Cargando…

Calcium sulfate induced versus PMMA-induced membrane in a critical-sized femoral defect in a rat model

Aimed to investigate the characteristics of CS-induced membrane in comparison with the PMMA-induced membrane. Cellular components, histological changes, growth factor expressions of IL-6, VEGF, BMP-2, and TGF-β1 in the two induced membranes were compared at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks, respectively. We also...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yun-fei, Jiang, Nan, Zhang, Xiang, Qin, Cheng-he, Wang, Lei, Hu, Yan-jun, Lin, Qing-rong, Yu, Bin, Wang, Bo-wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5766563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29330453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17430-x
_version_ 1783292377405849600
author Ma, Yun-fei
Jiang, Nan
Zhang, Xiang
Qin, Cheng-he
Wang, Lei
Hu, Yan-jun
Lin, Qing-rong
Yu, Bin
Wang, Bo-wei
author_facet Ma, Yun-fei
Jiang, Nan
Zhang, Xiang
Qin, Cheng-he
Wang, Lei
Hu, Yan-jun
Lin, Qing-rong
Yu, Bin
Wang, Bo-wei
author_sort Ma, Yun-fei
collection PubMed
description Aimed to investigate the characteristics of CS-induced membrane in comparison with the PMMA-induced membrane. Cellular components, histological changes, growth factor expressions of IL-6, VEGF, BMP-2, and TGF-β1 in the two induced membranes were compared at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks, respectively. We also compared the histological changes at the bone defects between CS and PMMA groups. The structural characteristics of induced membrane were similar between CS and PMMA. Endochondral ossification took place in the CS-induced membrane at 8 week. Levels of VEGF, BMP-2 and TGF-β1 in CS-induced membrane were insignificantly higher than those in PMMA-induced membrane at different time points. The expression of IL-6 was significantly higher in PMMA-induced membranes at 2nd week. In addition, osteogenic and neovascular activities of induced membranes increased with time and peaked at 6 weeks. CS promoted endochondral ossification at the broken ends of the bone defect than PMMA did. CS-induced membrane has a better capacity of generating VEGF, BMP-2 and TGF-β1.osteogenic and neovascular activities achieve highest level at 6 week. CS may have the potential to replace PMMA as a novel spacer in Masquelet technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5766563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57665632018-01-17 Calcium sulfate induced versus PMMA-induced membrane in a critical-sized femoral defect in a rat model Ma, Yun-fei Jiang, Nan Zhang, Xiang Qin, Cheng-he Wang, Lei Hu, Yan-jun Lin, Qing-rong Yu, Bin Wang, Bo-wei Sci Rep Article Aimed to investigate the characteristics of CS-induced membrane in comparison with the PMMA-induced membrane. Cellular components, histological changes, growth factor expressions of IL-6, VEGF, BMP-2, and TGF-β1 in the two induced membranes were compared at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks, respectively. We also compared the histological changes at the bone defects between CS and PMMA groups. The structural characteristics of induced membrane were similar between CS and PMMA. Endochondral ossification took place in the CS-induced membrane at 8 week. Levels of VEGF, BMP-2 and TGF-β1 in CS-induced membrane were insignificantly higher than those in PMMA-induced membrane at different time points. The expression of IL-6 was significantly higher in PMMA-induced membranes at 2nd week. In addition, osteogenic and neovascular activities of induced membranes increased with time and peaked at 6 weeks. CS promoted endochondral ossification at the broken ends of the bone defect than PMMA did. CS-induced membrane has a better capacity of generating VEGF, BMP-2 and TGF-β1.osteogenic and neovascular activities achieve highest level at 6 week. CS may have the potential to replace PMMA as a novel spacer in Masquelet technique. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5766563/ /pubmed/29330453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17430-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ma, Yun-fei
Jiang, Nan
Zhang, Xiang
Qin, Cheng-he
Wang, Lei
Hu, Yan-jun
Lin, Qing-rong
Yu, Bin
Wang, Bo-wei
Calcium sulfate induced versus PMMA-induced membrane in a critical-sized femoral defect in a rat model
title Calcium sulfate induced versus PMMA-induced membrane in a critical-sized femoral defect in a rat model
title_full Calcium sulfate induced versus PMMA-induced membrane in a critical-sized femoral defect in a rat model
title_fullStr Calcium sulfate induced versus PMMA-induced membrane in a critical-sized femoral defect in a rat model
title_full_unstemmed Calcium sulfate induced versus PMMA-induced membrane in a critical-sized femoral defect in a rat model
title_short Calcium sulfate induced versus PMMA-induced membrane in a critical-sized femoral defect in a rat model
title_sort calcium sulfate induced versus pmma-induced membrane in a critical-sized femoral defect in a rat model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5766563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29330453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17430-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mayunfei calciumsulfateinducedversuspmmainducedmembraneinacriticalsizedfemoraldefectinaratmodel
AT jiangnan calciumsulfateinducedversuspmmainducedmembraneinacriticalsizedfemoraldefectinaratmodel
AT zhangxiang calciumsulfateinducedversuspmmainducedmembraneinacriticalsizedfemoraldefectinaratmodel
AT qinchenghe calciumsulfateinducedversuspmmainducedmembraneinacriticalsizedfemoraldefectinaratmodel
AT wanglei calciumsulfateinducedversuspmmainducedmembraneinacriticalsizedfemoraldefectinaratmodel
AT huyanjun calciumsulfateinducedversuspmmainducedmembraneinacriticalsizedfemoraldefectinaratmodel
AT linqingrong calciumsulfateinducedversuspmmainducedmembraneinacriticalsizedfemoraldefectinaratmodel
AT yubin calciumsulfateinducedversuspmmainducedmembraneinacriticalsizedfemoraldefectinaratmodel
AT wangbowei calciumsulfateinducedversuspmmainducedmembraneinacriticalsizedfemoraldefectinaratmodel