Cargando…
Apical extrusion of debris during root canal preparation using a novel nickel-titanium file system: WaveOne gold
AIM: This study was intended to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris following root canal preparation with three different instrumentation systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty mandibular incisor teeth were selected and randomly divided into three groups (n = 20/group) according to the in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29386779 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_407_16 |
Sumario: | AIM: This study was intended to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris following root canal preparation with three different instrumentation systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty mandibular incisor teeth were selected and randomly divided into three groups (n = 20/group) according to the instrumentation system used: the ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), the Twisted File Adaptive (TFA; SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA), and the WaveOne Gold (WOG; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). All apically extruded debris was collected and dried in preweighed glass vials. The mean weight of the apically extruded debris was obtained using a microbalance. The time for root canal preparation was also recorded. The data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean weights of apically extruded debris were 0.00035 ± 0.00014 g (PTN); 0.00023 ± 0.0001 g (TFA); and 0.00019 ± 0.0001 g (WOG) (P < 0.01). The mean preparation time value was 301,13 ± 62.14 s (PTN); 234.27 ± 34.88 s (TFA); and 239.8 ± 58.6 s (WOG) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The PTN system extruded more debris than the TFA and WOG systems. The TFA and WOG systems were faster than the PTN system. |
---|