Cargando…
Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Fear of Childbirth (FOC) is a common problem affecting women’s health and wellbeing, and a common reason for requesting caesarean section. The aims of this review were to summarise published research on prevalence of FOC in childbearing women and how it is defined and measured during pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5766978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29329526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7 |
_version_ | 1783292452240621568 |
---|---|
author | Nilsson, C. Hessman, E. Sjöblom, H. Dencker, A. Jangsten, E. Mollberg, M. Patel, H. Sparud-Lundin, C. Wigert, H. Begley, C. |
author_facet | Nilsson, C. Hessman, E. Sjöblom, H. Dencker, A. Jangsten, E. Mollberg, M. Patel, H. Sparud-Lundin, C. Wigert, H. Begley, C. |
author_sort | Nilsson, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fear of Childbirth (FOC) is a common problem affecting women’s health and wellbeing, and a common reason for requesting caesarean section. The aims of this review were to summarise published research on prevalence of FOC in childbearing women and how it is defined and measured during pregnancy and postpartum, and to search for useful measures of FOC, for research as well as for clinical settings. METHODS: Five bibliographic databases in March 2015 were searched for published research on FOC, using a protocol agreed a priori. The quality of selected studies was assessed independently by pairs of authors. Prevalence data, definitions and methods of measurement were extracted independently from each included study by pairs of authors. Finally, some of the country rates were combined and compared. RESULTS: In total, 12,188 citations were identified and screened by title and abstract; 11,698 were excluded and full-text of 490 assessed for analysis. Of these, 466 were excluded leaving 24 papers included in the review, presenting prevalence of FOC from nine countries in Europe, Australia, Canada and the United States. Various definitions and measurements of FOC were used. The most frequently-used scale was the W-DEQ with various cut-off points describing moderate, severe/intense and extreme/phobic fear. Different 3-, 4-, and 5/6 point scales and visual analogue scales were also used. Country rates (as measured by seven studies using W-DEQ with ≥85 cut-off point) varied from 6.3 to 14.8%, a significant difference (chi-square = 104.44, d.f. = 6, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of severe FOC, measured in the same way, varied in different countries. Reasons why FOC might differ are unknown, and further research is necessary. Future studies on FOC should use the W-DEQ tool with a cut-off point of ≥85, or a more thoroughly tested version of the FOBS scale, or a three-point scale measurement of FOC using a single question as ‘Are you afraid about the birth?’ In this way, valid comparisons in research can be made. Moreover, validation of a clinical tool that is more focussed on FOC alone, and easier than the longer W-DEQ, for women to fill in and clinicians to administer, is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5766978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57669782018-01-17 Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review Nilsson, C. Hessman, E. Sjöblom, H. Dencker, A. Jangsten, E. Mollberg, M. Patel, H. Sparud-Lundin, C. Wigert, H. Begley, C. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Fear of Childbirth (FOC) is a common problem affecting women’s health and wellbeing, and a common reason for requesting caesarean section. The aims of this review were to summarise published research on prevalence of FOC in childbearing women and how it is defined and measured during pregnancy and postpartum, and to search for useful measures of FOC, for research as well as for clinical settings. METHODS: Five bibliographic databases in March 2015 were searched for published research on FOC, using a protocol agreed a priori. The quality of selected studies was assessed independently by pairs of authors. Prevalence data, definitions and methods of measurement were extracted independently from each included study by pairs of authors. Finally, some of the country rates were combined and compared. RESULTS: In total, 12,188 citations were identified and screened by title and abstract; 11,698 were excluded and full-text of 490 assessed for analysis. Of these, 466 were excluded leaving 24 papers included in the review, presenting prevalence of FOC from nine countries in Europe, Australia, Canada and the United States. Various definitions and measurements of FOC were used. The most frequently-used scale was the W-DEQ with various cut-off points describing moderate, severe/intense and extreme/phobic fear. Different 3-, 4-, and 5/6 point scales and visual analogue scales were also used. Country rates (as measured by seven studies using W-DEQ with ≥85 cut-off point) varied from 6.3 to 14.8%, a significant difference (chi-square = 104.44, d.f. = 6, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of severe FOC, measured in the same way, varied in different countries. Reasons why FOC might differ are unknown, and further research is necessary. Future studies on FOC should use the W-DEQ tool with a cut-off point of ≥85, or a more thoroughly tested version of the FOBS scale, or a three-point scale measurement of FOC using a single question as ‘Are you afraid about the birth?’ In this way, valid comparisons in research can be made. Moreover, validation of a clinical tool that is more focussed on FOC alone, and easier than the longer W-DEQ, for women to fill in and clinicians to administer, is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5766978/ /pubmed/29329526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nilsson, C. Hessman, E. Sjöblom, H. Dencker, A. Jangsten, E. Mollberg, M. Patel, H. Sparud-Lundin, C. Wigert, H. Begley, C. Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review |
title | Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review |
title_full | Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review |
title_short | Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review |
title_sort | definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5766978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29329526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nilssonc definitionsmeasurementsandprevalenceoffearofchildbirthasystematicreview AT hessmane definitionsmeasurementsandprevalenceoffearofchildbirthasystematicreview AT sjoblomh definitionsmeasurementsandprevalenceoffearofchildbirthasystematicreview AT denckera definitionsmeasurementsandprevalenceoffearofchildbirthasystematicreview AT jangstene definitionsmeasurementsandprevalenceoffearofchildbirthasystematicreview AT mollbergm definitionsmeasurementsandprevalenceoffearofchildbirthasystematicreview AT patelh definitionsmeasurementsandprevalenceoffearofchildbirthasystematicreview AT sparudlundinc definitionsmeasurementsandprevalenceoffearofchildbirthasystematicreview AT wigerth definitionsmeasurementsandprevalenceoffearofchildbirthasystematicreview AT begleyc definitionsmeasurementsandprevalenceoffearofchildbirthasystematicreview |