Cargando…

Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients

INTRODUCTION: Therapy with chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cells for hematological malignancies has shown promising results. Effectiveness of CART cells may depend on the ratio of naive (T(N)) vs. effector (T(E)) T cells, T(N) cells being responsible for an enduring antitumor activity through mat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffmann, Jean-Marc, Schubert, Maria-Luisa, Wang, Lei, Hückelhoven, Angela, Sellner, Leopold, Stock, Sophia, Schmitt, Anita, Kleist, Christian, Gern, Ulrike, Loskog, Angelica, Wuchter, Patrick, Hofmann, Susanne, Ho, Anthony D., Müller-Tidow, Carsten, Dreger, Peter, Schmitt, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375575
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01956
_version_ 1783292562930401280
author Hoffmann, Jean-Marc
Schubert, Maria-Luisa
Wang, Lei
Hückelhoven, Angela
Sellner, Leopold
Stock, Sophia
Schmitt, Anita
Kleist, Christian
Gern, Ulrike
Loskog, Angelica
Wuchter, Patrick
Hofmann, Susanne
Ho, Anthony D.
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Dreger, Peter
Schmitt, Michael
author_facet Hoffmann, Jean-Marc
Schubert, Maria-Luisa
Wang, Lei
Hückelhoven, Angela
Sellner, Leopold
Stock, Sophia
Schmitt, Anita
Kleist, Christian
Gern, Ulrike
Loskog, Angelica
Wuchter, Patrick
Hofmann, Susanne
Ho, Anthony D.
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Dreger, Peter
Schmitt, Michael
author_sort Hoffmann, Jean-Marc
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Therapy with chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cells for hematological malignancies has shown promising results. Effectiveness of CART cells may depend on the ratio of naive (T(N)) vs. effector (T(E)) T cells, T(N) cells being responsible for an enduring antitumor activity through maturation. Therefore, we investigated factors influencing the T(N)/T(E) ratio of CART cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CART cells were generated upon transduction of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with a CD19.CAR-CD28-CD137zeta third generation retroviral vector under two different stimulating culture conditions: anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies adding either interleukin (IL)-7/IL-15 or IL-2. CART cells were maintained in culture for 20 days. We evaluated 24 healthy donors (HDs) and 11 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) for the composition of cell subsets and produced CART cells. Phenotype and functionality were tested using flow cytometry and chromium release assays. RESULTS: IL-7/IL-15 preferentially induced differentiation into T(N), stem cell memory (T(SCM): naive CD27+ CD95+), CD4+ and CXCR3+ CART cells, while IL-2 increased effector memory (T(EM)), CD56+ and CD4+ T regulatory (T(Reg)) CART cells. The net amplification of different CART subpopulations derived from HDs and untreated CLL patients was compared. Particularly the expansion of CD4+ CART(N) cells differed significantly between the two groups. For HDs, this subtype expanded >60-fold, whereas CD4+ CART(N) cells of untreated CLL patients expanded less than 10-fold. Expression of exhaustion marker programmed cell death 1 on CART(N) cells on day 10 of culture was significantly higher in patient samples compared to HD samples. As the percentage of malignant B cells was expectedly higher within patient samples, an excessive amount of B cells during culture could account for the reduced expansion potential of CART(N) cells in untreated CLL patients. Final T(N)/T(E) ratio stayed <0.3 despite stimulation condition for patients, whereas this ratio was >2 in samples from HDs stimulated with IL-7/IL-15, thus demonstrating efficient CART(N) expansion. CONCLUSION: Untreated CLL patients might constitute a challenge for long-lasting CART effects in vivo since only a low number of T(N) among the CART product could be generated. Depletion of malignant B cells before starting CART production might be considered to increase the T(N)/T(E) ratio within the CART product.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5767585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57675852018-01-26 Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients Hoffmann, Jean-Marc Schubert, Maria-Luisa Wang, Lei Hückelhoven, Angela Sellner, Leopold Stock, Sophia Schmitt, Anita Kleist, Christian Gern, Ulrike Loskog, Angelica Wuchter, Patrick Hofmann, Susanne Ho, Anthony D. Müller-Tidow, Carsten Dreger, Peter Schmitt, Michael Front Immunol Immunology INTRODUCTION: Therapy with chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cells for hematological malignancies has shown promising results. Effectiveness of CART cells may depend on the ratio of naive (T(N)) vs. effector (T(E)) T cells, T(N) cells being responsible for an enduring antitumor activity through maturation. Therefore, we investigated factors influencing the T(N)/T(E) ratio of CART cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CART cells were generated upon transduction of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with a CD19.CAR-CD28-CD137zeta third generation retroviral vector under two different stimulating culture conditions: anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies adding either interleukin (IL)-7/IL-15 or IL-2. CART cells were maintained in culture for 20 days. We evaluated 24 healthy donors (HDs) and 11 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) for the composition of cell subsets and produced CART cells. Phenotype and functionality were tested using flow cytometry and chromium release assays. RESULTS: IL-7/IL-15 preferentially induced differentiation into T(N), stem cell memory (T(SCM): naive CD27+ CD95+), CD4+ and CXCR3+ CART cells, while IL-2 increased effector memory (T(EM)), CD56+ and CD4+ T regulatory (T(Reg)) CART cells. The net amplification of different CART subpopulations derived from HDs and untreated CLL patients was compared. Particularly the expansion of CD4+ CART(N) cells differed significantly between the two groups. For HDs, this subtype expanded >60-fold, whereas CD4+ CART(N) cells of untreated CLL patients expanded less than 10-fold. Expression of exhaustion marker programmed cell death 1 on CART(N) cells on day 10 of culture was significantly higher in patient samples compared to HD samples. As the percentage of malignant B cells was expectedly higher within patient samples, an excessive amount of B cells during culture could account for the reduced expansion potential of CART(N) cells in untreated CLL patients. Final T(N)/T(E) ratio stayed <0.3 despite stimulation condition for patients, whereas this ratio was >2 in samples from HDs stimulated with IL-7/IL-15, thus demonstrating efficient CART(N) expansion. CONCLUSION: Untreated CLL patients might constitute a challenge for long-lasting CART effects in vivo since only a low number of T(N) among the CART product could be generated. Depletion of malignant B cells before starting CART production might be considered to increase the T(N)/T(E) ratio within the CART product. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5767585/ /pubmed/29375575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01956 Text en Copyright © 2018 Hoffmann, Schubert, Wang, Hückelhoven, Sellner, Stock, Schmitt, Kleist, Gern, Loskog, Wuchter, Hofmann, Ho, Müller-Tidow, Dreger and Schmitt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Hoffmann, Jean-Marc
Schubert, Maria-Luisa
Wang, Lei
Hückelhoven, Angela
Sellner, Leopold
Stock, Sophia
Schmitt, Anita
Kleist, Christian
Gern, Ulrike
Loskog, Angelica
Wuchter, Patrick
Hofmann, Susanne
Ho, Anthony D.
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Dreger, Peter
Schmitt, Michael
Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients
title Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients
title_full Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients
title_fullStr Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients
title_short Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients
title_sort differences in expansion potential of naive chimeric antigen receptor t cells from healthy donors and untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375575
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01956
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmannjeanmarc differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT schubertmarialuisa differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT wanglei differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT huckelhovenangela differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT sellnerleopold differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT stocksophia differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT schmittanita differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT kleistchristian differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT gernulrike differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT loskogangelica differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT wuchterpatrick differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT hofmannsusanne differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT hoanthonyd differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT mullertidowcarsten differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT dregerpeter differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients
AT schmittmichael differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients