Cargando…
Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome?
BACKGROUND: Implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a highly accurate aneuploidy screening test has raised questions around whether the high uptake may result in more terminations of pregnancies and fewer births of children with Down syndrome (DS). AIM: The aim of the study was to i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29111614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5182 |
_version_ | 1783292588892094464 |
---|---|
author | Hill, Melissa Barrett, Angela Choolani, Mahesh Lewis, Celine Fisher, Jane Chitty, Lyn S. |
author_facet | Hill, Melissa Barrett, Angela Choolani, Mahesh Lewis, Celine Fisher, Jane Chitty, Lyn S. |
author_sort | Hill, Melissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a highly accurate aneuploidy screening test has raised questions around whether the high uptake may result in more terminations of pregnancies and fewer births of children with Down syndrome (DS). AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of NIPT on termination and live birth rates for DS. METHODS: Literature reporting pregnancy outcomes following NIPT was reviewed. Termination rates were calculated for women with a high‐risk NIPT result for DS. Two audits of pregnancy outcomes where NIPT indicated DS were conducted in the United Kingdom and Singapore. RESULTS: Fourteen studies from the United States, Asia, Europe, and the United Kingdom were included in the review. Live births of children with DS were reported in 8 studies. Termination rates following NIPT were unchanged or decreased when compared to termination rates prior to the introduction of NIPT. Audits found 15 of 43 women in the United Kingdom and 2 of 6 in Singapore continued pregnancies following a high‐risk NIPT result. CONCLUSIONS: Termination rates following the detection of DS by NIPT are unchanged or decreased compared to historical termination rates. Impact on live birth rates may be minimal in settings where termination rates fall. Population‐based studies are required to determine the true impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5767768 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57677682018-02-01 Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome? Hill, Melissa Barrett, Angela Choolani, Mahesh Lewis, Celine Fisher, Jane Chitty, Lyn S. Prenat Diagn Original Articles BACKGROUND: Implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a highly accurate aneuploidy screening test has raised questions around whether the high uptake may result in more terminations of pregnancies and fewer births of children with Down syndrome (DS). AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of NIPT on termination and live birth rates for DS. METHODS: Literature reporting pregnancy outcomes following NIPT was reviewed. Termination rates were calculated for women with a high‐risk NIPT result for DS. Two audits of pregnancy outcomes where NIPT indicated DS were conducted in the United Kingdom and Singapore. RESULTS: Fourteen studies from the United States, Asia, Europe, and the United Kingdom were included in the review. Live births of children with DS were reported in 8 studies. Termination rates following NIPT were unchanged or decreased when compared to termination rates prior to the introduction of NIPT. Audits found 15 of 43 women in the United Kingdom and 2 of 6 in Singapore continued pregnancies following a high‐risk NIPT result. CONCLUSIONS: Termination rates following the detection of DS by NIPT are unchanged or decreased compared to historical termination rates. Impact on live birth rates may be minimal in settings where termination rates fall. Population‐based studies are required to determine the true impact. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-29 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5767768/ /pubmed/29111614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5182 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hill, Melissa Barrett, Angela Choolani, Mahesh Lewis, Celine Fisher, Jane Chitty, Lyn S. Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome? |
title | Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome? |
title_full | Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome? |
title_fullStr | Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome? |
title_full_unstemmed | Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome? |
title_short | Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome? |
title_sort | has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with down syndrome? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29111614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5182 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hillmelissa hasnoninvasiveprenataltestingimpactedterminationofpregnancyandlivebirthratesofinfantswithdownsyndrome AT barrettangela hasnoninvasiveprenataltestingimpactedterminationofpregnancyandlivebirthratesofinfantswithdownsyndrome AT choolanimahesh hasnoninvasiveprenataltestingimpactedterminationofpregnancyandlivebirthratesofinfantswithdownsyndrome AT lewisceline hasnoninvasiveprenataltestingimpactedterminationofpregnancyandlivebirthratesofinfantswithdownsyndrome AT fisherjane hasnoninvasiveprenataltestingimpactedterminationofpregnancyandlivebirthratesofinfantswithdownsyndrome AT chittylyns hasnoninvasiveprenataltestingimpactedterminationofpregnancyandlivebirthratesofinfantswithdownsyndrome |