Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An in vitro study

CONTEXT: Endodontic retreatment is performed in teeth with endodontic failures. The main goal of retreatment is cleaning and shaping of the root canal with removal of old root filling material. Hand instruments and rotary instruments are mainly used for removing this filling material. AIM OF STUDY:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Siddhartha, De Ida, Ataide, Das, Subhasis, Nair, Vineet, Saha, Nairita, Chattopadhyay, Sayan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29386777
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_132_17
_version_ 1783292602276118528
author Das, Siddhartha
De Ida, Ataide
Das, Subhasis
Nair, Vineet
Saha, Nairita
Chattopadhyay, Sayan
author_facet Das, Siddhartha
De Ida, Ataide
Das, Subhasis
Nair, Vineet
Saha, Nairita
Chattopadhyay, Sayan
author_sort Das, Siddhartha
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Endodontic retreatment is performed in teeth with endodontic failures. The main goal of retreatment is cleaning and shaping of the root canal with removal of old root filling material. Hand instruments and rotary instruments are mainly used for removing this filling material. AIM OF STUDY: To compare the relative efficacy of three rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment. OBJECTIVE OF STUDY: To find out which NiTi system is more efficacious in retreatment and to check out the efficacy of retreatment with and without use of solvent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty freshly extracted, single-rooted human mandibular premolars were instrumented with K-files, and each root canal was filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus (Dentsply Detrey, Konstanz, Germany) sealer using lateral compaction. Specimens were then divided into three experimental groups with twenty specimens each. Groups were then subdivided into ten specimens each. Groups were then retreated either with or without solvent. The removal of gutta-percha was performed using ProTaper retreatment files, Mtwo retreatment files, and R-Endo files after 2 weeks. The amount of root canal filling material remnant in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds was measured using stereomicroscope and computer image analysis program. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were evaluated statistically using analysis of variance. RESULTS: ProTaper group was found to have less remnant filling material as compared to the other groups in coronal and middle thirds, but a significant difference was observed between ProTaper and Mtwo and Mtwo and R-Endo in the nonsolvent groups (P < 0.05). Mtwo group demonstrated less amount of remaining filling material in the nonsolvent group. CONCLUSIONS: Both nickel–titanium systems and ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment file systems, were found to be effective in the removal of root canal filling material. However, complete removal of gutta-percha from root canals did not occur with any of the experimental groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5767824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57678242018-01-31 Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An in vitro study Das, Siddhartha De Ida, Ataide Das, Subhasis Nair, Vineet Saha, Nairita Chattopadhyay, Sayan J Conserv Dent Original Article CONTEXT: Endodontic retreatment is performed in teeth with endodontic failures. The main goal of retreatment is cleaning and shaping of the root canal with removal of old root filling material. Hand instruments and rotary instruments are mainly used for removing this filling material. AIM OF STUDY: To compare the relative efficacy of three rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment. OBJECTIVE OF STUDY: To find out which NiTi system is more efficacious in retreatment and to check out the efficacy of retreatment with and without use of solvent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty freshly extracted, single-rooted human mandibular premolars were instrumented with K-files, and each root canal was filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus (Dentsply Detrey, Konstanz, Germany) sealer using lateral compaction. Specimens were then divided into three experimental groups with twenty specimens each. Groups were then subdivided into ten specimens each. Groups were then retreated either with or without solvent. The removal of gutta-percha was performed using ProTaper retreatment files, Mtwo retreatment files, and R-Endo files after 2 weeks. The amount of root canal filling material remnant in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds was measured using stereomicroscope and computer image analysis program. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were evaluated statistically using analysis of variance. RESULTS: ProTaper group was found to have less remnant filling material as compared to the other groups in coronal and middle thirds, but a significant difference was observed between ProTaper and Mtwo and Mtwo and R-Endo in the nonsolvent groups (P < 0.05). Mtwo group demonstrated less amount of remaining filling material in the nonsolvent group. CONCLUSIONS: Both nickel–titanium systems and ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment file systems, were found to be effective in the removal of root canal filling material. However, complete removal of gutta-percha from root canals did not occur with any of the experimental groups. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5767824/ /pubmed/29386777 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_132_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Das, Siddhartha
De Ida, Ataide
Das, Subhasis
Nair, Vineet
Saha, Nairita
Chattopadhyay, Sayan
Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29386777
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_132_17
work_keys_str_mv AT dassiddhartha comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentrotaryinstrumentationsystemsforremovalofguttaperchafromrootcanalduringendodonticretreatmentaninvitrostudy
AT deidaataide comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentrotaryinstrumentationsystemsforremovalofguttaperchafromrootcanalduringendodonticretreatmentaninvitrostudy
AT dassubhasis comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentrotaryinstrumentationsystemsforremovalofguttaperchafromrootcanalduringendodonticretreatmentaninvitrostudy
AT nairvineet comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentrotaryinstrumentationsystemsforremovalofguttaperchafromrootcanalduringendodonticretreatmentaninvitrostudy
AT sahanairita comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentrotaryinstrumentationsystemsforremovalofguttaperchafromrootcanalduringendodonticretreatmentaninvitrostudy
AT chattopadhyaysayan comparativeevaluationofthreedifferentrotaryinstrumentationsystemsforremovalofguttaperchafromrootcanalduringendodonticretreatmentaninvitrostudy