Cargando…
Photoelectrochemistry of Photosystem II in Vitro vs in Vivo
[Image: see text] Factors governing the photoelectrochemical output of photosynthetic microorganisms are poorly understood, and energy loss may occur due to inefficient electron transfer (ET) processes. Here, we systematically compare the photoelectrochemistry of photosystem II (PSII) protein-films...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical
Society
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28915035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b08563 |
_version_ | 1783292251653275648 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Jenny Z. Bombelli, Paolo Sokol, Katarzyna P. Fantuzzi, Andrea Rutherford, A. William Howe, Christopher J. Reisner, Erwin |
author_facet | Zhang, Jenny Z. Bombelli, Paolo Sokol, Katarzyna P. Fantuzzi, Andrea Rutherford, A. William Howe, Christopher J. Reisner, Erwin |
author_sort | Zhang, Jenny Z. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Factors governing the photoelectrochemical output of photosynthetic microorganisms are poorly understood, and energy loss may occur due to inefficient electron transfer (ET) processes. Here, we systematically compare the photoelectrochemistry of photosystem II (PSII) protein-films to cyanobacteria biofilms to derive: (i) the losses in light-to-charge conversion efficiencies, (ii) gains in photocatalytic longevity, and (iii) insights into the ET mechanism at the biofilm interface. This study was enabled by the use of hierarchically structured electrodes, which could be tailored for high/stable loadings of PSII core complexes and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 cells. The mediated photocurrent densities generated by the biofilm were 2 orders of magnitude lower than those of the protein-film. This was partly attributed to a lower photocatalyst loading as the rate of mediated electron extraction from PSII in vitro is only double that of PSII in vivo. On the other hand, the biofilm exhibited much greater longevity (>5 days) than the protein-film (<6 h), with turnover numbers surpassing those of the protein-film after 2 days. The mechanism of biofilm electrogenesis is suggested to involve an intracellular redox mediator, which is released during light irradiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5765535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | American Chemical
Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57655352018-01-14 Photoelectrochemistry of Photosystem II in Vitro vs in Vivo Zhang, Jenny Z. Bombelli, Paolo Sokol, Katarzyna P. Fantuzzi, Andrea Rutherford, A. William Howe, Christopher J. Reisner, Erwin J Am Chem Soc [Image: see text] Factors governing the photoelectrochemical output of photosynthetic microorganisms are poorly understood, and energy loss may occur due to inefficient electron transfer (ET) processes. Here, we systematically compare the photoelectrochemistry of photosystem II (PSII) protein-films to cyanobacteria biofilms to derive: (i) the losses in light-to-charge conversion efficiencies, (ii) gains in photocatalytic longevity, and (iii) insights into the ET mechanism at the biofilm interface. This study was enabled by the use of hierarchically structured electrodes, which could be tailored for high/stable loadings of PSII core complexes and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 cells. The mediated photocurrent densities generated by the biofilm were 2 orders of magnitude lower than those of the protein-film. This was partly attributed to a lower photocatalyst loading as the rate of mediated electron extraction from PSII in vitro is only double that of PSII in vivo. On the other hand, the biofilm exhibited much greater longevity (>5 days) than the protein-film (<6 h), with turnover numbers surpassing those of the protein-film after 2 days. The mechanism of biofilm electrogenesis is suggested to involve an intracellular redox mediator, which is released during light irradiation. American Chemical Society 2017-09-15 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5765535/ /pubmed/28915035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b08563 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Zhang, Jenny Z. Bombelli, Paolo Sokol, Katarzyna P. Fantuzzi, Andrea Rutherford, A. William Howe, Christopher J. Reisner, Erwin Photoelectrochemistry of Photosystem II in Vitro vs in Vivo |
title | Photoelectrochemistry
of Photosystem II in
Vitro vs in Vivo |
title_full | Photoelectrochemistry
of Photosystem II in
Vitro vs in Vivo |
title_fullStr | Photoelectrochemistry
of Photosystem II in
Vitro vs in Vivo |
title_full_unstemmed | Photoelectrochemistry
of Photosystem II in
Vitro vs in Vivo |
title_short | Photoelectrochemistry
of Photosystem II in
Vitro vs in Vivo |
title_sort | photoelectrochemistry
of photosystem ii in
vitro vs in vivo |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28915035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b08563 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjennyz photoelectrochemistryofphotosystemiiinvitrovsinvivo AT bombellipaolo photoelectrochemistryofphotosystemiiinvitrovsinvivo AT sokolkatarzynap photoelectrochemistryofphotosystemiiinvitrovsinvivo AT fantuzziandrea photoelectrochemistryofphotosystemiiinvitrovsinvivo AT rutherfordawilliam photoelectrochemistryofphotosystemiiinvitrovsinvivo AT howechristopherj photoelectrochemistryofphotosystemiiinvitrovsinvivo AT reisnererwin photoelectrochemistryofphotosystemiiinvitrovsinvivo |