Cargando…
Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials
BACKGROUND: Selective reporting of outcomes in clinical trials is a serious problem. We aimed to investigate the influence of the peer review process within biomedical journals on reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses within reports of randomised trials. METHODS: Each month, PubMe...
Autores principales: | Hopewell, Sally, Witt, Claudia M., Linde, Klaus, Icke, Katja, Adedire, Olubusola, Kirtley, Shona, Altman, Douglas G. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29325598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2395-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reporting characteristics of non-primary publications of results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional review
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Effectiveness of cognitive–behavioural therapy: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
por: Fordham, Beth, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2010)