
description Inbreeding depression is widely hypothesized to drive adaptive evolution of precopulatory and post‐copulatory mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance, which in turn are hypothesized to affect evolution of polyandry (i.e. female multiple mating). However, surprisingly little theory or modelling critically examines selection for precopulatory or post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance, or both strategies, given evolutionary constraints and direct costs, or examines how evolution of inbreeding avoidance strategies might feed back to affect evolution of polyandry. Selection for post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance, but not for precopulatory inbreeding avoidance, requires polyandry, whereas interactions between precopulatory and post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance might cause functional redundancy (i.e. ‘degeneracy’) potentially generating complex evolutionary dynamics among inbreeding strategies and polyandry. We used individual‐based modelling to quantify evolution of interacting precopulatory and post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance and associated polyandry given strong inbreeding depression and different evolutionary constraints and direct costs. We found that evolution of post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance increased selection for initially rare polyandry and that evolution of a costly inbreeding avoidance strategy became negligible over time given a lower‐cost alternative strategy. Further, fixed precopulatory inbreeding avoidance often completely precluded evolution of polyandry and hence post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance, but fixed post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance did not preclude evolution of precopulatory inbreeding avoidance. Evolution of inbreeding avoidance phenotypes and associated polyandry is therefore affected by evolutionary feedbacks and degeneracy. All else being equal, evolution of precopulatory inbreeding avoidance and resulting low polyandry is more likely when post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance is precluded or costly, and evolution of post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance greatly facilitates evolution of costly polyandry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5765502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57655022018-02-01 Evolution of precopulatory and post‐copulatory strategies of inbreeding avoidance and associated polyandry Duthie, A. B. Bocedi, G. Germain, R. R. Reid, J. M. J Evol Biol Research Papers Inbreeding depression is widely hypothesized to drive adaptive evolution of precopulatory and post‐copulatory mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance, which in turn are hypothesized to affect evolution of polyandry (i.e. female multiple mating). However, surprisingly little theory or modelling critically examines selection for precopulatory or post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance, or both strategies, given evolutionary constraints and direct costs, or examines how evolution of inbreeding avoidance strategies might feed back to affect evolution of polyandry. Selection for post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance, but not for precopulatory inbreeding avoidance, requires polyandry, whereas interactions between precopulatory and post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance might cause functional redundancy (i.e. ‘degeneracy’) potentially generating complex evolutionary dynamics among inbreeding strategies and polyandry. We used individual‐based modelling to quantify evolution of interacting precopulatory and post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance and associated polyandry given strong inbreeding depression and different evolutionary constraints and direct costs. We found that evolution of post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance increased selection for initially rare polyandry and that evolution of a costly inbreeding avoidance strategy became negligible over time given a lower‐cost alternative strategy. Further, fixed precopulatory inbreeding avoidance often completely precluded evolution of polyandry and hence post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance, but fixed post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance did not preclude evolution of precopulatory inbreeding avoidance. Evolution of inbreeding avoidance phenotypes and associated polyandry is therefore affected by evolutionary feedbacks and degeneracy. All else being equal, evolution of precopulatory inbreeding avoidance and resulting low polyandry is more likely when post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance is precluded or costly, and evolution of post‐copulatory inbreeding avoidance greatly facilitates evolution of costly polyandry. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-03 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5765502/ /pubmed/28986951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13189 Text en © The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Duthie, A. B.
Bocedi, G.
Germain, R. R.
Reid, J. M.
Evolution of precopulatory and post‐copulatory strategies of inbreeding avoidance and associated polyandry
title Evolution of precopulatory and post‐copulatory strategies of inbreeding avoidance and associated polyandry
title_full Evolution of precopulatory and post‐copulatory strategies of inbreeding avoidance and associated polyandry
title_fullStr Evolution of precopulatory and post‐copulatory strategies of inbreeding avoidance and associated polyandry
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of precopulatory and post‐copulatory strategies of inbreeding avoidance and associated polyandry
title_short Evolution of precopulatory and post‐copulatory strategies of inbreeding avoidance and associated polyandry
title_sort evolution of precopulatory and post‐copulatory strategies of inbreeding avoidance and associated polyandry
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28986951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13189
work_keys_str_mv AT duthieab evolutionofprecopulatoryandpostcopulatorystrategiesofinbreedingavoidanceandassociatedpolyandry
AT bocedig evolutionofprecopulatoryandpostcopulatorystrategiesofinbreedingavoidanceandassociatedpolyandry
AT germainrr evolutionofprecopulatoryandpostcopulatorystrategiesofinbreedingavoidanceandassociatedpolyandry
AT reidjm evolutionofprecopulatoryandpostcopulatorystrategiesofinbreedingavoidanceandassociatedpolyandry