Cargando…

Arthroscopic remplissage: Is it still an option?

Posterolateral humeral head defects can be large and engage on the anterior glenoid, and they usually contribute to anterior shoulder instability in 40% to 90% of cases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of the largest series of patients who underwent arthroscopic remplissage with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Morsy, Mohamed G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29387470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.160070
_version_ 1783292304606363648
author Morsy, Mohamed G.
author_facet Morsy, Mohamed G.
author_sort Morsy, Mohamed G.
collection PubMed
description Posterolateral humeral head defects can be large and engage on the anterior glenoid, and they usually contribute to anterior shoulder instability in 40% to 90% of cases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of the largest series of patients who underwent arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability due to associated Bankart lesions, with large and engaging (> 25% involvement) humeral Hill-Sachs defects (HSDs). A total of 51 patients underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage technique for the treatment of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability with large and medial HSDs. Pre-operative imaging in all patients identified a Bankart lesion with an associated HSD that involved > 25% of the humeral head. The Rowe score was used to assess the patients clinically. A total of 46 patients were male. The mean age of the patients was 28.7 years (18 to 43). The mean follow-up period was 31 months (20 to 39). At the final follow-up, three patients reported recurrence of instability (two dislocations and one subluxation). The mean Rowe score improved to 95.4 points (function, 45.5 of 50; stability, 26.4 of 30; motion, 8 of 10; pain, 8 of 10). The arthroscopic remplissage technique with Bankart repair gave satisfactory results and is still considered to be an effective, safe and reliable procedure for treatment of glenohumeral instability in cases with large and medial HSDs. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:478–483. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160070
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5765988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57659882018-01-31 Arthroscopic remplissage: Is it still an option? Morsy, Mohamed G. EFORT Open Rev Shoulder & Elbow Posterolateral humeral head defects can be large and engage on the anterior glenoid, and they usually contribute to anterior shoulder instability in 40% to 90% of cases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of the largest series of patients who underwent arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability due to associated Bankart lesions, with large and engaging (> 25% involvement) humeral Hill-Sachs defects (HSDs). A total of 51 patients underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage technique for the treatment of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability with large and medial HSDs. Pre-operative imaging in all patients identified a Bankart lesion with an associated HSD that involved > 25% of the humeral head. The Rowe score was used to assess the patients clinically. A total of 46 patients were male. The mean age of the patients was 28.7 years (18 to 43). The mean follow-up period was 31 months (20 to 39). At the final follow-up, three patients reported recurrence of instability (two dislocations and one subluxation). The mean Rowe score improved to 95.4 points (function, 45.5 of 50; stability, 26.4 of 30; motion, 8 of 10; pain, 8 of 10). The arthroscopic remplissage technique with Bankart repair gave satisfactory results and is still considered to be an effective, safe and reliable procedure for treatment of glenohumeral instability in cases with large and medial HSDs. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:478–483. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160070 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2017-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5765988/ /pubmed/29387470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.160070 Text en © 2017 The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.
spellingShingle Shoulder & Elbow
Morsy, Mohamed G.
Arthroscopic remplissage: Is it still an option?
title Arthroscopic remplissage: Is it still an option?
title_full Arthroscopic remplissage: Is it still an option?
title_fullStr Arthroscopic remplissage: Is it still an option?
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic remplissage: Is it still an option?
title_short Arthroscopic remplissage: Is it still an option?
title_sort arthroscopic remplissage: is it still an option?
topic Shoulder & Elbow
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5765988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29387470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.160070
work_keys_str_mv AT morsymohamedg arthroscopicremplissageisitstillanoption