Cargando…

Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of achieving pregnancy with focused intercourse in the fertile window identified using natural fertility indicators. METHODS: 24-cycle prospective effectiveness study. SETTING: A North American web-based fertility monitoring service. PARTICIPANTS: 256 North...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouchard, Thomas P., Fehring, Richard J., Schneider, Mary M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29376054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00250
_version_ 1783292497974263808
author Bouchard, Thomas P.
Fehring, Richard J.
Schneider, Mary M.
author_facet Bouchard, Thomas P.
Fehring, Richard J.
Schneider, Mary M.
author_sort Bouchard, Thomas P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of achieving pregnancy with focused intercourse in the fertile window identified using natural fertility indicators. METHODS: 24-cycle prospective effectiveness study. SETTING: A North American web-based fertility monitoring service. PARTICIPANTS: 256 North American women aged 20–43 (mean age 29.2 years) seeking to achieve pregnancy. INTERVENTION: Participants identified their fertile window with either electronic hormonal fertility monitoring or cervical mucus monitoring, or both, and recorded their observations on an online fertility tracking system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancies were validated by nurses with an online self-assessed pregnancy evaluation form. Survival analysis was used to determine pregnancy rates. RESULTS: There were 150 pregnancies among the 256 participants with an overall pregnancy rate of 78 per 100 women over 12 menstrual cycles. There were 54 pregnancies (68%) among the 80 women using the fertility monitor, 11 pregnancies (46%) among the 24 women using mucus monitoring, and 90 (63%) among the 143 women using both mucus and monitor. The 12-cycle pregnancy rates per 100 women were 83 (monitor group), 72 (mucus group), and 75 (mucus and monitor group). Pregnancy rates reached 100% at 24 cycles of use for those women using the hormonal fertility monitor. CONCLUSION: Use of the hormonal fertility monitor alone seems to offer the best natural estimate of the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle for women wishing to achieve a pregnancy. Focusing intercourse through 24 menstrual cycles can be beneficial for achieving pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5767237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57672372018-01-26 Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window Bouchard, Thomas P. Fehring, Richard J. Schneider, Mary M. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of achieving pregnancy with focused intercourse in the fertile window identified using natural fertility indicators. METHODS: 24-cycle prospective effectiveness study. SETTING: A North American web-based fertility monitoring service. PARTICIPANTS: 256 North American women aged 20–43 (mean age 29.2 years) seeking to achieve pregnancy. INTERVENTION: Participants identified their fertile window with either electronic hormonal fertility monitoring or cervical mucus monitoring, or both, and recorded their observations on an online fertility tracking system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancies were validated by nurses with an online self-assessed pregnancy evaluation form. Survival analysis was used to determine pregnancy rates. RESULTS: There were 150 pregnancies among the 256 participants with an overall pregnancy rate of 78 per 100 women over 12 menstrual cycles. There were 54 pregnancies (68%) among the 80 women using the fertility monitor, 11 pregnancies (46%) among the 24 women using mucus monitoring, and 90 (63%) among the 143 women using both mucus and monitor. The 12-cycle pregnancy rates per 100 women were 83 (monitor group), 72 (mucus group), and 75 (mucus and monitor group). Pregnancy rates reached 100% at 24 cycles of use for those women using the hormonal fertility monitor. CONCLUSION: Use of the hormonal fertility monitor alone seems to offer the best natural estimate of the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle for women wishing to achieve a pregnancy. Focusing intercourse through 24 menstrual cycles can be beneficial for achieving pregnancy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5767237/ /pubmed/29376054 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00250 Text en Copyright © 2018 Bouchard, Fehring and Schneider. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Bouchard, Thomas P.
Fehring, Richard J.
Schneider, Mary M.
Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window
title Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window
title_full Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window
title_fullStr Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window
title_full_unstemmed Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window
title_short Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window
title_sort achieving pregnancy using primary care interventions to identify the fertile window
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29376054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00250
work_keys_str_mv AT bouchardthomasp achievingpregnancyusingprimarycareinterventionstoidentifythefertilewindow
AT fehringrichardj achievingpregnancyusingprimarycareinterventionstoidentifythefertilewindow
AT schneidermarym achievingpregnancyusingprimarycareinterventionstoidentifythefertilewindow