Cargando…
Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients
INTRODUCTION: Therapy with chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cells for hematological malignancies has shown promising results. Effectiveness of CART cells may depend on the ratio of naive (T(N)) vs. effector (T(E)) T cells, T(N) cells being responsible for an enduring antitumor activity through mat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01956 |
_version_ | 1783292562930401280 |
---|---|
author | Hoffmann, Jean-Marc Schubert, Maria-Luisa Wang, Lei Hückelhoven, Angela Sellner, Leopold Stock, Sophia Schmitt, Anita Kleist, Christian Gern, Ulrike Loskog, Angelica Wuchter, Patrick Hofmann, Susanne Ho, Anthony D. Müller-Tidow, Carsten Dreger, Peter Schmitt, Michael |
author_facet | Hoffmann, Jean-Marc Schubert, Maria-Luisa Wang, Lei Hückelhoven, Angela Sellner, Leopold Stock, Sophia Schmitt, Anita Kleist, Christian Gern, Ulrike Loskog, Angelica Wuchter, Patrick Hofmann, Susanne Ho, Anthony D. Müller-Tidow, Carsten Dreger, Peter Schmitt, Michael |
author_sort | Hoffmann, Jean-Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Therapy with chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cells for hematological malignancies has shown promising results. Effectiveness of CART cells may depend on the ratio of naive (T(N)) vs. effector (T(E)) T cells, T(N) cells being responsible for an enduring antitumor activity through maturation. Therefore, we investigated factors influencing the T(N)/T(E) ratio of CART cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CART cells were generated upon transduction of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with a CD19.CAR-CD28-CD137zeta third generation retroviral vector under two different stimulating culture conditions: anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies adding either interleukin (IL)-7/IL-15 or IL-2. CART cells were maintained in culture for 20 days. We evaluated 24 healthy donors (HDs) and 11 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) for the composition of cell subsets and produced CART cells. Phenotype and functionality were tested using flow cytometry and chromium release assays. RESULTS: IL-7/IL-15 preferentially induced differentiation into T(N), stem cell memory (T(SCM): naive CD27+ CD95+), CD4+ and CXCR3+ CART cells, while IL-2 increased effector memory (T(EM)), CD56+ and CD4+ T regulatory (T(Reg)) CART cells. The net amplification of different CART subpopulations derived from HDs and untreated CLL patients was compared. Particularly the expansion of CD4+ CART(N) cells differed significantly between the two groups. For HDs, this subtype expanded >60-fold, whereas CD4+ CART(N) cells of untreated CLL patients expanded less than 10-fold. Expression of exhaustion marker programmed cell death 1 on CART(N) cells on day 10 of culture was significantly higher in patient samples compared to HD samples. As the percentage of malignant B cells was expectedly higher within patient samples, an excessive amount of B cells during culture could account for the reduced expansion potential of CART(N) cells in untreated CLL patients. Final T(N)/T(E) ratio stayed <0.3 despite stimulation condition for patients, whereas this ratio was >2 in samples from HDs stimulated with IL-7/IL-15, thus demonstrating efficient CART(N) expansion. CONCLUSION: Untreated CLL patients might constitute a challenge for long-lasting CART effects in vivo since only a low number of T(N) among the CART product could be generated. Depletion of malignant B cells before starting CART production might be considered to increase the T(N)/T(E) ratio within the CART product. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5767585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57675852018-01-26 Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients Hoffmann, Jean-Marc Schubert, Maria-Luisa Wang, Lei Hückelhoven, Angela Sellner, Leopold Stock, Sophia Schmitt, Anita Kleist, Christian Gern, Ulrike Loskog, Angelica Wuchter, Patrick Hofmann, Susanne Ho, Anthony D. Müller-Tidow, Carsten Dreger, Peter Schmitt, Michael Front Immunol Immunology INTRODUCTION: Therapy with chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cells for hematological malignancies has shown promising results. Effectiveness of CART cells may depend on the ratio of naive (T(N)) vs. effector (T(E)) T cells, T(N) cells being responsible for an enduring antitumor activity through maturation. Therefore, we investigated factors influencing the T(N)/T(E) ratio of CART cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CART cells were generated upon transduction of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with a CD19.CAR-CD28-CD137zeta third generation retroviral vector under two different stimulating culture conditions: anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies adding either interleukin (IL)-7/IL-15 or IL-2. CART cells were maintained in culture for 20 days. We evaluated 24 healthy donors (HDs) and 11 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) for the composition of cell subsets and produced CART cells. Phenotype and functionality were tested using flow cytometry and chromium release assays. RESULTS: IL-7/IL-15 preferentially induced differentiation into T(N), stem cell memory (T(SCM): naive CD27+ CD95+), CD4+ and CXCR3+ CART cells, while IL-2 increased effector memory (T(EM)), CD56+ and CD4+ T regulatory (T(Reg)) CART cells. The net amplification of different CART subpopulations derived from HDs and untreated CLL patients was compared. Particularly the expansion of CD4+ CART(N) cells differed significantly between the two groups. For HDs, this subtype expanded >60-fold, whereas CD4+ CART(N) cells of untreated CLL patients expanded less than 10-fold. Expression of exhaustion marker programmed cell death 1 on CART(N) cells on day 10 of culture was significantly higher in patient samples compared to HD samples. As the percentage of malignant B cells was expectedly higher within patient samples, an excessive amount of B cells during culture could account for the reduced expansion potential of CART(N) cells in untreated CLL patients. Final T(N)/T(E) ratio stayed <0.3 despite stimulation condition for patients, whereas this ratio was >2 in samples from HDs stimulated with IL-7/IL-15, thus demonstrating efficient CART(N) expansion. CONCLUSION: Untreated CLL patients might constitute a challenge for long-lasting CART effects in vivo since only a low number of T(N) among the CART product could be generated. Depletion of malignant B cells before starting CART production might be considered to increase the T(N)/T(E) ratio within the CART product. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5767585/ /pubmed/29375575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01956 Text en Copyright © 2018 Hoffmann, Schubert, Wang, Hückelhoven, Sellner, Stock, Schmitt, Kleist, Gern, Loskog, Wuchter, Hofmann, Ho, Müller-Tidow, Dreger and Schmitt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Hoffmann, Jean-Marc Schubert, Maria-Luisa Wang, Lei Hückelhoven, Angela Sellner, Leopold Stock, Sophia Schmitt, Anita Kleist, Christian Gern, Ulrike Loskog, Angelica Wuchter, Patrick Hofmann, Susanne Ho, Anthony D. Müller-Tidow, Carsten Dreger, Peter Schmitt, Michael Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients |
title | Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients |
title_full | Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients |
title_fullStr | Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients |
title_short | Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients |
title_sort | differences in expansion potential of naive chimeric antigen receptor t cells from healthy donors and untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01956 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoffmannjeanmarc differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT schubertmarialuisa differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT wanglei differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT huckelhovenangela differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT sellnerleopold differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT stocksophia differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT schmittanita differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT kleistchristian differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT gernulrike differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT loskogangelica differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT wuchterpatrick differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT hofmannsusanne differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT hoanthonyd differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT mullertidowcarsten differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT dregerpeter differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients AT schmittmichael differencesinexpansionpotentialofnaivechimericantigenreceptortcellsfromhealthydonorsanduntreatedchroniclymphocyticleukemiapatients |