Cargando…
Clinical research ethics review process in Lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees – results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials conducted in Lebanon are increasing. However, little is known about the performance of research ethics committees (RECs) in charge of reviewing the research protocols. This study aimed to assess the level of adherence to the ethics surrounding the conduct of clinical tria...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29325585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2397-2 |
_version_ | 1783292270305345536 |
---|---|
author | Atallah, David Moubarak, Malak El Kassis, Nadine Abboud, Sara |
author_facet | Atallah, David Moubarak, Malak El Kassis, Nadine Abboud, Sara |
author_sort | Atallah, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical trials conducted in Lebanon are increasing. However, little is known about the performance of research ethics committees (RECs) in charge of reviewing the research protocols. This study aimed to assess the level of adherence to the ethics surrounding the conduct of clinical trials and perceptions of team members regarding roles of the RECs during the conduct of clinical trials in Lebanon. The research question was: Are RECs adherent to the ethics surrounding the conduct of clinical trials (chapters II and IV in ‘Standards and Operational Guidance for Ethics Review of Health-related Research with Human Participants’ in Lebanon?’ METHODS: This was a quantitative and descriptive questionnaire-based study conducted among RECs of university hospitals in Lebanon. The questionnaire had to be completed online and included general questions in addition to items reflecting the different aspects of a REC performance and effectiveness. All the questionnaire was assigned a total score of 175 points. General information and questions assigned point values/scores were analysed using descriptive statistics: frequency and percentage, mean score ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Ten RECs participated in the study (52 persons: four chairs, one vice-president, 47 ordinary members). Forty-seven (90.4%) had previous experience with clinical research and 30 (57.7%) had a diploma or had done a training in research ethics. Forty-one percent confirmed that they were required to have a training in research ethics. All RECs had a policy for disclosing and managing potential conflicts of interest for its members, but 71.8% of participants reported the existence of such a policy for researchers. Thirty-three point three percent reported that the RECs had an anti-bribery policy. The questionnaire mean score was 129.6 ± 22.3/175 points reflecting thus an excellent adherence to international standards. CONCLUSION: Inadequate training of REC members and the lack of anti-bribery policies should be resolved to improve their performance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2397-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5765668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57656682018-01-17 Clinical research ethics review process in Lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees – results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study Atallah, David Moubarak, Malak El Kassis, Nadine Abboud, Sara Trials Research BACKGROUND: Clinical trials conducted in Lebanon are increasing. However, little is known about the performance of research ethics committees (RECs) in charge of reviewing the research protocols. This study aimed to assess the level of adherence to the ethics surrounding the conduct of clinical trials and perceptions of team members regarding roles of the RECs during the conduct of clinical trials in Lebanon. The research question was: Are RECs adherent to the ethics surrounding the conduct of clinical trials (chapters II and IV in ‘Standards and Operational Guidance for Ethics Review of Health-related Research with Human Participants’ in Lebanon?’ METHODS: This was a quantitative and descriptive questionnaire-based study conducted among RECs of university hospitals in Lebanon. The questionnaire had to be completed online and included general questions in addition to items reflecting the different aspects of a REC performance and effectiveness. All the questionnaire was assigned a total score of 175 points. General information and questions assigned point values/scores were analysed using descriptive statistics: frequency and percentage, mean score ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Ten RECs participated in the study (52 persons: four chairs, one vice-president, 47 ordinary members). Forty-seven (90.4%) had previous experience with clinical research and 30 (57.7%) had a diploma or had done a training in research ethics. Forty-one percent confirmed that they were required to have a training in research ethics. All RECs had a policy for disclosing and managing potential conflicts of interest for its members, but 71.8% of participants reported the existence of such a policy for researchers. Thirty-three point three percent reported that the RECs had an anti-bribery policy. The questionnaire mean score was 129.6 ± 22.3/175 points reflecting thus an excellent adherence to international standards. CONCLUSION: Inadequate training of REC members and the lack of anti-bribery policies should be resolved to improve their performance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2397-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5765668/ /pubmed/29325585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2397-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Atallah, David Moubarak, Malak El Kassis, Nadine Abboud, Sara Clinical research ethics review process in Lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees – results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study |
title | Clinical research ethics review process in Lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees – results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study |
title_full | Clinical research ethics review process in Lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees – results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study |
title_fullStr | Clinical research ethics review process in Lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees – results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical research ethics review process in Lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees – results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study |
title_short | Clinical research ethics review process in Lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees – results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study |
title_sort | clinical research ethics review process in lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees – results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29325585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2397-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atallahdavid clinicalresearchethicsreviewprocessinlebanonefficiencyandfunctionsofresearchethicscommitteesresultsfromadescriptivequestionnairebasedstudy AT moubarakmalak clinicalresearchethicsreviewprocessinlebanonefficiencyandfunctionsofresearchethicscommitteesresultsfromadescriptivequestionnairebasedstudy AT elkassisnadine clinicalresearchethicsreviewprocessinlebanonefficiencyandfunctionsofresearchethicscommitteesresultsfromadescriptivequestionnairebasedstudy AT abboudsara clinicalresearchethicsreviewprocessinlebanonefficiencyandfunctionsofresearchethicscommitteesresultsfromadescriptivequestionnairebasedstudy |