Cargando…

Hippocampal sparing approach in fractionated stereotactic brain VMAT radio therapy: A retrospective feasibility analysis

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) techniques for fractioned stereotactic brain radiotherapy (FSBRT) can achieve highly conformal dose distribution to intracranial lesions. However, they can potentially increase the dose to hippocampus (H) causing neurocognitive toxicity during the first four m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniela Falco, Maria, Giancaterino, Stefano, D'Andrea, Marco, Gimenez De Lorenzo, Ramon, Trignani, Marianna, Caravatta, Luciana, Di Carlo, Clelia, Di Biase, Saide, Allajbej, Albina, Genovesi, Domenico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5768008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29125239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12216
_version_ 1783292632972132352
author Daniela Falco, Maria
Giancaterino, Stefano
D'Andrea, Marco
Gimenez De Lorenzo, Ramon
Trignani, Marianna
Caravatta, Luciana
Di Carlo, Clelia
Di Biase, Saide
Allajbej, Albina
Genovesi, Domenico
author_facet Daniela Falco, Maria
Giancaterino, Stefano
D'Andrea, Marco
Gimenez De Lorenzo, Ramon
Trignani, Marianna
Caravatta, Luciana
Di Carlo, Clelia
Di Biase, Saide
Allajbej, Albina
Genovesi, Domenico
author_sort Daniela Falco, Maria
collection PubMed
description Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) techniques for fractioned stereotactic brain radiotherapy (FSBRT) can achieve highly conformal dose distribution to intracranial lesions. However, they can potentially increase the dose to hippocampus (H) causing neurocognitive toxicity during the first four months after irradiation. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of hippocampal‐sparing (HS) treatment plans in 22 patients with brain metastasis treated with VMAT technique. Firstly, we retrospectively analyzed hippocampal doses in all 22 VMAT original (not hippocampal‐sparing, NHS) plans. Plans with hippocampal dose exceeding constraints (9 out of 22) were re‐planned considering dose constraints on the hippocampus (H) and on hippocampal avoidance zone (HAZ) generated using 5 mm isotropic margin to the hippocampus. Conformity (CI) and homogeneity indexes (HI) on the target and MUs, were maintained as close as possible to the original plans. Mean CI(NHS) and CI(HS) obtained were: 0.79 ± 0.11 and 0.81 ± 0.10, respectively (P = 0.75); mean HI(NHS) and HI(HS) were 1.05 ± 0.02 and 1.04 ± 0.01 respectively (P = 0.72). In both sets of plans, the mean MU values were similar: 1033 ± 275 and 1022 ± 234 for NHS and HS respectively. In HS plans, the mean hippocampal dose was decreased by an average of 35%. After replanning, the D(max) (21.3 Gy) for HAZ and H was met by 45% (4/9) and 78% (7/9) of the NHS plans, respectively. The worst results were obtained for cases with target volumes extention closer than 12 mm to H, because of the difficulty to spare hippocampus without compromising target coverage. After replanning D(40%) constraint value (7.3 Gy) was met by all the 9 NHS plans. In conclusion, this study suggests that an hippocampal‐sparing approach to FSBRT is feasible resulting in a decrease in the dose to the hippocampus without any loss in conformity or increase in treatment time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5768008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57680082018-04-02 Hippocampal sparing approach in fractionated stereotactic brain VMAT radio therapy: A retrospective feasibility analysis Daniela Falco, Maria Giancaterino, Stefano D'Andrea, Marco Gimenez De Lorenzo, Ramon Trignani, Marianna Caravatta, Luciana Di Carlo, Clelia Di Biase, Saide Allajbej, Albina Genovesi, Domenico J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) techniques for fractioned stereotactic brain radiotherapy (FSBRT) can achieve highly conformal dose distribution to intracranial lesions. However, they can potentially increase the dose to hippocampus (H) causing neurocognitive toxicity during the first four months after irradiation. