Cargando…

Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome?

BACKGROUND: Implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a highly accurate aneuploidy screening test has raised questions around whether the high uptake may result in more terminations of pregnancies and fewer births of children with Down syndrome (DS). AIM: The aim of the study was to i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hill, Melissa, Barrett, Angela, Choolani, Mahesh, Lewis, Celine, Fisher, Jane, Chitty, Lyn S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29111614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5182
_version_ 1783292588892094464
author Hill, Melissa
Barrett, Angela
Choolani, Mahesh
Lewis, Celine
Fisher, Jane
Chitty, Lyn S.
author_facet Hill, Melissa
Barrett, Angela
Choolani, Mahesh
Lewis, Celine
Fisher, Jane
Chitty, Lyn S.
author_sort Hill, Melissa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a highly accurate aneuploidy screening test has raised questions around whether the high uptake may result in more terminations of pregnancies and fewer births of children with Down syndrome (DS). AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of NIPT on termination and live birth rates for DS. METHODS: Literature reporting pregnancy outcomes following NIPT was reviewed. Termination rates were calculated for women with a high‐risk NIPT result for DS. Two audits of pregnancy outcomes where NIPT indicated DS were conducted in the United Kingdom and Singapore. RESULTS: Fourteen studies from the United States, Asia, Europe, and the United Kingdom were included in the review. Live births of children with DS were reported in 8 studies. Termination rates following NIPT were unchanged or decreased when compared to termination rates prior to the introduction of NIPT. Audits found 15 of 43 women in the United Kingdom and 2 of 6 in Singapore continued pregnancies following a high‐risk NIPT result. CONCLUSIONS: Termination rates following the detection of DS by NIPT are unchanged or decreased compared to historical termination rates. Impact on live birth rates may be minimal in settings where termination rates fall. Population‐based studies are required to determine the true impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5767768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57677682018-02-01 Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome? Hill, Melissa Barrett, Angela Choolani, Mahesh Lewis, Celine Fisher, Jane Chitty, Lyn S. Prenat Diagn Original Articles BACKGROUND: Implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a highly accurate aneuploidy screening test has raised questions around whether the high uptake may result in more terminations of pregnancies and fewer births of children with Down syndrome (DS). AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of NIPT on termination and live birth rates for DS. METHODS: Literature reporting pregnancy outcomes following NIPT was reviewed. Termination rates were calculated for women with a high‐risk NIPT result for DS. Two audits of pregnancy outcomes where NIPT indicated DS were conducted in the United Kingdom and Singapore. RESULTS: Fourteen studies from the United States, Asia, Europe, and the United Kingdom were included in the review. Live births of children with DS were reported in 8 studies. Termination rates following NIPT were unchanged or decreased when compared to termination rates prior to the introduction of NIPT. Audits found 15 of 43 women in the United Kingdom and 2 of 6 in Singapore continued pregnancies following a high‐risk NIPT result. CONCLUSIONS: Termination rates following the detection of DS by NIPT are unchanged or decreased compared to historical termination rates. Impact on live birth rates may be minimal in settings where termination rates fall. Population‐based studies are required to determine the true impact. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-29 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5767768/ /pubmed/29111614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5182 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hill, Melissa
Barrett, Angela
Choolani, Mahesh
Lewis, Celine
Fisher, Jane
Chitty, Lyn S.
Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome?
title Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome?
title_full Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome?
title_fullStr Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome?
title_full_unstemmed Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome?
title_short Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome?
title_sort has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with down syndrome?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29111614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5182
work_keys_str_mv AT hillmelissa hasnoninvasiveprenataltestingimpactedterminationofpregnancyandlivebirthratesofinfantswithdownsyndrome
AT barrettangela hasnoninvasiveprenataltestingimpactedterminationofpregnancyandlivebirthratesofinfantswithdownsyndrome
AT choolanimahesh hasnoninvasiveprenataltestingimpactedterminationofpregnancyandlivebirthratesofinfantswithdownsyndrome
AT lewisceline hasnoninvasiveprenataltestingimpactedterminationofpregnancyandlivebirthratesofinfantswithdownsyndrome
AT fisherjane hasnoninvasiveprenataltestingimpactedterminationofpregnancyandlivebirthratesofinfantswithdownsyndrome
AT chittylyns hasnoninvasiveprenataltestingimpactedterminationofpregnancyandlivebirthratesofinfantswithdownsyndrome