Cargando…
A pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care
BACKGROUND: The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued recommendations for older, heavy lifetime smokers to complete annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans of the chest as screening for lung cancer. The USPSTF recommends and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Servi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29325548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0582-1 |
_version_ | 1783292266279862272 |
---|---|
author | Reuland, Daniel S. Cubillos, Laura Brenner, Alison T. Harris, Russell P. Minish, Bailey Pignone, Michael P. |
author_facet | Reuland, Daniel S. Cubillos, Laura Brenner, Alison T. Harris, Russell P. Minish, Bailey Pignone, Michael P. |
author_sort | Reuland, Daniel S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued recommendations for older, heavy lifetime smokers to complete annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans of the chest as screening for lung cancer. The USPSTF recommends and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services require shared decision making using a decision aid for lung cancer screening with annual LDCT. Little is known about how decision aids affect screening knowledge, preferences, and behavior. Thus, we tested a lung cancer screening decision aid video in screening-eligible primary care patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-group study with surveys before and after decision aid viewing and medical record review at 3 months. Participants were active patients of a large US academic primary care practice who were current or former smokers, ages 55–80 years, and eligible for screening based on current screening guidelines. Outcomes assessed pre-post decision aid viewing were screening-related knowledge score (9 items about screening-related harms of false positives and overdiagnosis, likelihood of benefit; score range = 0–9) and preference (preferred screening vs. not). Screening behavior measures, assessed via chart review, included provider visits, screening discussion, LDCT ordering, and LDCT completion within 3 months. RESULTS: Among 50 participants, knowledge increased from pre- to post-decision aid viewing (mean = 2.6 vs. 5.5, difference = 2.8; 95% CI 2.1, 3.6, p < 0.001). Preferences across the overall sample remained similar such that 54% preferred screening at baseline and 50% after viewing; however, 28% of participants changed their preference (to or away from screening) from baseline to after viewing. We assessed screening behavior for 36 participants who had a primary care visit during the 3-month period following enrollment. Eighteen of 36 preferred screening after decision aid viewing. Of these 18, 10 discussed screening, 8 had a test ordered, and 6 completed LDCT. Among the 18 who preferred no screening, 7 discussed screening, 5 had a test ordered, and 4 completed LDCT. CONCLUSIONS: In primary care patients, a lung cancer screening decision aid improved knowledge regarding screening-related benefits and harms. Screening preferences and behavior were heterogeneous. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov. NCT03077230 (registered retrospectively,November 22, 2016). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5765651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57656512018-01-17 A pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care Reuland, Daniel S. Cubillos, Laura Brenner, Alison T. Harris, Russell P. Minish, Bailey Pignone, Michael P. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued recommendations for older, heavy lifetime smokers to complete annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans of the chest as screening for lung cancer. The USPSTF recommends and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services require shared decision making using a decision aid for lung cancer screening with annual LDCT. Little is known about how decision aids affect screening knowledge, preferences, and behavior. Thus, we tested a lung cancer screening decision aid video in screening-eligible primary care patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-group study with surveys before and after decision aid viewing and medical record review at 3 months. Participants were active patients of a large US academic primary care practice who were current or former smokers, ages 55–80 years, and eligible for screening based on current screening guidelines. Outcomes assessed pre-post decision aid viewing were screening-related knowledge score (9 items about screening-related harms of false positives and overdiagnosis, likelihood of benefit; score range = 0–9) and preference (preferred screening vs. not). Screening behavior measures, assessed via chart review, included provider visits, screening discussion, LDCT ordering, and LDCT completion within 3 months. RESULTS: Among 50 participants, knowledge increased from pre- to post-decision aid viewing (mean = 2.6 vs. 5.5, difference = 2.8; 95% CI 2.1, 3.6, p < 0.001). Preferences across the overall sample remained similar such that 54% preferred screening at baseline and 50% after viewing; however, 28% of participants changed their preference (to or away from screening) from baseline to after viewing. We assessed screening behavior for 36 participants who had a primary care visit during the 3-month period following enrollment. Eighteen of 36 preferred screening after decision aid viewing. Of these 18, 10 discussed screening, 8 had a test ordered, and 6 completed LDCT. Among the 18 who preferred no screening, 7 discussed screening, 5 had a test ordered, and 4 completed LDCT. CONCLUSIONS: In primary care patients, a lung cancer screening decision aid improved knowledge regarding screening-related benefits and harms. Screening preferences and behavior were heterogeneous. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov. NCT03077230 (registered retrospectively,November 22, 2016). BioMed Central 2018-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5765651/ /pubmed/29325548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0582-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Reuland, Daniel S. Cubillos, Laura Brenner, Alison T. Harris, Russell P. Minish, Bailey Pignone, Michael P. A pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care |
title | A pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care |
title_full | A pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care |
title_fullStr | A pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | A pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care |
title_short | A pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care |
title_sort | pre-post study testing a lung cancer screening decision aid in primary care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29325548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0582-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reulanddaniels aprepoststudytestingalungcancerscreeningdecisionaidinprimarycare AT cubilloslaura aprepoststudytestingalungcancerscreeningdecisionaidinprimarycare AT brenneralisont aprepoststudytestingalungcancerscreeningdecisionaidinprimarycare AT harrisrussellp aprepoststudytestingalungcancerscreeningdecisionaidinprimarycare AT minishbailey aprepoststudytestingalungcancerscreeningdecisionaidinprimarycare AT pignonemichaelp aprepoststudytestingalungcancerscreeningdecisionaidinprimarycare AT reulanddaniels prepoststudytestingalungcancerscreeningdecisionaidinprimarycare AT cubilloslaura prepoststudytestingalungcancerscreeningdecisionaidinprimarycare AT brenneralisont prepoststudytestingalungcancerscreeningdecisionaidinprimarycare AT harrisrussellp prepoststudytestingalungcancerscreeningdecisionaidinprimarycare AT minishbailey prepoststudytestingalungcancerscreeningdecisionaidinprimarycare AT pignonemichaelp prepoststudytestingalungcancerscreeningdecisionaidinprimarycare |