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of hippocampal‐sparing (HS) treatment plans in 22 patients with brain metastasis treated with VMAT technique. Firstly, we retrospectively analyzed hippocampal doses in all 22 VMAT original (not hippocampal‐sparing, NHS) plans. Plans with hippocampal dose exceeding constraints (9 out of 22) were re‐planned considering dose constraints on the hippocampus (H) and on hippocampal avoidance zone (HAZ) generated using 5 mm isotropic margin to the hippocampus. Conformity (CI) and homogeneity indexes (HI) on the target and MUs, were maintained as close as possible to the original plans. Mean CI(NHS) and CI(HS) obtained were: 0.79 ± 0.11 and 0.81 ± 0.10, respectively (P = 0.75); mean HI(NHS) and HI(HS) were 1.05 ± 0.02 and 1.04 ± 0.01 respectively (P = 0.72). In both sets of plans, the mean MU values were similar: 1033 ± 275 and 1022 ± 234 for NHS and HS respectively. In HS plans, the mean hippocampal dose was decreased by an average of 35%. After replanning, the D(max) (21.3 Gy) for HAZ and H was met by 45% (4/9) and 78% (7/9) of the NHS plans, respectively. The worst results were obtained for cases with target volumes extention closer than 12 mm to H, because of the difficulty to spare hippocampus without compromising target coverage. After replanning D(40%) constraint value (7.3 Gy) was met by all the 9 NHS plans. In conclusion, this study suggests that an hippocampal‐sparing approach to FSBRT is feasible resulting in a decrease in the dose to the hippocampus without any loss in conformity or increase in treatment time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5768008/ /pubmed/29125239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12216 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Daniela Falco, Maria
Giancaterino, Stefano
D'Andrea, Marco
Gimenez De Lorenzo, Ramon
Trignani, Marianna
Caravatta, Luciana
Di Carlo, Clelia
Di Biase, Saide
Allajbej, Albina
Genovesi, Domenico
Hippocampal sparing approach in fractionated stereotactic brain VMAT radio therapy: A retrospective feasibility analysis
title Hippocampal sparing approach in fractionated stereotactic brain VMAT radio therapy: A retrospective feasibility analysis
title_full Hippocampal sparing approach in fractionated stereotactic brain VMAT radio therapy: A retrospective feasibility analysis
title_fullStr Hippocampal sparing approach in fractionated stereotactic brain VMAT radio therapy: A retrospective feasibility analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hippocampal sparing approach in fractionated stereotactic brain VMAT radio therapy: A retrospective feasibility analysis
title_short Hippocampal sparing approach in fractionated stereotactic brain VMAT radio therapy: A retrospective feasibility analysis
title_sort hippocampal sparing approach in fractionated stereotactic brain vmat radio therapy: a retrospective feasibility analysis
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5768008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29125239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12216
work_keys_str_mv AT danielafalcomaria hippocampalsparingapproachinfractionatedstereotacticbrainvmatradiotherapyaretrospectivefeasibilityanalysis
AT giancaterinostefano hippocampalsparingapproachinfractionatedstereotacticbrainvmatradiotherapyaretrospectivefeasibilityanalysis
AT dandreamarco hippocampalsparingapproachinfractionatedstereotacticbrainvmatradiotherapyaretrospectivefeasibilityanalysis
AT gimenezdelorenzoramon hippocampalsparingapproachinfractionatedstereotacticbrainvmatradiotherapyaretrospectivefeasibilityanalysis
AT trignanimarianna hippocampalsparingapproachinfractionatedstereotacticbrainvmatradiotherapyaretrospectivefeasibilityanalysis
AT caravattaluciana hippocampalsparingapproachinfractionatedstereotacticbrainvmatradiotherapyaretrospectivefeasibilityanalysis
AT dicarloclelia hippocampalsparingapproachinfractionatedstereotacticbrainvmatradiotherapyaretrospectivefeasibilityanalysis
AT dibiasesaide hippocampalsparingapproachinfractionatedstereotacticbrainvmatradiotherapyaretrospectivefeasibilityanalysis
AT allajbejalbina hippocampalsparingapproachinfractionatedstereotacticbrainvmatradiotherapyaretrospectivefeasibilityanalysis
AT genovesidomenico hippocampalsparingapproachinfractionatedstereotacticbrainvmatradiotherapyaretrospectivefeasibilityanalysis