Cargando…

Binding affinities of the farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 estimated by free-energy perturbation and docking

We have studied the binding of 102 ligands to the farnesoid X receptor within the D3R Grand Challenge 2016 blind-prediction competition. First, we employed docking with five different docking software and scoring functions. The selected docked poses gave an average root-mean-squared deviation of 4.2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olsson, Martin A., García-Sosa, Alfonso T., Ryde, Ulf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28879536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-017-0056-z
_version_ 1783292489825779712
author Olsson, Martin A.
García-Sosa, Alfonso T.
Ryde, Ulf
author_facet Olsson, Martin A.
García-Sosa, Alfonso T.
Ryde, Ulf
author_sort Olsson, Martin A.
collection PubMed
description We have studied the binding of 102 ligands to the farnesoid X receptor within the D3R Grand Challenge 2016 blind-prediction competition. First, we employed docking with five different docking software and scoring functions. The selected docked poses gave an average root-mean-squared deviation of 4.2 Å. Consensus scoring gave decent results with a Kendall’s τ of 0.26 ± 0.06 and a Spearman’s ρ of 0.41 ± 0.08. For a subset of 33 ligands, we calculated relative binding free energies with free-energy perturbation. Five transformations between the ligands involved a change of the net charge and we implemented and benchmarked a semi-analytic correction (Rocklin et al., J Chem Phys 139:184103, 2013) for artifacts caused by the periodic boundary conditions and Ewald summation. The results gave a mean absolute deviation of 7.5 kJ/mol compared to the experimental estimates and a correlation coefficient of R (2) = 0.1. These results were among the four best in this competition out of 22 submissions. The charge corrections were significant (7–8 kJ/mol) and always improved the results. By employing 23 intermediate states in the free-energy perturbation, there was a proper overlap between all states and the precision was 0.1–0.7 kJ/mol. However, thermodynamic cycles indicate that the sampling was insufficient in some of the perturbations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10822-017-0056-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5767205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57672052018-01-25 Binding affinities of the farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 estimated by free-energy perturbation and docking Olsson, Martin A. García-Sosa, Alfonso T. Ryde, Ulf J Comput Aided Mol Des Article We have studied the binding of 102 ligands to the farnesoid X receptor within the D3R Grand Challenge 2016 blind-prediction competition. First, we employed docking with five different docking software and scoring functions. The selected docked poses gave an average root-mean-squared deviation of 4.2 Å. Consensus scoring gave decent results with a Kendall’s τ of 0.26 ± 0.06 and a Spearman’s ρ of 0.41 ± 0.08. For a subset of 33 ligands, we calculated relative binding free energies with free-energy perturbation. Five transformations between the ligands involved a change of the net charge and we implemented and benchmarked a semi-analytic correction (Rocklin et al., J Chem Phys 139:184103, 2013) for artifacts caused by the periodic boundary conditions and Ewald summation. The results gave a mean absolute deviation of 7.5 kJ/mol compared to the experimental estimates and a correlation coefficient of R (2) = 0.1. These results were among the four best in this competition out of 22 submissions. The charge corrections were significant (7–8 kJ/mol) and always improved the results. By employing 23 intermediate states in the free-energy perturbation, there was a proper overlap between all states and the precision was 0.1–0.7 kJ/mol. However, thermodynamic cycles indicate that the sampling was insufficient in some of the perturbations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10822-017-0056-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-09-06 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5767205/ /pubmed/28879536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-017-0056-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Olsson, Martin A.
García-Sosa, Alfonso T.
Ryde, Ulf
Binding affinities of the farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 estimated by free-energy perturbation and docking
title Binding affinities of the farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 estimated by free-energy perturbation and docking
title_full Binding affinities of the farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 estimated by free-energy perturbation and docking
title_fullStr Binding affinities of the farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 estimated by free-energy perturbation and docking
title_full_unstemmed Binding affinities of the farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 estimated by free-energy perturbation and docking
title_short Binding affinities of the farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 estimated by free-energy perturbation and docking
title_sort binding affinities of the farnesoid x receptor in the d3r grand challenge 2 estimated by free-energy perturbation and docking
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28879536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-017-0056-z
work_keys_str_mv AT olssonmartina bindingaffinitiesofthefarnesoidxreceptorinthed3rgrandchallenge2estimatedbyfreeenergyperturbationanddocking
AT garciasosaalfonsot bindingaffinitiesofthefarnesoidxreceptorinthed3rgrandchallenge2estimatedbyfreeenergyperturbationanddocking
AT rydeulf bindingaffinitiesofthefarnesoidxreceptorinthed3rgrandchallenge2estimatedbyfreeenergyperturbationanddocking