Cargando…

No Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Multiple Sessions of Object-Location-Memory Training in Healthy Older Adults

Object-location memory (OLM) is known to decline with normal aging, a process accelerated in pathological conditions like mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In order to maintain cognitive health and to delay the transition from healthy to pathological conditions, novel strategies are being explored. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Külzow, Nadine, Cavalcanti de Sousa, Angelica Vieira, Cesarz, Magda, Hanke, Julie-Marie, Günsberg, Alida, Harder, Solvejg, Koblitz, Swantje, Grittner, Ulrike, Flöel, Agnes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375290
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00746
_version_ 1783292577105051648
author Külzow, Nadine
Cavalcanti de Sousa, Angelica Vieira
Cesarz, Magda
Hanke, Julie-Marie
Günsberg, Alida
Harder, Solvejg
Koblitz, Swantje
Grittner, Ulrike
Flöel, Agnes
author_facet Külzow, Nadine
Cavalcanti de Sousa, Angelica Vieira
Cesarz, Magda
Hanke, Julie-Marie
Günsberg, Alida
Harder, Solvejg
Koblitz, Swantje
Grittner, Ulrike
Flöel, Agnes
author_sort Külzow, Nadine
collection PubMed
description Object-location memory (OLM) is known to decline with normal aging, a process accelerated in pathological conditions like mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In order to maintain cognitive health and to delay the transition from healthy to pathological conditions, novel strategies are being explored. Tentative evidence suggests that combining cognitive training and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS), both reported to induce small and often inconsistent behavioral improvements, could generate larger or more consistent improvements or both, compared to each intervention alone. Here, we explored the combined efficacy of these techniques on OLM. In a subject-blind sham-controlled cross-over design 32 healthy older adults underwent a 3-day visuospatial training paired with either anodal (20 min) or sham (30 s) atDCS (1 mA, temporoparietal). Subjects were asked to learn the correct object-location pairings on a street map, shown over five learning blocks on each training day. Acquisition performance was assessed by accuracy on a given learning block in terms of percentage of correct responses. Training success (performance on last training day) and delayed memory after 1-month were analyzed by mixed model analysis and were controlled for gender, age, education, sequence of stimulation and baseline performance. Exploratory analysis of atDCS effects on within-session (online) and between-session (offline) memory performance were conducted. Moreover, transfer effects on similar trained (visuospatial) and less similar (visuo-constructive, verbal) untrained memory tasks were explored, both immediately after training, and on follow-up. We found that atDCS paired with OLM-training did not enhance success in training or performance in 1-month delayed memory or transfer tasks. In sum, this study did not support the notion that the combined atDCS-training approach improves immediate or delayed OLM in older adults. However, specifics of the experimental design, and a non-optimal timing of atDCS between sessions might have masked beneficial effects and should be more systematically addressed in future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5767718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57677182018-01-26 No Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Multiple Sessions of Object-Location-Memory Training in Healthy Older Adults Külzow, Nadine Cavalcanti de Sousa, Angelica Vieira Cesarz, Magda Hanke, Julie-Marie Günsberg, Alida Harder, Solvejg Koblitz, Swantje Grittner, Ulrike Flöel, Agnes Front Neurosci Neuroscience Object-location memory (OLM) is known to decline with normal aging, a process accelerated in pathological conditions like mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In order to maintain cognitive health and to delay the transition from healthy to pathological conditions, novel strategies are being explored. Tentative evidence suggests that combining cognitive training and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS), both reported to induce small and often inconsistent behavioral improvements, could generate larger or more consistent improvements or both, compared to each intervention alone. Here, we explored the combined efficacy of these techniques on OLM. In a subject-blind sham-controlled cross-over design 32 healthy older adults underwent a 3-day visuospatial training paired with either anodal (20 min) or sham (30 s) atDCS (1 mA, temporoparietal). Subjects were asked to learn the correct object-location pairings on a street map, shown over five learning blocks on each training day. Acquisition performance was assessed by accuracy on a given learning block in terms of percentage of correct responses. Training success (performance on last training day) and delayed memory after 1-month were analyzed by mixed model analysis and were controlled for gender, age, education, sequence of stimulation and baseline performance. Exploratory analysis of atDCS effects on within-session (online) and between-session (offline) memory performance were conducted. Moreover, transfer effects on similar trained (visuospatial) and less similar (visuo-constructive, verbal) untrained memory tasks were explored, both immediately after training, and on follow-up. We found that atDCS paired with OLM-training did not enhance success in training or performance in 1-month delayed memory or transfer tasks. In sum, this study did not support the notion that the combined atDCS-training approach improves immediate or delayed OLM in older adults. However, specifics of the experimental design, and a non-optimal timing of atDCS between sessions might have masked beneficial effects and should be more systematically addressed in future studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5767718/ /pubmed/29375290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00746 Text en Copyright © 2018 Külzow, Cavalcanti de Sousa, Cesarz, Hanke, Günsberg, Harder, Koblitz, Grittner and Flöel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Külzow, Nadine
Cavalcanti de Sousa, Angelica Vieira
Cesarz, Magda
Hanke, Julie-Marie
Günsberg, Alida
Harder, Solvejg
Koblitz, Swantje
Grittner, Ulrike
Flöel, Agnes
No Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Multiple Sessions of Object-Location-Memory Training in Healthy Older Adults
title No Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Multiple Sessions of Object-Location-Memory Training in Healthy Older Adults
title_full No Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Multiple Sessions of Object-Location-Memory Training in Healthy Older Adults
title_fullStr No Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Multiple Sessions of Object-Location-Memory Training in Healthy Older Adults
title_full_unstemmed No Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Multiple Sessions of Object-Location-Memory Training in Healthy Older Adults
title_short No Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Multiple Sessions of Object-Location-Memory Training in Healthy Older Adults
title_sort no effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on multiple sessions of object-location-memory training in healthy older adults
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375290
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00746
work_keys_str_mv AT kulzownadine noeffectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonmultiplesessionsofobjectlocationmemorytraininginhealthyolderadults
AT cavalcantidesousaangelicavieira noeffectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonmultiplesessionsofobjectlocationmemorytraininginhealthyolderadults
AT cesarzmagda noeffectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonmultiplesessionsofobjectlocationmemorytraininginhealthyolderadults
AT hankejuliemarie noeffectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonmultiplesessionsofobjectlocationmemorytraininginhealthyolderadults
AT gunsbergalida noeffectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonmultiplesessionsofobjectlocationmemorytraininginhealthyolderadults
AT hardersolvejg noeffectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonmultiplesessionsofobjectlocationmemorytraininginhealthyolderadults
AT koblitzswantje noeffectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonmultiplesessionsofobjectlocationmemorytraininginhealthyolderadults
AT grittnerulrike noeffectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonmultiplesessionsofobjectlocationmemorytraininginhealthyolderadults
AT floelagnes noeffectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationonmultiplesessionsofobjectlocationmemorytraininginhealthyolderadults