Cargando…
Bioactive glass versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin for treating periodontal intrabony defects: A comparative clinical study
BACKGROUND: To compare treatment modalities: Open flap debridement (OFD) alone (Group I), OFD in combination with PerioGlas(®) (Group II), and OFD in combination with autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) (Group III) for periodontal intrabony defects (IBDs). AIM: To evaluate on clinical and radiogra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29386798 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.201628 |
_version_ | 1783292627938967552 |
---|---|
author | Yajamanya, Shravanthi Raghav Chatterjee, Anirban Hussain, Ahad Coutinho, Amita Das, Sushma Subbaiah, Shobha |
author_facet | Yajamanya, Shravanthi Raghav Chatterjee, Anirban Hussain, Ahad Coutinho, Amita Das, Sushma Subbaiah, Shobha |
author_sort | Yajamanya, Shravanthi Raghav |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare treatment modalities: Open flap debridement (OFD) alone (Group I), OFD in combination with PerioGlas(®) (Group II), and OFD in combination with autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) (Group III) for periodontal intrabony defects (IBDs). AIM: To evaluate on clinical and radiographic basis, effectiveness of PerioGlas(®), and PRF in treating IBDs. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: IBDs selected on the basis of the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to Groups I, II, and III by coin toss method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on patients reporting to the department of periodontology and oral implantology. Thirty-eight patients with ninety periodontal IBDs of moderate to severe periodontitis were selected and assigned to Groups I, II, and III. In each patient, a minimum number of two sextants were present with pocket depths ≥5 mm in at least three teeth. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis based on mean values, standard deviation, and P values. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, 9 months postoperatively: (1) mean probing pocket depth reduction for Group I was 3.68 mm ± 0.72, for Group II was 5.57 mm ± 1.10, and for Group III was 6.11 mm ± 0.92. (2) The mean relative attachment level gain for Group I was 4.14 mm ± 0.76, for Group II was 6.57 mm ± 1.45, and for Group III was 6.74 mm ± 1.55. (3) Mean radiographic IBD fill for Group I was 69.29% mm ± 7.73, for Group II was 74.44% mm ± 8.57, and for Group III was 75.01% mm ± 7.85. CONCLUSION: This study shows marked improvements in the clinical parameters and radiographic outcomes with both PerioGlas(®) and autologous PRF to treat periodontal IBDs as compared to OFD alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5767987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57679872018-01-31 Bioactive glass versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin for treating periodontal intrabony defects: A comparative clinical study Yajamanya, Shravanthi Raghav Chatterjee, Anirban Hussain, Ahad Coutinho, Amita Das, Sushma Subbaiah, Shobha J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: To compare treatment modalities: Open flap debridement (OFD) alone (Group I), OFD in combination with PerioGlas(®) (Group II), and OFD in combination with autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) (Group III) for periodontal intrabony defects (IBDs). AIM: To evaluate on clinical and radiographic basis, effectiveness of PerioGlas(®), and PRF in treating IBDs. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: IBDs selected on the basis of the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to Groups I, II, and III by coin toss method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on patients reporting to the department of periodontology and oral implantology. Thirty-eight patients with ninety periodontal IBDs of moderate to severe periodontitis were selected and assigned to Groups I, II, and III. In each patient, a minimum number of two sextants were present with pocket depths ≥5 mm in at least three teeth. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis based on mean values, standard deviation, and P values. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, 9 months postoperatively: (1) mean probing pocket depth reduction for Group I was 3.68 mm ± 0.72, for Group II was 5.57 mm ± 1.10, and for Group III was 6.11 mm ± 0.92. (2) The mean relative attachment level gain for Group I was 4.14 mm ± 0.76, for Group II was 6.57 mm ± 1.45, and for Group III was 6.74 mm ± 1.55. (3) Mean radiographic IBD fill for Group I was 69.29% mm ± 7.73, for Group II was 74.44% mm ± 8.57, and for Group III was 75.01% mm ± 7.85. CONCLUSION: This study shows marked improvements in the clinical parameters and radiographic outcomes with both PerioGlas(®) and autologous PRF to treat periodontal IBDs as compared to OFD alone. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5767987/ /pubmed/29386798 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.201628 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yajamanya, Shravanthi Raghav Chatterjee, Anirban Hussain, Ahad Coutinho, Amita Das, Sushma Subbaiah, Shobha Bioactive glass versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin for treating periodontal intrabony defects: A comparative clinical study |
title | Bioactive glass versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin for treating periodontal intrabony defects: A comparative clinical study |
title_full | Bioactive glass versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin for treating periodontal intrabony defects: A comparative clinical study |
title_fullStr | Bioactive glass versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin for treating periodontal intrabony defects: A comparative clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Bioactive glass versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin for treating periodontal intrabony defects: A comparative clinical study |
title_short | Bioactive glass versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin for treating periodontal intrabony defects: A comparative clinical study |
title_sort | bioactive glass versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin for treating periodontal intrabony defects: a comparative clinical study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5767987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29386798 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.201628 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yajamanyashravanthiraghav bioactiveglassversusautologousplateletrichfibrinfortreatingperiodontalintrabonydefectsacomparativeclinicalstudy AT chatterjeeanirban bioactiveglassversusautologousplateletrichfibrinfortreatingperiodontalintrabonydefectsacomparativeclinicalstudy AT hussainahad bioactiveglassversusautologousplateletrichfibrinfortreatingperiodontalintrabonydefectsacomparativeclinicalstudy AT coutinhoamita bioactiveglassversusautologousplateletrichfibrinfortreatingperiodontalintrabonydefectsacomparativeclinicalstudy AT dassushma bioactiveglassversusautologousplateletrichfibrinfortreatingperiodontalintrabonydefectsacomparativeclinicalstudy AT subbaiahshobha bioactiveglassversusautologousplateletrichfibrinfortreatingperiodontalintrabonydefectsacomparativeclinicalstudy |