Cargando…

On the gEUD biological optimization objective for organs at risk in Photon Optimizer of Eclipse treatment planning system

Inverse planning optimization using biologically based objectives is becoming part of the intensity modulated optimization process. The performances and efficacy of the biologically based gEUD (generalized Equivalent Uniform Dose) objective implemented in the Photon Optimizer (PO) of Varian Eclipse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fogliata, Antonella, Thompson, Stephen, Stravato, Antonella, Tomatis, Stefano, Scorsetti, Marta, Cozzi, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5768006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12224
_version_ 1783292632496078848
author Fogliata, Antonella
Thompson, Stephen
Stravato, Antonella
Tomatis, Stefano
Scorsetti, Marta
Cozzi, Luca
author_facet Fogliata, Antonella
Thompson, Stephen
Stravato, Antonella
Tomatis, Stefano
Scorsetti, Marta
Cozzi, Luca
author_sort Fogliata, Antonella
collection PubMed
description Inverse planning optimization using biologically based objectives is becoming part of the intensity modulated optimization process. The performances and efficacy of the biologically based gEUD (generalized Equivalent Uniform Dose) objective implemented in the Photon Optimizer (PO) of Varian Eclipse treatment planning system have been here analyzed. gEUD is associated with the parameter a that accounts for the seriality of a structure, being higher for more serial organs. The PO was used to optimize volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans on a virtual homogeneous cylindrical phantom presenting a target and an organ at risk (OAR). The OAR was placed at 4 mm, 1 and 2 cm distance, or cropped at 0, 2 and 4 mm from the target. Homogeneous target dose of 60 Gy in 20 fractions was requested with physical dose‐volume objectives, while OAR dose was minimized with the upper gEUD objective. The gEUD specific a parameter was varied from 0.1 to 40 to assess its impact to OAR sparing and target coverage. Actual head and neck and prostate cases, with one parotid and the rectum as test OAR, were also analyzed to translate the results in the more complex clinical environment. Increasing the a parameter value in the gEUD objective, the optimization achieved lower volumes of the OAR which received the highest dose levels. The maximum dose in the OAR was minimized well with a values up to 20, while further increase of a to 40 did not further improve the result. The OAR mean dose was reduced for the OAR located at 1 and 2 cm distance from the target, enforced with increasing a. For cropped OARs, a mean dose reduction was achieved for a values up to 3–5, but mean dose increased for higher a values. The optimal choice of the parameter a depends on the mutual OAR and target position, and seriality of the organ. Today no significant compendium of clinical and biological specific a and gEUD values are available for a wide range of OARs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5768006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57680062018-04-02 On the gEUD biological optimization objective for organs at risk in Photon Optimizer of Eclipse treatment planning system Fogliata, Antonella Thompson, Stephen Stravato, Antonella Tomatis, Stefano Scorsetti, Marta Cozzi, Luca J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Inverse planning optimization using biologically based objectives is becoming part of the intensity modulated optimization process. The performances and efficacy of the biologically based gEUD (generalized Equivalent Uniform Dose) objective implemented in the Photon Optimizer (PO) of Varian Eclipse treatment planning system have been here analyzed. gEUD is associated with the parameter a that accounts for the seriality of a structure, being higher for more serial organs. The PO was used to optimize volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans on a virtual homogeneous cylindrical phantom presenting a target and an organ at risk (OAR). The OAR was placed at 4 mm, 1 and 2 cm distance, or cropped at 0, 2 and 4 mm from the target. Homogeneous target dose of 60 Gy in 20 fractions was requested with physical dose‐volume objectives, while OAR dose was minimized with the upper gEUD objective. The gEUD specific a parameter was varied from 0.1 to 40 to assess its impact to OAR sparing and target coverage. Actual head and neck and prostate cases, with one parotid and the rectum as test OAR, were also analyzed to translate the results in the more complex clinical environment. Increasing the a parameter value in the gEUD objective, the optimization achieved lower volumes of the OAR which received the highest dose levels. The maximum dose in the OAR was minimized well with a values up to 20, while further increase of a to 40 did not further improve the result. The OAR mean dose was reduced for the OAR located at 1 and 2 cm distance from the target, enforced with increasing a. For cropped OARs, a mean dose reduction was achieved for a values up to 3–5, but mean dose increased for higher a values. The optimal choice of the parameter a depends on the mutual OAR and target position, and seriality of the organ. Today no significant compendium of clinical and biological specific a and gEUD values are available for a wide range of OARs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5768006/ /pubmed/29152846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12224 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Fogliata, Antonella
Thompson, Stephen
Stravato, Antonella
Tomatis, Stefano
Scorsetti, Marta
Cozzi, Luca
On the gEUD biological optimization objective for organs at risk in Photon Optimizer of Eclipse treatment planning system
title On the gEUD biological optimization objective for organs at risk in Photon Optimizer of Eclipse treatment planning system
title_full On the gEUD biological optimization objective for organs at risk in Photon Optimizer of Eclipse treatment planning system
title_fullStr On the gEUD biological optimization objective for organs at risk in Photon Optimizer of Eclipse treatment planning system
title_full_unstemmed On the gEUD biological optimization objective for organs at risk in Photon Optimizer of Eclipse treatment planning system
title_short On the gEUD biological optimization objective for organs at risk in Photon Optimizer of Eclipse treatment planning system
title_sort on the geud biological optimization objective for organs at risk in photon optimizer of eclipse treatment planning system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5768006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12224
work_keys_str_mv AT fogliataantonella onthegeudbiologicaloptimizationobjectivefororgansatriskinphotonoptimizerofeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem
AT thompsonstephen onthegeudbiologicaloptimizationobjectivefororgansatriskinphotonoptimizerofeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem
AT stravatoantonella onthegeudbiologicaloptimizationobjectivefororgansatriskinphotonoptimizerofeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem
AT tomatisstefano onthegeudbiologicaloptimizationobjectivefororgansatriskinphotonoptimizerofeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem
AT scorsettimarta onthegeudbiologicaloptimizationobjectivefororgansatriskinphotonoptimizerofeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem
AT cozziluca onthegeudbiologicaloptimizationobjectivefororgansatriskinphotonoptimizerofeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem